Comparison of Two Commercial Colorimetric Broth Microdilution Tests for <i>Candida</i> Susceptibility Testing: Sensititre YeastOne versus MICRONAUT-AM

Two colorimetric broth microdilution antifungal susceptibility tests were compared, Sensititre YeastOne and MICRONAUT-AM for nine antifungal agents. One hundred clinical <i>Candida</i> isolates were tested, representing a realistic population for susceptibility testing in daily practice....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sophie Philips, Frederik Van Hoecke, Emmanuel De Laere, Steven Vervaeke, Roos De Smedt, Jerina Boelens, Deborah De Geyter, Denis Piérard, Katrien Lagrou
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-05-01
Series:Journal of Fungi
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2309-608X/7/5/356
id doaj-f6fce6d9f746467aad2cff2298549faf
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f6fce6d9f746467aad2cff2298549faf2021-05-31T23:02:08ZengMDPI AGJournal of Fungi2309-608X2021-05-01735635610.3390/jof7050356Comparison of Two Commercial Colorimetric Broth Microdilution Tests for <i>Candida</i> Susceptibility Testing: Sensititre YeastOne versus MICRONAUT-AMSophie Philips0Frederik Van Hoecke1Emmanuel De Laere2Steven Vervaeke3Roos De Smedt4Jerina Boelens5Deborah De Geyter6Denis Piérard7Katrien Lagrou8Department of Laboratory Medicine, AZ Delta Hospital, Deltalaan 1, 8800 Roeselare, BelgiumDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, AZ Delta Hospital, Deltalaan 1, 8800 Roeselare, BelgiumDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, AZ Delta Hospital, Deltalaan 1, 8800 Roeselare, BelgiumDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, AZ Delta Hospital, Deltalaan 1, 8800 Roeselare, BelgiumDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, AZ Delta Hospital, Deltalaan 1, 8800 Roeselare, BelgiumDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Ghent University Hospital, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, 9000 Ghent, BelgiumDepartment of Microbiology and Infection Control, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel (UZ Brussel), Laarbeeklaan 101, 1090 Brussels, BelgiumDepartment of Microbiology and Infection Control, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel (UZ Brussel), Laarbeeklaan 101, 1090 Brussels, BelgiumDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and National Reference Centre for Mycosis, University Hospitals Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000 Leuven, BelgiumTwo colorimetric broth microdilution antifungal susceptibility tests were compared, Sensititre YeastOne and MICRONAUT-AM for nine antifungal agents. One hundred clinical <i>Candida</i> isolates were tested, representing a realistic population for susceptibility testing in daily practice. The reproducibility characteristics were comparable. Only for fluconazole, caspofungin, 5-flucytosine and amphotericin B, an essential agreement of ≥90% could be demonstrated. Sensititre minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were systematically higher than MICRONAUT MICs for all antifungals, except for itraconazole. CLSI clinical breakpoints (CBPs) and epidemiological cut-off values (ECVs) were used for Sensititre MICs while for MICRONAUT the EUCAST CBPs and ECVs were used. Only fluconazole, micafungin, and amphotericin B had a categorical agreement of ≥90%. For fluconazole, micafungin, and amphotericin B the susceptibility proportions were comparable. Susceptibility proportion of posaconazole and voriconazole was higher using the MICRONAUT system. For itraconazole and anidulafungin, the susceptibility proportion was higher using Sensititre. It was not possible to determine the true MIC values or the correctness of a S/I/R result since both commercial systems were validated against a different reference method. These findings show that there is a significant variability in susceptibility pattern and consequently on use of antifungals in daily practice, depending on the choice of commercial system.https://www.mdpi.com/2309-608X/7/5/356<i>Candida</i>antifungal agentsantifungal susceptibility testingcolorimetryCLSIEUCAST
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sophie Philips
Frederik Van Hoecke
Emmanuel De Laere
Steven Vervaeke
Roos De Smedt
Jerina Boelens
Deborah De Geyter
Denis Piérard
Katrien Lagrou
spellingShingle Sophie Philips
Frederik Van Hoecke
Emmanuel De Laere
Steven Vervaeke
Roos De Smedt
Jerina Boelens
Deborah De Geyter
Denis Piérard
Katrien Lagrou
