Safety and feasibility of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer in elderly Japanese patients

Background: This study was conducted to assess the safety and feasibility of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) for elderly Japanese (aged≥70 years) patients with clinically localized prostate cancer (PCa). Methods: From April 2012 to March 2016, a total of 302 consecutive patients with cli...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Masatomo Nishikawa, Hiromitsu Watanabe, Tomofumi Kurahashi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2017-03-01
Series:Prostate International
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2287888216300873
id doaj-f72320fe45744f72a020d7ee8be35b88
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f72320fe45744f72a020d7ee8be35b882020-11-24T21:22:08ZengElsevierProstate International2287-88822017-03-0151131610.1016/j.prnil.2017.01.001Safety and feasibility of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer in elderly Japanese patientsMasatomo NishikawaHiromitsu WatanabeTomofumi KurahashiBackground: This study was conducted to assess the safety and feasibility of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) for elderly Japanese (aged≥70 years) patients with clinically localized prostate cancer (PCa). Methods: From April 2012 to March 2016, a total of 302 consecutive patients with clinically localized PCa underwent RARP at our institute. In this series, 109 (36.1%) and 193 (63.9%) of the patients were divided into older (aged≥70 years) and younger (aged <70 years) groups, respectively. The correlation between the categorized patient age and various clinicopathological factors, including preoperative characteristics, perioperative outcome, and urinary continence outcome after RARP, was retrospectively analyzed. Results: Except for age and Gleason score at biopsy, there was no difference in the preoperative features between the two groups. A nonnerve-sparing RARP was performed more often in the younger group; however, other perioperative variables in the elderly group were comparable to those in the younger group. Similarly, the urinary continence rates at 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months after the surgery were equally favorable in the younger and older groups. Conclusion: RARP may be a reasonable therapeutic option for elderly patients with PCa and provides comparable perioperative and functional outcomes to those in younger patients.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2287888216300873ElderlyFeasibilityProstate cancerRobot-assisted radical prostatectomySafety
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Masatomo Nishikawa
Hiromitsu Watanabe
Tomofumi Kurahashi
spellingShingle Masatomo Nishikawa
Hiromitsu Watanabe
Tomofumi Kurahashi
Safety and feasibility of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer in elderly Japanese patients
Prostate International
Elderly
Feasibility
Prostate cancer
Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy
Safety
author_facet Masatomo Nishikawa
Hiromitsu Watanabe
Tomofumi Kurahashi
author_sort Masatomo Nishikawa
title Safety and feasibility of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer in elderly Japanese patients
title_short Safety and feasibility of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer in elderly Japanese patients
title_full Safety and feasibility of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer in elderly Japanese patients
title_fullStr Safety and feasibility of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer in elderly Japanese patients
title_full_unstemmed Safety and feasibility of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer in elderly Japanese patients
title_sort safety and feasibility of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer in elderly japanese patients
publisher Elsevier
series Prostate International
issn 2287-8882
publishDate 2017-03-01
description Background: This study was conducted to assess the safety and feasibility of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) for elderly Japanese (aged≥70 years) patients with clinically localized prostate cancer (PCa). Methods: From April 2012 to March 2016, a total of 302 consecutive patients with clinically localized PCa underwent RARP at our institute. In this series, 109 (36.1%) and 193 (63.9%) of the patients were divided into older (aged≥70 years) and younger (aged <70 years) groups, respectively. The correlation between the categorized patient age and various clinicopathological factors, including preoperative characteristics, perioperative outcome, and urinary continence outcome after RARP, was retrospectively analyzed. Results: Except for age and Gleason score at biopsy, there was no difference in the preoperative features between the two groups. A nonnerve-sparing RARP was performed more often in the younger group; however, other perioperative variables in the elderly group were comparable to those in the younger group. Similarly, the urinary continence rates at 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months after the surgery were equally favorable in the younger and older groups. Conclusion: RARP may be a reasonable therapeutic option for elderly patients with PCa and provides comparable perioperative and functional outcomes to those in younger patients.
topic Elderly
Feasibility
Prostate cancer
Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy
Safety
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2287888216300873
work_keys_str_mv AT masatomonishikawa safetyandfeasibilityofrobotassistedradicalprostatectomyforclinicallylocalizedprostatecancerinelderlyjapanesepatients
AT hiromitsuwatanabe safetyandfeasibilityofrobotassistedradicalprostatectomyforclinicallylocalizedprostatecancerinelderlyjapanesepatients
AT tomofumikurahashi safetyandfeasibilityofrobotassistedradicalprostatectomyforclinicallylocalizedprostatecancerinelderlyjapanesepatients
_version_ 1725997276974809088