Towards integrated physical activity profiling.

Recently, there has been some discussion of whether it is possible to score highly in one dimension of physical activity behaviour (e.g., moderate intensity exercise) whilst also scoring poorly in another (e.g., sedentary time). Interestingly, direct empirical observations to support these proposals...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Dylan Thompson, Alan M Batterham
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2013-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3577906?pdf=render
id doaj-f6d41f192d7f451fa523101ae97dbbd6
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f6d41f192d7f451fa523101ae97dbbd62020-11-25T02:28:18ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032013-01-0182e5642710.1371/journal.pone.0056427Towards integrated physical activity profiling.Dylan ThompsonAlan M BatterhamRecently, there has been some discussion of whether it is possible to score highly in one dimension of physical activity behaviour (e.g., moderate intensity exercise) whilst also scoring poorly in another (e.g., sedentary time). Interestingly, direct empirical observations to support these proposals are lacking. New technologies now enable the capture of physical activity thermogenesis on a minute-by-minute basis and over a sustained period. We used one of the best available technologies to explore whether individuals can score differently in various physiologically-important physical activity dimensions. We determined minute-by-minute physical activity energy expenditure over 7 days in 100 men aged 28 ± 9 years. We used combined accelerometry and heart rate with branched equation modelling to estimate energy expenditure and extracted data for key physical activity outcomes and descriptors. Although some physical activity outcomes were tightly correlated, the attainment of one threshold for a given physical activity dimension did not automatically predict how well an individual scored in another dimension (with bivariate correlations ranging from 0.05 to 0.96). In one illustrative example of this heterogeneity, although 41 men showed a relatively low Physical Activity Level (total energy expenditure/resting energy expenditure ≤ 1.75), only 17% (n=7) of these men showed consistently low physical activity across other dimensions (moderate intensity activity, vigorous intensity activity, and sedentary time). Thus, physical activity is highly heterogeneous and there is no single outcome measure that captures all the relevant information about a given individual. We propose that future studies need to capture (rather than ignore) the different physiologically-important dimensions of physical activity via generation of integrated, multidimensional physical activity 'profiles'.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3577906?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Dylan Thompson
Alan M Batterham
spellingShingle Dylan Thompson
Alan M Batterham
Towards integrated physical activity profiling.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Dylan Thompson
Alan M Batterham
author_sort Dylan Thompson
title Towards integrated physical activity profiling.
title_short Towards integrated physical activity profiling.
title_full Towards integrated physical activity profiling.
title_fullStr Towards integrated physical activity profiling.
title_full_unstemmed Towards integrated physical activity profiling.
title_sort towards integrated physical activity profiling.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2013-01-01
description Recently, there has been some discussion of whether it is possible to score highly in one dimension of physical activity behaviour (e.g., moderate intensity exercise) whilst also scoring poorly in another (e.g., sedentary time). Interestingly, direct empirical observations to support these proposals are lacking. New technologies now enable the capture of physical activity thermogenesis on a minute-by-minute basis and over a sustained period. We used one of the best available technologies to explore whether individuals can score differently in various physiologically-important physical activity dimensions. We determined minute-by-minute physical activity energy expenditure over 7 days in 100 men aged 28 ± 9 years. We used combined accelerometry and heart rate with branched equation modelling to estimate energy expenditure and extracted data for key physical activity outcomes and descriptors. Although some physical activity outcomes were tightly correlated, the attainment of one threshold for a given physical activity dimension did not automatically predict how well an individual scored in another dimension (with bivariate correlations ranging from 0.05 to 0.96). In one illustrative example of this heterogeneity, although 41 men showed a relatively low Physical Activity Level (total energy expenditure/resting energy expenditure ≤ 1.75), only 17% (n=7) of these men showed consistently low physical activity across other dimensions (moderate intensity activity, vigorous intensity activity, and sedentary time). Thus, physical activity is highly heterogeneous and there is no single outcome measure that captures all the relevant information about a given individual. We propose that future studies need to capture (rather than ignore) the different physiologically-important dimensions of physical activity via generation of integrated, multidimensional physical activity 'profiles'.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3577906?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT dylanthompson towardsintegratedphysicalactivityprofiling
AT alanmbatterham towardsintegratedphysicalactivityprofiling
_version_ 1724839095250714624