An Optimization Method for the Layout of Soil Humidity Sensors Based on Compressed Sensing

In the farmland Internet of Things, to achieve precise control of production, it is necessary to obtain more data support, which requires the deployment of many sensors, and this will inevitably bring about high investment and high-cost problems. This paper mainly studies the optimization of sensor...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yunsong Jia, Xueyun Tian, Xin Chen, Xiang Li
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2021-01-01
Series:Journal of Sensors
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/9901990
Description
Summary:In the farmland Internet of Things, to achieve precise control of production, it is necessary to obtain more data support, which requires the deployment of many sensors, and this will inevitably bring about high investment and high-cost problems. This paper mainly studies the optimization of sensor placement in the agricultural field. Through compressed sensing and algorithm optimization, the number of sensors used is reduced and the cost is reduced on the premise of ensuring the effect. At present, there are many mature sensor layout optimization methods, but these methods will have incomplete parameters due to experimental conditions and environmental factors. They are more suitable for structural health monitoring and lack research in agricultural applications. Considering that the sensor layout optimization can be converted into the characteristics of image compression selection and the compression effect of the compressed sensing theory is better, therefore, this paper proposes a sensor layout optimization method based on compressed sensing. Due to the structural characteristics of the existing measurement matrix in the compressed sensing theory, the specific position distribution of the optimized sensor layout cannot be obtained directly. This paper improves the existing sparse random measurement matrix to determine the number of sensors required for a given region and the function of the specific location of each sensor. The experimental results show that soil moisture can be measured with a small error of 0.91 by using 1/3 of the original sensor number. The result of data reconstruction using 1/6 of the original sensor is average, and the average error is up to 1.68, which is suitable for the environment with small data fluctuation.
ISSN:1687-7268