Comparison of the immune responses induced by chimeric alphavirus-vectored and formalin-inactivated alum-precipitated measles vaccines in mice.

A variety of vaccine platforms are under study for development of new vaccines for measles. Problems with past measles vaccines are incompletely understood and underscore the need to understand the types of immune responses induced by different types of vaccines. Detailed immune response evaluation...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: M Jeff Bergen, Chien-Hsiung Pan, Catherine E Greer, Harold S Legg, John M Polo, Diane E Griffin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2010-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC2858653?pdf=render
id doaj-f6c5fc98738144dabb8a0cabc0520c8b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f6c5fc98738144dabb8a0cabc0520c8b2020-11-25T01:47:20ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032010-01-0154e1029710.1371/journal.pone.0010297Comparison of the immune responses induced by chimeric alphavirus-vectored and formalin-inactivated alum-precipitated measles vaccines in mice.M Jeff BergenChien-Hsiung PanCatherine E GreerHarold S LeggJohn M PoloDiane E GriffinA variety of vaccine platforms are under study for development of new vaccines for measles. Problems with past measles vaccines are incompletely understood and underscore the need to understand the types of immune responses induced by different types of vaccines. Detailed immune response evaluation is most easily performed in mice. Although mice are not susceptible to infection with wild type or vaccine strains of measles virus, they can be used for comparative evaluation of the immune responses to measles vaccines of other types. In this study we compared the immune responses in mice to a new protective alphavirus replicon particle vaccine expressing the measles virus hemagglutinin (VEE/SIN-H) with a non-protective formalin-inactivated, alum-precipitated measles vaccine (FI-MV). MV-specific IgG levels were similar, but VEE/SIN-H antibody was high avidity IgG2a with neutralizing activity while FI-MV antibody was low-avidity IgG1 without neutralizing activity. FI-MV antibody was primarily against the nucleoprotein with no priming to H. Germinal centers appeared, peaked and resolved later for FI-MV. Lymph node MV antibody-secreting cells were more numerous after FI-MV than VEE/SIN-H, but were similar in the bone marrow. VEE/SIN-H-induced T cells produced IFN-gamma and IL-4 both spontaneously ex vivo and after stimulation, while FI-MV-induced T cells produced IL-4 only after stimulation. In summary, VEE/SIN-H induced a balanced T cell response and high avidity neutralizing IgG2a while FI-MV induced a type 2 T cell response, abundant plasmablasts, late germinal centers and low avidity non-neutralizing IgG1 against the nucleoprotein.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC2858653?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author M Jeff Bergen
Chien-Hsiung Pan
Catherine E Greer
Harold S Legg
John M Polo
Diane E Griffin
spellingShingle M Jeff Bergen
Chien-Hsiung Pan
Catherine E Greer
Harold S Legg
John M Polo
Diane E Griffin
Comparison of the immune responses induced by chimeric alphavirus-vectored and formalin-inactivated alum-precipitated measles vaccines in mice.
PLoS ONE
author_facet M Jeff Bergen
Chien-Hsiung Pan
Catherine E Greer
Harold S Legg
John M Polo
Diane E Griffin
author_sort M Jeff Bergen
title Comparison of the immune responses induced by chimeric alphavirus-vectored and formalin-inactivated alum-precipitated measles vaccines in mice.
title_short Comparison of the immune responses induced by chimeric alphavirus-vectored and formalin-inactivated alum-precipitated measles vaccines in mice.
title_full Comparison of the immune responses induced by chimeric alphavirus-vectored and formalin-inactivated alum-precipitated measles vaccines in mice.
title_fullStr Comparison of the immune responses induced by chimeric alphavirus-vectored and formalin-inactivated alum-precipitated measles vaccines in mice.
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the immune responses induced by chimeric alphavirus-vectored and formalin-inactivated alum-precipitated measles vaccines in mice.
title_sort comparison of the immune responses induced by chimeric alphavirus-vectored and formalin-inactivated alum-precipitated measles vaccines in mice.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2010-01-01
description A variety of vaccine platforms are under study for development of new vaccines for measles. Problems with past measles vaccines are incompletely understood and underscore the need to understand the types of immune responses induced by different types of vaccines. Detailed immune response evaluation is most easily performed in mice. Although mice are not susceptible to infection with wild type or vaccine strains of measles virus, they can be used for comparative evaluation of the immune responses to measles vaccines of other types. In this study we compared the immune responses in mice to a new protective alphavirus replicon particle vaccine expressing the measles virus hemagglutinin (VEE/SIN-H) with a non-protective formalin-inactivated, alum-precipitated measles vaccine (FI-MV). MV-specific IgG levels were similar, but VEE/SIN-H antibody was high avidity IgG2a with neutralizing activity while FI-MV antibody was low-avidity IgG1 without neutralizing activity. FI-MV antibody was primarily against the nucleoprotein with no priming to H. Germinal centers appeared, peaked and resolved later for FI-MV. Lymph node MV antibody-secreting cells were more numerous after FI-MV than VEE/SIN-H, but were similar in the bone marrow. VEE/SIN-H-induced T cells produced IFN-gamma and IL-4 both spontaneously ex vivo and after stimulation, while FI-MV-induced T cells produced IL-4 only after stimulation. In summary, VEE/SIN-H induced a balanced T cell response and high avidity neutralizing IgG2a while FI-MV induced a type 2 T cell response, abundant plasmablasts, late germinal centers and low avidity non-neutralizing IgG1 against the nucleoprotein.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC2858653?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT mjeffbergen comparisonoftheimmuneresponsesinducedbychimericalphavirusvectoredandformalininactivatedalumprecipitatedmeaslesvaccinesinmice
AT chienhsiungpan comparisonoftheimmuneresponsesinducedbychimericalphavirusvectoredandformalininactivatedalumprecipitatedmeaslesvaccinesinmice
AT catherineegreer comparisonoftheimmuneresponsesinducedbychimericalphavirusvectoredandformalininactivatedalumprecipitatedmeaslesvaccinesinmice
AT haroldslegg comparisonoftheimmuneresponsesinducedbychimericalphavirusvectoredandformalininactivatedalumprecipitatedmeaslesvaccinesinmice
AT johnmpolo comparisonoftheimmuneresponsesinducedbychimericalphavirusvectoredandformalininactivatedalumprecipitatedmeaslesvaccinesinmice
AT dianeegriffin comparisonoftheimmuneresponsesinducedbychimericalphavirusvectoredandformalininactivatedalumprecipitatedmeaslesvaccinesinmice
_version_ 1725014887425376256