Agentive reflexive clitics and transitive 'se' constructions in Spanish

This paper investigates the structure of transitive sentences that contain a non-doubling reflexive clitic such as Juan se lavó todos los platos and María se leyó un libro. Though these are traditionally labelled unselected (non-core) agreeing datives or aspectual datives, I argue that this label ob...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Grant Armstrong
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Septentrio Academic Publishing 2013-11-01
Series:Borealis: An International Journal of Hispanic Linguistics
Subjects:
se
Online Access:http://www.ub.uit.no/baser/septentrio/index.php/borealis/article/view/2526
id doaj-f72cf0de09294e4f93fbc01a1ef3aa29
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f72cf0de09294e4f93fbc01a1ef3aa292020-11-25T00:49:56ZengSeptentrio Academic PublishingBorealis: An International Journal of Hispanic Linguistics1893-32112013-11-01228112810.7557/1.2.2.25262549Agentive reflexive clitics and transitive 'se' constructions in SpanishGrant ArmstrongThis paper investigates the structure of transitive sentences that contain a non-doubling reflexive clitic such as Juan se lavó todos los platos and María se leyó un libro. Though these are traditionally labelled unselected (non-core) agreeing datives or aspectual datives, I argue that this label obscures a relevant difference between two classes of constructions. agentive reflexive clitic (= ARC) constructions are characterized by a uniform set of effects on the external argument (= it must be an agent) and the aspectual interpretation of the VP (= it must be an accomplishment). On the other hand, transitive se clitic (= TSC) constructions do not impose any type of uniform restrictions on the kind of external argument they take or on the aspectual interpretation of the VP. I propose that the difference between these two constructions may be captured by treating se in the ARC construction as the realization of a special vDO head, based on an idea in Folli & Harley (2005), while se in the TSC construction is generated in the complement position of the verb and incorporates into V, forming a complex predicate, following work by De Cuyper (2006), MacDonald (2004, 2008) and MacDonald & Huidobro (2010). It is shown that many of the empirical and theoretical disagreements that plague the literature on the role of non-doubling se in transitive sentences have a simple solution given the new division established herehttp://www.ub.uit.no/baser/septentrio/index.php/borealis/article/view/2526senon-core dativesintrinsic reflexivityevent structurenon-truth-conditional meaning
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Grant Armstrong
spellingShingle Grant Armstrong
Agentive reflexive clitics and transitive 'se' constructions in Spanish
Borealis: An International Journal of Hispanic Linguistics
se
non-core datives
intrinsic reflexivity
event structure
non-truth-conditional meaning
author_facet Grant Armstrong
author_sort Grant Armstrong
title Agentive reflexive clitics and transitive 'se' constructions in Spanish
title_short Agentive reflexive clitics and transitive 'se' constructions in Spanish
title_full Agentive reflexive clitics and transitive 'se' constructions in Spanish
title_fullStr Agentive reflexive clitics and transitive 'se' constructions in Spanish
title_full_unstemmed Agentive reflexive clitics and transitive 'se' constructions in Spanish
title_sort agentive reflexive clitics and transitive 'se' constructions in spanish
publisher Septentrio Academic Publishing
series Borealis: An International Journal of Hispanic Linguistics
issn 1893-3211
publishDate 2013-11-01
description This paper investigates the structure of transitive sentences that contain a non-doubling reflexive clitic such as Juan se lavó todos los platos and María se leyó un libro. Though these are traditionally labelled unselected (non-core) agreeing datives or aspectual datives, I argue that this label obscures a relevant difference between two classes of constructions. agentive reflexive clitic (= ARC) constructions are characterized by a uniform set of effects on the external argument (= it must be an agent) and the aspectual interpretation of the VP (= it must be an accomplishment). On the other hand, transitive se clitic (= TSC) constructions do not impose any type of uniform restrictions on the kind of external argument they take or on the aspectual interpretation of the VP. I propose that the difference between these two constructions may be captured by treating se in the ARC construction as the realization of a special vDO head, based on an idea in Folli & Harley (2005), while se in the TSC construction is generated in the complement position of the verb and incorporates into V, forming a complex predicate, following work by De Cuyper (2006), MacDonald (2004, 2008) and MacDonald & Huidobro (2010). It is shown that many of the empirical and theoretical disagreements that plague the literature on the role of non-doubling se in transitive sentences have a simple solution given the new division established here
topic se
non-core datives
intrinsic reflexivity
event structure
non-truth-conditional meaning
url http://www.ub.uit.no/baser/septentrio/index.php/borealis/article/view/2526
work_keys_str_mv AT grantarmstrong agentivereflexivecliticsandtransitiveseconstructionsinspanish
_version_ 1725250183430668288