Cooperation and Critique in Neuroscience: Loops of Feedback Between Philosophy, the Psy Sciences and Neurophenomenology

In the long history of tenuous relations between psychology, psychiatry and philosophy the rise of neuroscience is typically regarded as decisive turn towards biological reductionism. Roughly since the turn of the millennium, however, the story has become more complicated. The emergence of social an...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Cornelius Borck
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: Open Library of Humanities 2019-12-01
Series:Le foucaldien
Subjects:
Online Access:https://foucaldien.net/articles/57
id doaj-f72f7cc272274d929536c014e0b0a354
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f72f7cc272274d929536c014e0b0a3542020-11-25T00:46:15ZdeuOpen Library of HumanitiesLe foucaldien2515-20762019-12-015110.16995/lefou.5750Cooperation and Critique in Neuroscience: Loops of Feedback Between Philosophy, the Psy Sciences and NeurophenomenologyCornelius Borck0Universität zu LübeckIn the long history of tenuous relations between psychology, psychiatry and philosophy the rise of neuroscience is typically regarded as decisive turn towards biological reductionism. Roughly since the turn of the millennium, however, the story has become more complicated. The emergence of social and cultural neuroscience seemed to indicate a new trend toward interdisciplinary cooperation across the nature-culture divide. Situating the emergence of this transdisciplinary agenda in the longer history of biologicalization in psychiatry and neuroscience, however, allows differentiating a mere rhetoric of bridging between neuroscience and humanities from conceptually more stringent studies such as in neurophenomenology. While some actors developed sophisticated experimental settings here for mediating between opposing approaches, others contributed by performative interventions, as critique comes in different forms and formats. In effect, these different lines of work keep the question regarding human nature open; certainly not the least achievement.https://foucaldien.net/articles/57critical neurosciencehistoriographysocio-political contextualizationfrancisco varelahuman naturedissensus
collection DOAJ
language deu
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Cornelius Borck
spellingShingle Cornelius Borck
Cooperation and Critique in Neuroscience: Loops of Feedback Between Philosophy, the Psy Sciences and Neurophenomenology
Le foucaldien
critical neuroscience
historiography
socio-political contextualization
francisco varela
human nature
dissensus
author_facet Cornelius Borck
author_sort Cornelius Borck
title Cooperation and Critique in Neuroscience: Loops of Feedback Between Philosophy, the Psy Sciences and Neurophenomenology
title_short Cooperation and Critique in Neuroscience: Loops of Feedback Between Philosophy, the Psy Sciences and Neurophenomenology
title_full Cooperation and Critique in Neuroscience: Loops of Feedback Between Philosophy, the Psy Sciences and Neurophenomenology
title_fullStr Cooperation and Critique in Neuroscience: Loops of Feedback Between Philosophy, the Psy Sciences and Neurophenomenology
title_full_unstemmed Cooperation and Critique in Neuroscience: Loops of Feedback Between Philosophy, the Psy Sciences and Neurophenomenology
title_sort cooperation and critique in neuroscience: loops of feedback between philosophy, the psy sciences and neurophenomenology
publisher Open Library of Humanities
series Le foucaldien
issn 2515-2076
publishDate 2019-12-01
description In the long history of tenuous relations between psychology, psychiatry and philosophy the rise of neuroscience is typically regarded as decisive turn towards biological reductionism. Roughly since the turn of the millennium, however, the story has become more complicated. The emergence of social and cultural neuroscience seemed to indicate a new trend toward interdisciplinary cooperation across the nature-culture divide. Situating the emergence of this transdisciplinary agenda in the longer history of biologicalization in psychiatry and neuroscience, however, allows differentiating a mere rhetoric of bridging between neuroscience and humanities from conceptually more stringent studies such as in neurophenomenology. While some actors developed sophisticated experimental settings here for mediating between opposing approaches, others contributed by performative interventions, as critique comes in different forms and formats. In effect, these different lines of work keep the question regarding human nature open; certainly not the least achievement.
topic critical neuroscience
historiography
socio-political contextualization
francisco varela
human nature
dissensus
url https://foucaldien.net/articles/57
work_keys_str_mv AT corneliusborck cooperationandcritiqueinneuroscienceloopsoffeedbackbetweenphilosophythepsysciencesandneurophenomenology
_version_ 1725265868000067584