Adapting the EDuMaP method to test the performance of the Norwegian early warning system for weather-induced landslides
The Norwegian national landslide early warning system (LEWS), operational since 2013, is managed by the Norwegian Water Resources and Energy Directorate and was designed for monitoring and forecasting the hydrometeorological conditions potentially triggering slope failures. Decision-making in th...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Copernicus Publications
2017-06-01
|
Series: | Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences |
Online Access: | http://www.nat-hazards-earth-syst-sci.net/17/817/2017/nhess-17-817-2017.pdf |
Summary: | The Norwegian national landslide early warning system (LEWS), operational
since 2013, is managed by the Norwegian Water Resources and Energy
Directorate and was designed for monitoring and forecasting the
hydrometeorological conditions potentially triggering slope failures.
Decision-making in the LEWS is based upon rainfall thresholds,
hydrometeorological and real-time landslide observations as well as on
landslide inventory and susceptibility maps. Daily alerts are issued
throughout the country considering variable size warning zones. Warnings are
issued once per day for the following 3 days and can be updated according to
weather forecasts and information gathered by the monitoring network. The
performance of the LEWS operational in Norway has been evaluated applying
the EDuMaP method, which is based on the computation of a duration matrix
relating number of landslides and warning levels issued in a warning zone.
In the past, this method has been exclusively employed to analyse the
performance of regional early warning models considering fixed warning zones.
Herein, an original approach is proposed for the computation of the elements
of the duration matrix in the case of early warning models issuing alerts on
variable size areas. The approach has been used to evaluate the warnings
issued in Western Norway, in the period 2013–2014, considering two datasets
of landslides. The results indicate that the landslide datasets do not
significantly influence the performance evaluation, although a slightly
better performance is registered for the smallest dataset. Different
performance results are observed as a function of the values adopted for one
of the most important input parameters of EDuMaP, the landslide density
criterion (i.e. setting the thresholds to differentiate among classes of
landslide events). To investigate this issue, a parametric analysis has been
conducted; the results of the analysis show significant differences among
computed performances when absolute or relative landslide density criteria
are considered. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1561-8633 1684-9981 |