Agentive reflexive clitics and transitive 'se' constructions in Spanish
This paper investigates the structure of transitive sentences that contain a non-doubling reflexive clitic such as Juan se lavó todos los platos and María se leyó un libro. Though these are traditionally labelled unselected (non-core) agreeing datives or aspectual datives, I argue that this label ob...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Septentrio Academic Publishing
2013-11-01
|
Series: | Borealis: An International Journal of Hispanic Linguistics |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.ub.uit.no/baser/septentrio/index.php/borealis/article/view/2526 |
id |
doaj-f72cf0de09294e4f93fbc01a1ef3aa29 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-f72cf0de09294e4f93fbc01a1ef3aa292020-11-25T00:49:56ZengSeptentrio Academic PublishingBorealis: An International Journal of Hispanic Linguistics1893-32112013-11-01228112810.7557/1.2.2.25262549Agentive reflexive clitics and transitive 'se' constructions in SpanishGrant ArmstrongThis paper investigates the structure of transitive sentences that contain a non-doubling reflexive clitic such as Juan se lavó todos los platos and María se leyó un libro. Though these are traditionally labelled unselected (non-core) agreeing datives or aspectual datives, I argue that this label obscures a relevant difference between two classes of constructions. agentive reflexive clitic (= ARC) constructions are characterized by a uniform set of effects on the external argument (= it must be an agent) and the aspectual interpretation of the VP (= it must be an accomplishment). On the other hand, transitive se clitic (= TSC) constructions do not impose any type of uniform restrictions on the kind of external argument they take or on the aspectual interpretation of the VP. I propose that the difference between these two constructions may be captured by treating se in the ARC construction as the realization of a special vDO head, based on an idea in Folli & Harley (2005), while se in the TSC construction is generated in the complement position of the verb and incorporates into V, forming a complex predicate, following work by De Cuyper (2006), MacDonald (2004, 2008) and MacDonald & Huidobro (2010). It is shown that many of the empirical and theoretical disagreements that plague the literature on the role of non-doubling se in transitive sentences have a simple solution given the new division established herehttp://www.ub.uit.no/baser/septentrio/index.php/borealis/article/view/2526senon-core dativesintrinsic reflexivityevent structurenon-truth-conditional meaning |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Grant Armstrong |
spellingShingle |
Grant Armstrong Agentive reflexive clitics and transitive 'se' constructions in Spanish Borealis: An International Journal of Hispanic Linguistics se non-core datives intrinsic reflexivity event structure non-truth-conditional meaning |
author_facet |
Grant Armstrong |
author_sort |
Grant Armstrong |
title |
Agentive reflexive clitics and transitive 'se' constructions in Spanish |
title_short |
Agentive reflexive clitics and transitive 'se' constructions in Spanish |
title_full |
Agentive reflexive clitics and transitive 'se' constructions in Spanish |
title_fullStr |
Agentive reflexive clitics and transitive 'se' constructions in Spanish |
title_full_unstemmed |
Agentive reflexive clitics and transitive 'se' constructions in Spanish |
title_sort |
agentive reflexive clitics and transitive 'se' constructions in spanish |
publisher |
Septentrio Academic Publishing |
series |
Borealis: An International Journal of Hispanic Linguistics |
issn |
1893-3211 |
publishDate |
2013-11-01 |
description |
This paper investigates the structure of transitive sentences that contain a non-doubling reflexive clitic such as Juan se lavó todos los platos and María se leyó un libro. Though these are traditionally labelled unselected (non-core) agreeing datives or aspectual datives, I argue that this label obscures a relevant difference between two classes of constructions. agentive reflexive clitic (= ARC) constructions are characterized by a uniform set of effects on the external argument (= it must be an agent) and the aspectual interpretation of the VP (= it must be an accomplishment). On the other hand, transitive se clitic (= TSC) constructions do not impose any type of uniform restrictions on the kind of external argument they take or on the aspectual interpretation of the VP. I propose that the difference between these two constructions may be captured by treating se in the ARC construction as the realization of a special vDO head, based on an idea in Folli & Harley (2005), while se in the TSC construction is generated in the complement position of the verb and incorporates into V, forming a complex predicate, following work by De Cuyper (2006), MacDonald (2004, 2008) and MacDonald & Huidobro (2010). It is shown that many of the empirical and theoretical disagreements that plague the literature on the role of non-doubling se in transitive sentences have a simple solution given the new division established here |
topic |
se non-core datives intrinsic reflexivity event structure non-truth-conditional meaning |
url |
http://www.ub.uit.no/baser/septentrio/index.php/borealis/article/view/2526 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT grantarmstrong agentivereflexivecliticsandtransitiveseconstructionsinspanish |
_version_ |
1725250183430668288 |