Telemedicine as a Therapeutic Option in Sports Medicine: Results of a Nationwide Cross-Sectional Study among Physicians and Patients in Germany

Background: Worldwide, the number of treatments in the field of sports medicine is increasing. However, the COVID-19 pandemic has changed everyday life. Many consultations had to be cancelled, postponed, or converted to a virtual format. Telemedicine in sports medicine could support physicians. This...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Stefan Hertling, Franziska Maria Loos, Isabel Graul
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-07-01
Series:International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/13/7110
id doaj-f6b7e809cd8c4b748287eaf3ee6fdc45
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f6b7e809cd8c4b748287eaf3ee6fdc452021-07-15T15:35:47ZengMDPI AGInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health1661-78271660-46012021-07-01187110711010.3390/ijerph18137110Telemedicine as a Therapeutic Option in Sports Medicine: Results of a Nationwide Cross-Sectional Study among Physicians and Patients in GermanyStefan Hertling0Franziska Maria Loos1Isabel Graul2Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Jena, 07747 Jena, GermanyPractice for Orthopedics and Shoulder Surgery, 04177 Leipzig, GermanyOrthopedic Department, Campus Eisenberg, University Hospital Jena, 07607 Eisenberg, GermanyBackground: Worldwide, the number of treatments in the field of sports medicine is increasing. However, the COVID-19 pandemic has changed everyday life. Many consultations had to be cancelled, postponed, or converted to a virtual format. Telemedicine in sports medicine could support physicians. This study analyzes the use and perception of telemedicine applications among physicians and patients in the field of sports medicine in Germany. Methods: This prospective cross-sectional study was based on a survey of sports medicine physicians and patients in Germany during the COVID-19 pandemic. Descriptive statistics were calculated. Results: We analyzed the responses of 729 patients and 702 sports medicine physicians. Most believed that telemedicine is useful. Both physicians and patients rated their knowledge of telemedicine as unsatisfactory. The majority of respondents said they do not currently use telemedicine but would like to do so. Patients and physicians reported that their attitude had changed positively towards telemedicine and that their usage had increased due to COVID-19. The majority in both groups agreed on implementing virtual visits in stable disease conditions. Telemedicine was considered helpful for follow-up monitoring and prevention by both groups. Conclusion: Telemedicine in sports medicine has seen limited use but is highly accepted among physicians and patients alike. The absence of a structured framework is an obstacle to effective implementation. Training courses should be introduced to improve the limited knowledge regarding the use of telemedicine. More research in telemedicine in sports medicine is needed. This includes large-scale randomized controlled trials, economic analyses and explorations of user preferences.https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/13/7110eHealthtelemedicinehealth services researchCOVID-19sports medicinedigitalization
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Stefan Hertling
Franziska Maria Loos
Isabel Graul
spellingShingle Stefan Hertling
Franziska Maria Loos
Isabel Graul
Telemedicine as a Therapeutic Option in Sports Medicine: Results of a Nationwide Cross-Sectional Study among Physicians and Patients in Germany
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
eHealth
telemedicine
health services research
COVID-19
sports medicine
digitalization
author_facet Stefan Hertling
Franziska Maria Loos
Isabel Graul
author_sort Stefan Hertling
title Telemedicine as a Therapeutic Option in Sports Medicine: Results of a Nationwide Cross-Sectional Study among Physicians and Patients in Germany
title_short Telemedicine as a Therapeutic Option in Sports Medicine: Results of a Nationwide Cross-Sectional Study among Physicians and Patients in Germany
title_full Telemedicine as a Therapeutic Option in Sports Medicine: Results of a Nationwide Cross-Sectional Study among Physicians and Patients in Germany
title_fullStr Telemedicine as a Therapeutic Option in Sports Medicine: Results of a Nationwide Cross-Sectional Study among Physicians and Patients in Germany
title_full_unstemmed Telemedicine as a Therapeutic Option in Sports Medicine: Results of a Nationwide Cross-Sectional Study among Physicians and Patients in Germany
title_sort telemedicine as a therapeutic option in sports medicine: results of a nationwide cross-sectional study among physicians and patients in germany
publisher MDPI AG
series International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
issn 1661-7827
1660-4601
publishDate 2021-07-01
description Background: Worldwide, the number of treatments in the field of sports medicine is increasing. However, the COVID-19 pandemic has changed everyday life. Many consultations had to be cancelled, postponed, or converted to a virtual format. Telemedicine in sports medicine could support physicians. This study analyzes the use and perception of telemedicine applications among physicians and patients in the field of sports medicine in Germany. Methods: This prospective cross-sectional study was based on a survey of sports medicine physicians and patients in Germany during the COVID-19 pandemic. Descriptive statistics were calculated. Results: We analyzed the responses of 729 patients and 702 sports medicine physicians. Most believed that telemedicine is useful. Both physicians and patients rated their knowledge of telemedicine as unsatisfactory. The majority of respondents said they do not currently use telemedicine but would like to do so. Patients and physicians reported that their attitude had changed positively towards telemedicine and that their usage had increased due to COVID-19. The majority in both groups agreed on implementing virtual visits in stable disease conditions. Telemedicine was considered helpful for follow-up monitoring and prevention by both groups. Conclusion: Telemedicine in sports medicine has seen limited use but is highly accepted among physicians and patients alike. The absence of a structured framework is an obstacle to effective implementation. Training courses should be introduced to improve the limited knowledge regarding the use of telemedicine. More research in telemedicine in sports medicine is needed. This includes large-scale randomized controlled trials, economic analyses and explorations of user preferences.
topic eHealth
telemedicine
health services research
COVID-19
sports medicine
digitalization
url https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/13/7110
work_keys_str_mv AT stefanhertling telemedicineasatherapeuticoptioninsportsmedicineresultsofanationwidecrosssectionalstudyamongphysiciansandpatientsingermany
AT franziskamarialoos telemedicineasatherapeuticoptioninsportsmedicineresultsofanationwidecrosssectionalstudyamongphysiciansandpatientsingermany
AT isabelgraul telemedicineasatherapeuticoptioninsportsmedicineresultsofanationwidecrosssectionalstudyamongphysiciansandpatientsingermany
_version_ 1721299506861965312