Comparison of Two Commercial Colorimetric Broth Microdilution Tests for <i>Candida</i> Susceptibility Testing: Sensititre YeastOne versus MICRONAUT-AM
Journal of Fungi
<i>Candida</i>
antifungal agents
antifungal susceptibility testing
colorimetry
CLSI
EUCAST
author_facet Sophie Philips
Frederik Van Hoecke
Emmanuel De Laere
Steven Vervaeke
Roos De Smedt
Jerina Boelens
Deborah De Geyter
Denis Piérard
Katrien Lagrou
author_sort Sophie Philips
title Comparison of Two Commercial Colorimetric Broth Microdilution Tests for <i>Candida</i> Susceptibility Testing: Sensititre YeastOne versus MICRONAUT-AM
title_short Comparison of Two Commercial Colorimetric Broth Microdilution Tests for <i>Candida</i> Susceptibility Testing: Sensititre YeastOne versus MICRONAUT-AM
title_full Comparison of Two Commercial Colorimetric Broth Microdilution Tests for <i>Candida</i> Susceptibility Testing: Sensititre YeastOne versus MICRONAUT-AM
title_fullStr Comparison of Two Commercial Colorimetric Broth Microdilution Tests for <i>Candida</i> Susceptibility Testing: Sensititre YeastOne versus MICRONAUT-AM
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Two Commercial Colorimetric Broth Microdilution Tests for <i>Candida</i> Susceptibility Testing: Sensititre YeastOne versus MICRONAUT-AM
title_sort comparison of two commercial colorimetric broth microdilution tests for <i>candida</i> susceptibility testing: sensititre yeastone versus micronaut-am
publisher MDPI AG
series Journal of Fungi
issn 2309-608X
publishDate 2021-05-01
description Two colorimetric broth microdilution antifungal susceptibility tests were compared, Sensititre YeastOne and MICRONAUT-AM for nine antifungal agents. One hundred clinical <i>Candida</i> isolates were tested, representing a realistic population for susceptibility testing in daily practice. The reproducibility characteristics were comparable. Only for fluconazole, caspofungin, 5-flucytosine and amphotericin B, an essential agreement of ≥90% could be demonstrated. Sensititre minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were systematically higher than MICRONAUT MICs for all antifungals, except for itraconazole. CLSI clinical breakpoints (CBPs) and epidemiological cut-off values (ECVs) were used for Sensititre MICs while for MICRONAUT the EUCAST CBPs and ECVs were used. Only fluconazole, micafungin, and amphotericin B had a categorical agreement of ≥90%. For fluconazole, micafungin, and amphotericin B the susceptibility proportions were comparable. Susceptibility proportion of posaconazole and voriconazole was higher using the MICRONAUT system. For itraconazole and anidulafungin, the susceptibility proportion was higher using Sensititre. It was not possible to determine the true MIC values or the correctness of a S/I/R result since both commercial systems were validated against a different reference method. These findings show that there is a significant variability in susceptibility pattern and consequently on use of antifungals in daily practice, depending on the choice of commercial system.
topic <i>Candida</i>
antifungal agents
antifungal susceptibility testing
colorimetry
CLSI
EUCAST
url https://www.mdpi.com/2309-608X/7/5/356
work_keys_str_mv AT sophiephilips comparisonoftwocommercialcolorimetricbrothmicrodilutiontestsforicandidaisusceptibilitytestingsensititreyeastoneversusmicronautam
AT frederikvanhoecke comparisonoftwocommercialcolorimetricbrothmicrodilutiontestsforicandidaisusceptibilitytestingsensititreyeastoneversusmicronautam
AT emmanueldelaere comparisonoftwocommercialcolorimetricbrothmicrodilutiontestsforicandidaisusceptibilitytestingsensititreyeastoneversusmicronautam
AT stevenvervaeke comparisonoftwocommercialcolorimetricbrothmicrodilutiontestsforicandidaisusceptibilitytestingsensititreyeastoneversusmicronautam
AT roosdesmedt comparisonoftwocommercialcolorimetricbrothmicrodilutiontestsforicandidaisusceptibilitytestingsensititreyeastoneversusmicronautam
AT jerinaboelens comparisonoftwocommercialcolorimetricbrothmicrodilutiontestsforicandidaisusceptibilitytestingsensititreyeastoneversusmicronautam
AT deborahdegeyter comparisonoftwocommercialcolorimetricbrothmicrodilutiontestsforicandidaisusceptibilitytestingsensititreyeastoneversusmicronautam
AT denispierard comparisonoftwocommercialcolorimetricbrothmicrodilutiontestsforicandidaisusceptibilitytestingsensititreyeastoneversusmicronautam
AT katrienlagrou comparisonoftwocommercialcolorimetricbrothmicrodilutiontestsforicandidaisusceptibilitytestingsensititreyeastoneversusmicronautam
_version_ 1721418568067710976