What Do We Know About Psi? The First Decade of Remote Viewing Research and Operations at Stanford Research Institute

Beginning 1972, three physicists at Stanford Research Institute (now known as SRI International)––Harold Puthoff, Edwin May, and Russell Targ––initiated free-response remote viewing experiments with psi gifted participants. The percipients were asked to describe their mental images with regard to so...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Russell Targ
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SSE 2019-12-01
Series:Journal of Scientific Exploration
Online Access:https://journalofscientificexploration.org/index.php/jse/article/view/1669
id doaj-f6d85d7a9b2147e9b8b3500bf7683c9d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f6d85d7a9b2147e9b8b3500bf7683c9d2020-11-25T02:46:41ZengSSEJournal of Scientific Exploration0892-33102019-12-01334What Do We Know About Psi? The First Decade of Remote Viewing Research and Operations at Stanford Research InstituteRussell TargBeginning 1972, three physicists at Stanford Research Institute (now known as SRI International)––Harold Puthoff, Edwin May, and Russell Targ––initiated free-response remote viewing experiments with psi gifted participants. The percipients were asked to describe their mental images with regard to some person or event distant in space and time. Many of our experimental series were statistically significant at four standard deviations from chance expectation, with effect sizes greater than 0.6. From these highly efficient experiments, we concluded that the accuracy and reliability of remote viewing is independent of distance up to 10,000 km, and of time up to several days into the future. Psi ability clearly violates our ordinary ideas of causality, since future events are seen to be the cause or trigger for experiences at an earlier time. We also learned that feedback to the viewer is helpful, but it is not necessary. Remote viewing is a nonanalytic ability; describing a distant shape, form, or location on the planet is easier than guessing a number from 1 to 10. The purpose of this paper is to correct the misconception that psi is weak and unreliable. On the contrary, in our laboratory experiments and classified operational tasks psi was found to be surprisingly reliable and useful. https://journalofscientificexploration.org/index.php/jse/article/view/1669
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Russell Targ
spellingShingle Russell Targ
What Do We Know About Psi? The First Decade of Remote Viewing Research and Operations at Stanford Research Institute
Journal of Scientific Exploration
author_facet Russell Targ
author_sort Russell Targ
title What Do We Know About Psi? The First Decade of Remote Viewing Research and Operations at Stanford Research Institute
title_short What Do We Know About Psi? The First Decade of Remote Viewing Research and Operations at Stanford Research Institute
title_full What Do We Know About Psi? The First Decade of Remote Viewing Research and Operations at Stanford Research Institute
title_fullStr What Do We Know About Psi? The First Decade of Remote Viewing Research and Operations at Stanford Research Institute
title_full_unstemmed What Do We Know About Psi? The First Decade of Remote Viewing Research and Operations at Stanford Research Institute
title_sort what do we know about psi? the first decade of remote viewing research and operations at stanford research institute
publisher SSE
series Journal of Scientific Exploration
issn 0892-3310
publishDate 2019-12-01
description Beginning 1972, three physicists at Stanford Research Institute (now known as SRI International)––Harold Puthoff, Edwin May, and Russell Targ––initiated free-response remote viewing experiments with psi gifted participants. The percipients were asked to describe their mental images with regard to some person or event distant in space and time. Many of our experimental series were statistically significant at four standard deviations from chance expectation, with effect sizes greater than 0.6. From these highly efficient experiments, we concluded that the accuracy and reliability of remote viewing is independent of distance up to 10,000 km, and of time up to several days into the future. Psi ability clearly violates our ordinary ideas of causality, since future events are seen to be the cause or trigger for experiences at an earlier time. We also learned that feedback to the viewer is helpful, but it is not necessary. Remote viewing is a nonanalytic ability; describing a distant shape, form, or location on the planet is easier than guessing a number from 1 to 10. The purpose of this paper is to correct the misconception that psi is weak and unreliable. On the contrary, in our laboratory experiments and classified operational tasks psi was found to be surprisingly reliable and useful.
url https://journalofscientificexploration.org/index.php/jse/article/view/1669
work_keys_str_mv AT russelltarg whatdoweknowaboutpsithefirstdecadeofremoteviewingresearchandoperationsatstanfordresearchinstitute
_version_ 1724756641191034880