A comparison of some organizational characteristics of the mouse central retina and the human macula.

Mouse models have greatly assisted our understanding of retinal degenerations. However, the mouse retina does not have a macula, leading to the question of whether the mouse is a relevant model for macular degeneration. In the present study, a quantitative comparison between the organization of the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Stefanie Volland, Julian Esteve-Rudd, Juyea Hoo, Claudine Yee, David S Williams
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2015-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4414478?pdf=render
id doaj-f72c3200519344f1af9ff80556adbd1f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f72c3200519344f1af9ff80556adbd1f2020-11-25T01:00:25ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032015-01-01104e012563110.1371/journal.pone.0125631A comparison of some organizational characteristics of the mouse central retina and the human macula.Stefanie VollandJulian Esteve-RuddJuyea HooClaudine YeeDavid S WilliamsMouse models have greatly assisted our understanding of retinal degenerations. However, the mouse retina does not have a macula, leading to the question of whether the mouse is a relevant model for macular degeneration. In the present study, a quantitative comparison between the organization of the central mouse retina and the human macula was made, focusing on some structural characteristics that have been suggested to be important in predisposing the macula to stresses leading to degeneration: photoreceptor density, phagocytic load on the RPE, and the relative thinness of Bruch's membrane. Light and electron microscopy measurements from retinas of two strains of mice, together with published data on human retinas, were used for calculations and subsequent comparisons. As in the human retina, the central region of the mouse retina possesses a higher photoreceptor cell density and a thinner Bruch's membrane than in the periphery; however, the magnitudes of these periphery to center gradients are larger in the human. Of potentially greater relevance is the actual photoreceptor cell density, which is much greater in the mouse central retina than in the human macula, underlying a higher phagocytic load for the mouse RPE. Moreover, at eccentricities that correspond to the peripheral half of the human macula, the rod to cone ratio is similar between mouse and human. Hence, with respect to photoreceptor density and phagocytic load of the RPE, the central mouse retina models at least the more peripheral part of the macula, where macular degeneration is often first evident.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4414478?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Stefanie Volland
Julian Esteve-Rudd
Juyea Hoo
Claudine Yee
David S Williams
spellingShingle Stefanie Volland
Julian Esteve-Rudd
Juyea Hoo
Claudine Yee
David S Williams
A comparison of some organizational characteristics of the mouse central retina and the human macula.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Stefanie Volland
Julian Esteve-Rudd
Juyea Hoo
Claudine Yee
David S Williams
author_sort Stefanie Volland
title A comparison of some organizational characteristics of the mouse central retina and the human macula.
title_short A comparison of some organizational characteristics of the mouse central retina and the human macula.
title_full A comparison of some organizational characteristics of the mouse central retina and the human macula.
title_fullStr A comparison of some organizational characteristics of the mouse central retina and the human macula.
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of some organizational characteristics of the mouse central retina and the human macula.
title_sort comparison of some organizational characteristics of the mouse central retina and the human macula.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2015-01-01
description Mouse models have greatly assisted our understanding of retinal degenerations. However, the mouse retina does not have a macula, leading to the question of whether the mouse is a relevant model for macular degeneration. In the present study, a quantitative comparison between the organization of the central mouse retina and the human macula was made, focusing on some structural characteristics that have been suggested to be important in predisposing the macula to stresses leading to degeneration: photoreceptor density, phagocytic load on the RPE, and the relative thinness of Bruch's membrane. Light and electron microscopy measurements from retinas of two strains of mice, together with published data on human retinas, were used for calculations and subsequent comparisons. As in the human retina, the central region of the mouse retina possesses a higher photoreceptor cell density and a thinner Bruch's membrane than in the periphery; however, the magnitudes of these periphery to center gradients are larger in the human. Of potentially greater relevance is the actual photoreceptor cell density, which is much greater in the mouse central retina than in the human macula, underlying a higher phagocytic load for the mouse RPE. Moreover, at eccentricities that correspond to the peripheral half of the human macula, the rod to cone ratio is similar between mouse and human. Hence, with respect to photoreceptor density and phagocytic load of the RPE, the central mouse retina models at least the more peripheral part of the macula, where macular degeneration is often first evident.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4414478?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT stefanievolland acomparisonofsomeorganizationalcharacteristicsofthemousecentralretinaandthehumanmacula
AT julianesteverudd acomparisonofsomeorganizationalcharacteristicsofthemousecentralretinaandthehumanmacula
AT juyeahoo acomparisonofsomeorganizationalcharacteristicsofthemousecentralretinaandthehumanmacula
AT claudineyee acomparisonofsomeorganizationalcharacteristicsofthemousecentralretinaandthehumanmacula
AT davidswilliams acomparisonofsomeorganizationalcharacteristicsofthemousecentralretinaandthehumanmacula
AT stefanievolland comparisonofsomeorganizationalcharacteristicsofthemousecentralretinaandthehumanmacula
AT julianesteverudd comparisonofsomeorganizationalcharacteristicsofthemousecentralretinaandthehumanmacula
AT juyeahoo comparisonofsomeorganizationalcharacteristicsofthemousecentralretinaandthehumanmacula
AT claudineyee comparisonofsomeorganizationalcharacteristicsofthemousecentralretinaandthehumanmacula
AT davidswilliams comparisonofsomeorganizationalcharacteristicsofthemousecentralretinaandthehumanmacula
_version_ 1725213524152549376