Redefining Sociophonetic Competence: Mapping COG Differences in Phrase-Final Fricative Epithesis in L1 and L2 Speakers of French

This article presents a study of measures of center of gravity (COG) in phrase-final fricative epithesis (PFFE) produced by L1 and L2 speakers of Continental French (CF). Participants completed a reading task targeting 98 tokens of /i,y,u/ in phrase-final position. COG measures were taken at the 25%...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Amanda Dalola, Keiko Bridwell
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-11-01
Series:Languages
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2226-471X/5/4/59
id doaj-f73fac80722d4c1baaf791ae6c9db2c1
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f73fac80722d4c1baaf791ae6c9db2c12020-11-25T04:06:04ZengMDPI AGLanguages2226-471X2020-11-015595910.3390/languages5040059Redefining Sociophonetic Competence: Mapping COG Differences in Phrase-Final Fricative Epithesis in L1 and L2 Speakers of FrenchAmanda Dalola0Keiko Bridwell1Department of Languages, Literatures & Cultures, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208, USADepartment of Linguistics, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30605, USAThis article presents a study of measures of center of gravity (COG) in phrase-final fricative epithesis (PFFE) produced by L1 and L2 speakers of Continental French (CF). Participants completed a reading task targeting 98 tokens of /i,y,u/ in phrase-final position. COG measures were taken at the 25%, 50% and 75% marks, normalized and submitted to a mixed linear regression. Results revealed that L2 speakers showed higher COG values than L1 speakers in low PFFE-to-vowel ratios at the 25%, 50%, and 75% marks. COG measures were then categorized into six profile types on the basis of their frequencies at each timepoint: flat–low, flat–high, rising, falling, rising–falling, and falling–rising. Counts of COG profile were then submitted to multinomial logistic regression. Results revealed that although L1 speakers produced predominantly flat–low profile types at lower percent devoicings, L2 speakers preferred multiple strategies involving higher levels of articulatory energy (rising, falling, rise–fall). These results suggest that while L1 speakers realize PFFE differently with respect to phonological context, L2 speakers rely on its most common allophone, strong frication, in most contexts. As such, the findings of this study argue for an additional phonetic dimension in the construct of L2 sociophonetic competence.https://www.mdpi.com/2226-471X/5/4/59sociophoneticscompetencefricative epithesisvowel devoicingcenter of gravityFrench
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Amanda Dalola
Keiko Bridwell
spellingShingle Amanda Dalola
Keiko Bridwell
Redefining Sociophonetic Competence: Mapping COG Differences in Phrase-Final Fricative Epithesis in L1 and L2 Speakers of French
Languages
sociophonetics
competence
fricative epithesis
vowel devoicing
center of gravity
French
author_facet Amanda Dalola
Keiko Bridwell
author_sort Amanda Dalola
title Redefining Sociophonetic Competence: Mapping COG Differences in Phrase-Final Fricative Epithesis in L1 and L2 Speakers of French
title_short Redefining Sociophonetic Competence: Mapping COG Differences in Phrase-Final Fricative Epithesis in L1 and L2 Speakers of French
title_full Redefining Sociophonetic Competence: Mapping COG Differences in Phrase-Final Fricative Epithesis in L1 and L2 Speakers of French
title_fullStr Redefining Sociophonetic Competence: Mapping COG Differences in Phrase-Final Fricative Epithesis in L1 and L2 Speakers of French
title_full_unstemmed Redefining Sociophonetic Competence: Mapping COG Differences in Phrase-Final Fricative Epithesis in L1 and L2 Speakers of French
title_sort redefining sociophonetic competence: mapping cog differences in phrase-final fricative epithesis in l1 and l2 speakers of french
publisher MDPI AG
series Languages
issn 2226-471X
publishDate 2020-11-01
description This article presents a study of measures of center of gravity (COG) in phrase-final fricative epithesis (PFFE) produced by L1 and L2 speakers of Continental French (CF). Participants completed a reading task targeting 98 tokens of /i,y,u/ in phrase-final position. COG measures were taken at the 25%, 50% and 75% marks, normalized and submitted to a mixed linear regression. Results revealed that L2 speakers showed higher COG values than L1 speakers in low PFFE-to-vowel ratios at the 25%, 50%, and 75% marks. COG measures were then categorized into six profile types on the basis of their frequencies at each timepoint: flat–low, flat–high, rising, falling, rising–falling, and falling–rising. Counts of COG profile were then submitted to multinomial logistic regression. Results revealed that although L1 speakers produced predominantly flat–low profile types at lower percent devoicings, L2 speakers preferred multiple strategies involving higher levels of articulatory energy (rising, falling, rise–fall). These results suggest that while L1 speakers realize PFFE differently with respect to phonological context, L2 speakers rely on its most common allophone, strong frication, in most contexts. As such, the findings of this study argue for an additional phonetic dimension in the construct of L2 sociophonetic competence.
topic sociophonetics
competence
fricative epithesis
vowel devoicing
center of gravity
French
url https://www.mdpi.com/2226-471X/5/4/59
work_keys_str_mv AT amandadalola redefiningsociophoneticcompetencemappingcogdifferencesinphrasefinalfricativeepithesisinl1andl2speakersoffrench
AT keikobridwell redefiningsociophoneticcompetencemappingcogdifferencesinphrasefinalfricativeepithesisinl1andl2speakersoffrench
_version_ 1724432635981201408