Rural Physician-Pharmacist Collaborative Practice Agreements Managing Patients in Supportive Living and Assisted Living Memory Care Facilities

Setting: Supportive living and assisted living memory care facilities in a rural West-Central Illinois county. Objectives: 1) Evaluate the impact of active pharmacist participation on patient care for residents living in supportive and assisted living facilities, 2) demonstrate feasibility and f...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mattie Ann Haas, LuAnn Haas, Kristine Knoke, Michael Andreski
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Minnesota Libraries Publishing 2019-11-01
Series:INNOVATIONS in Pharmacy
Subjects:
Online Access:https://pubs.lib.umn.edu/index.php/innovations/article/view/1371
id doaj-f6ff4604d8ec49949c42cf06697889c9
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f6ff4604d8ec49949c42cf06697889c92020-11-25T02:53:44ZengUniversity of Minnesota Libraries PublishingINNOVATIONS in Pharmacy2155-04172019-11-0110410.24926/iip.v10i4.1371Rural Physician-Pharmacist Collaborative Practice Agreements Managing Patients in Supportive Living and Assisted Living Memory Care FacilitiesMattie Ann Haas0LuAnn Haas1Kristine Knoke2Michael Andreski3Nauvoo PharmacyNauvoo PharmacyNauvoo PharmacyDrake University College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences Setting: Supportive living and assisted living memory care facilities in a rural West-Central Illinois county. Objectives: 1) Evaluate the impact of active pharmacist participation on patient care for residents living in supportive and assisted living facilities, 2) demonstrate feasibility and financial sustainability of rural community pharmacists providing disease state management services, 3) create processes for best practice to expand the clinical role of the community pharmacist Design: Case study. Interventions: Participating residents received disease state management services provided by a community pharmacist as outlined through collaborative practice agreements with local physicians. The disease states managed included hypertension, hyperlipidemia, diabetes mellitus, and warfarin anticoagulation therapy. The pharmacist completed an initial chart review, initial face-to-face visit, subsequent monthly chart reviews, and monthly face-to-face visits with each resident. Results: During the 6-month period of community pharmacist management, 86 face-to-face visits were completed to deliver a median of 5 visits per resident. The pharmacist identified 23 drug therapy problems with recommended solutions communicated to the resident’s primary care provider. Providers accepted 19 of these recommendations, reflecting an 82.6% acceptance rate. Conclusions: Community pharmacists can feasibly implement enhanced clinical services to assist with disease state management of supportive living and assisted living residents in collaboration with physicians. Pharmacists can provide clinical assessment, education and effective communication to optimize medication management and utilization.   Article Type: Case Study https://pubs.lib.umn.edu/index.php/innovations/article/view/1371Collaborative Practice Agreements (CPA)senior livingruralcommunity pharmacydisease state management
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Mattie Ann Haas
LuAnn Haas
Kristine Knoke
Michael Andreski
spellingShingle Mattie Ann Haas
LuAnn Haas
Kristine Knoke
Michael Andreski
Rural Physician-Pharmacist Collaborative Practice Agreements Managing Patients in Supportive Living and Assisted Living Memory Care Facilities
INNOVATIONS in Pharmacy
Collaborative Practice Agreements (CPA)
senior living
rural
community pharmacy
disease state management
author_facet Mattie Ann Haas
LuAnn Haas
Kristine Knoke
Michael Andreski
author_sort Mattie Ann Haas
title Rural Physician-Pharmacist Collaborative Practice Agreements Managing Patients in Supportive Living and Assisted Living Memory Care Facilities
title_short Rural Physician-Pharmacist Collaborative Practice Agreements Managing Patients in Supportive Living and Assisted Living Memory Care Facilities
title_full Rural Physician-Pharmacist Collaborative Practice Agreements Managing Patients in Supportive Living and Assisted Living Memory Care Facilities
title_fullStr Rural Physician-Pharmacist Collaborative Practice Agreements Managing Patients in Supportive Living and Assisted Living Memory Care Facilities
title_full_unstemmed Rural Physician-Pharmacist Collaborative Practice Agreements Managing Patients in Supportive Living and Assisted Living Memory Care Facilities
title_sort rural physician-pharmacist collaborative practice agreements managing patients in supportive living and assisted living memory care facilities
publisher University of Minnesota Libraries Publishing
series INNOVATIONS in Pharmacy
issn 2155-0417
publishDate 2019-11-01
description Setting: Supportive living and assisted living memory care facilities in a rural West-Central Illinois county. Objectives: 1) Evaluate the impact of active pharmacist participation on patient care for residents living in supportive and assisted living facilities, 2) demonstrate feasibility and financial sustainability of rural community pharmacists providing disease state management services, 3) create processes for best practice to expand the clinical role of the community pharmacist Design: Case study. Interventions: Participating residents received disease state management services provided by a community pharmacist as outlined through collaborative practice agreements with local physicians. The disease states managed included hypertension, hyperlipidemia, diabetes mellitus, and warfarin anticoagulation therapy. The pharmacist completed an initial chart review, initial face-to-face visit, subsequent monthly chart reviews, and monthly face-to-face visits with each resident. Results: During the 6-month period of community pharmacist management, 86 face-to-face visits were completed to deliver a median of 5 visits per resident. The pharmacist identified 23 drug therapy problems with recommended solutions communicated to the resident’s primary care provider. Providers accepted 19 of these recommendations, reflecting an 82.6% acceptance rate. Conclusions: Community pharmacists can feasibly implement enhanced clinical services to assist with disease state management of supportive living and assisted living residents in collaboration with physicians. Pharmacists can provide clinical assessment, education and effective communication to optimize medication management and utilization.   Article Type: Case Study
topic Collaborative Practice Agreements (CPA)
senior living
rural
community pharmacy
disease state management
url https://pubs.lib.umn.edu/index.php/innovations/article/view/1371
work_keys_str_mv AT mattieannhaas ruralphysicianpharmacistcollaborativepracticeagreementsmanagingpatientsinsupportivelivingandassistedlivingmemorycarefacilities
AT luannhaas ruralphysicianpharmacistcollaborativepracticeagreementsmanagingpatientsinsupportivelivingandassistedlivingmemorycarefacilities
AT kristineknoke ruralphysicianpharmacistcollaborativepracticeagreementsmanagingpatientsinsupportivelivingandassistedlivingmemorycarefacilities
AT michaelandreski ruralphysicianpharmacistcollaborativepracticeagreementsmanagingpatientsinsupportivelivingandassistedlivingmemorycarefacilities
_version_ 1724724795768045568