Redefining Sociophonetic Competence: Mapping COG Differences in Phrase-Final Fricative Epithesis in L1 and L2 Speakers of French
This article presents a study of measures of center of gravity (COG) in phrase-final fricative epithesis (PFFE) produced by L1 and L2 speakers of Continental French (CF). Participants completed a reading task targeting 98 tokens of /i,y,u/ in phrase-final position. COG measures were taken at the 25%...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2020-11-01
|
Series: | Languages |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2226-471X/5/4/59 |
id |
doaj-f73fac80722d4c1baaf791ae6c9db2c1 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-f73fac80722d4c1baaf791ae6c9db2c12020-11-25T04:06:04ZengMDPI AGLanguages2226-471X2020-11-015595910.3390/languages5040059Redefining Sociophonetic Competence: Mapping COG Differences in Phrase-Final Fricative Epithesis in L1 and L2 Speakers of FrenchAmanda Dalola0Keiko Bridwell1Department of Languages, Literatures & Cultures, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208, USADepartment of Linguistics, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30605, USAThis article presents a study of measures of center of gravity (COG) in phrase-final fricative epithesis (PFFE) produced by L1 and L2 speakers of Continental French (CF). Participants completed a reading task targeting 98 tokens of /i,y,u/ in phrase-final position. COG measures were taken at the 25%, 50% and 75% marks, normalized and submitted to a mixed linear regression. Results revealed that L2 speakers showed higher COG values than L1 speakers in low PFFE-to-vowel ratios at the 25%, 50%, and 75% marks. COG measures were then categorized into six profile types on the basis of their frequencies at each timepoint: flat–low, flat–high, rising, falling, rising–falling, and falling–rising. Counts of COG profile were then submitted to multinomial logistic regression. Results revealed that although L1 speakers produced predominantly flat–low profile types at lower percent devoicings, L2 speakers preferred multiple strategies involving higher levels of articulatory energy (rising, falling, rise–fall). These results suggest that while L1 speakers realize PFFE differently with respect to phonological context, L2 speakers rely on its most common allophone, strong frication, in most contexts. As such, the findings of this study argue for an additional phonetic dimension in the construct of L2 sociophonetic competence.https://www.mdpi.com/2226-471X/5/4/59sociophoneticscompetencefricative epithesisvowel devoicingcenter of gravityFrench |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Amanda Dalola Keiko Bridwell |
spellingShingle |
Amanda Dalola Keiko Bridwell Redefining Sociophonetic Competence: Mapping COG Differences in Phrase-Final Fricative Epithesis in L1 and L2 Speakers of French Languages sociophonetics competence fricative epithesis vowel devoicing center of gravity French |
author_facet |
Amanda Dalola Keiko Bridwell |
author_sort |
Amanda Dalola |
title |
Redefining Sociophonetic Competence: Mapping COG Differences in Phrase-Final Fricative Epithesis in L1 and L2 Speakers of French |
title_short |
Redefining Sociophonetic Competence: Mapping COG Differences in Phrase-Final Fricative Epithesis in L1 and L2 Speakers of French |
title_full |
Redefining Sociophonetic Competence: Mapping COG Differences in Phrase-Final Fricative Epithesis in L1 and L2 Speakers of French |
title_fullStr |
Redefining Sociophonetic Competence: Mapping COG Differences in Phrase-Final Fricative Epithesis in L1 and L2 Speakers of French |
title_full_unstemmed |
Redefining Sociophonetic Competence: Mapping COG Differences in Phrase-Final Fricative Epithesis in L1 and L2 Speakers of French |
title_sort |
redefining sociophonetic competence: mapping cog differences in phrase-final fricative epithesis in l1 and l2 speakers of french |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Languages |
issn |
2226-471X |
publishDate |
2020-11-01 |
description |
This article presents a study of measures of center of gravity (COG) in phrase-final fricative epithesis (PFFE) produced by L1 and L2 speakers of Continental French (CF). Participants completed a reading task targeting 98 tokens of /i,y,u/ in phrase-final position. COG measures were taken at the 25%, 50% and 75% marks, normalized and submitted to a mixed linear regression. Results revealed that L2 speakers showed higher COG values than L1 speakers in low PFFE-to-vowel ratios at the 25%, 50%, and 75% marks. COG measures were then categorized into six profile types on the basis of their frequencies at each timepoint: flat–low, flat–high, rising, falling, rising–falling, and falling–rising. Counts of COG profile were then submitted to multinomial logistic regression. Results revealed that although L1 speakers produced predominantly flat–low profile types at lower percent devoicings, L2 speakers preferred multiple strategies involving higher levels of articulatory energy (rising, falling, rise–fall). These results suggest that while L1 speakers realize PFFE differently with respect to phonological context, L2 speakers rely on its most common allophone, strong frication, in most contexts. As such, the findings of this study argue for an additional phonetic dimension in the construct of L2 sociophonetic competence. |
topic |
sociophonetics competence fricative epithesis vowel devoicing center of gravity French |
url |
https://www.mdpi.com/2226-471X/5/4/59 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT amandadalola redefiningsociophoneticcompetencemappingcogdifferencesinphrasefinalfricativeepithesisinl1andl2speakersoffrench AT keikobridwell redefiningsociophoneticcompetencemappingcogdifferencesinphrasefinalfricativeepithesisinl1andl2speakersoffrench |
_version_ |
1724432635981201408 |