In gov we trust: the less we pay for improved electricity supply in Ghana

Abstract Background Ghana is bedeviled with the lack of 24-h supply of electricity. This holds back economic growth and sustainable development prospects. Several studies have investigated varied factors that account for household’s willingness-to-pay (WTP) for improved electricity services. However...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Anthony Amoah, Davis Adu Larbi, Daniel Offei, Anthony Panin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2017-09-01
Series:Energy, Sustainability and Society
Subjects:
WTP
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13705-017-0133-0
id doaj-f69935ec59324cb0afbce16ea776f0e6
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f69935ec59324cb0afbce16ea776f0e62020-11-25T00:24:59ZengBMCEnergy, Sustainability and Society2192-05672017-09-01711910.1186/s13705-017-0133-0In gov we trust: the less we pay for improved electricity supply in GhanaAnthony Amoah0Davis Adu Larbi1Daniel Offei2Anthony Panin3Central UniversityCentral UniversityCentral UniversityCentral UniversityAbstract Background Ghana is bedeviled with the lack of 24-h supply of electricity. This holds back economic growth and sustainable development prospects. Several studies have investigated varied factors that account for household’s willingness-to-pay (WTP) for improved electricity services. However, not much is known about the role of trust as a proxy for social capital and household’s WTP for improved electricity services. We hypothesize that trust (social capital) is a key factor in determining households WTP for a 24-h supply of electricity in Ghana, a service which is largely controlled by the government. Methods This study uses primary data collected in a survey of households and applies the well-known and widely used Contingent Valuation Method (CVM) to estimate how much households who trust and those who do not trust in the government are willing to pay for a 24-h supply of electricity. Results We have evidence that trust in the government is statistically significant and varies negatively with WTP for improved electricity supply. In line with our hypothesis and the few existing studies on trust-WTP relationship, we conclude that trust plays a key role in determining WTP for improved electricity services in Ghana. Our estimates which are downward biased constitute 15–17% of household’s income. Conclusions To advance the course of generating funds to sustain the supply of a 24-h supply of electricity, this study argues based on the evidence from the trust-WTP relationship that most households do not trust the government in the provision of efficient electricity services. Those who trust the government are currently not willing to pay more for an improved electricity service because they believed the promises made to them by politicians that they would be provided with an improved service without them having to pay more. We recommend that government (politicians) should not trivialize anything that bothers on trust as it is not without its associated consequences on consumer’s WTP behaviour. Secondly, for efficient provision of improved electricity supply, policymakers should commence educating citizens on the unsustainability of government’s provision given its limited budget and explore private sector options.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13705-017-0133-0Contingent Valuation MethodWTPSocial capitalTrustElectricity
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Anthony Amoah
Davis Adu Larbi
Daniel Offei
Anthony Panin
spellingShingle Anthony Amoah
Davis Adu Larbi
Daniel Offei
Anthony Panin
In gov we trust: the less we pay for improved electricity supply in Ghana
Energy, Sustainability and Society
Contingent Valuation Method
WTP
Social capital
Trust
Electricity
author_facet Anthony Amoah
Davis Adu Larbi
Daniel Offei
Anthony Panin
author_sort Anthony Amoah
title In gov we trust: the less we pay for improved electricity supply in Ghana
title_short In gov we trust: the less we pay for improved electricity supply in Ghana
title_full In gov we trust: the less we pay for improved electricity supply in Ghana
title_fullStr In gov we trust: the less we pay for improved electricity supply in Ghana
title_full_unstemmed In gov we trust: the less we pay for improved electricity supply in Ghana
title_sort in gov we trust: the less we pay for improved electricity supply in ghana
publisher BMC
series Energy, Sustainability and Society
issn 2192-0567
publishDate 2017-09-01
description Abstract Background Ghana is bedeviled with the lack of 24-h supply of electricity. This holds back economic growth and sustainable development prospects. Several studies have investigated varied factors that account for household’s willingness-to-pay (WTP) for improved electricity services. However, not much is known about the role of trust as a proxy for social capital and household’s WTP for improved electricity services. We hypothesize that trust (social capital) is a key factor in determining households WTP for a 24-h supply of electricity in Ghana, a service which is largely controlled by the government. Methods This study uses primary data collected in a survey of households and applies the well-known and widely used Contingent Valuation Method (CVM) to estimate how much households who trust and those who do not trust in the government are willing to pay for a 24-h supply of electricity. Results We have evidence that trust in the government is statistically significant and varies negatively with WTP for improved electricity supply. In line with our hypothesis and the few existing studies on trust-WTP relationship, we conclude that trust plays a key role in determining WTP for improved electricity services in Ghana. Our estimates which are downward biased constitute 15–17% of household’s income. Conclusions To advance the course of generating funds to sustain the supply of a 24-h supply of electricity, this study argues based on the evidence from the trust-WTP relationship that most households do not trust the government in the provision of efficient electricity services. Those who trust the government are currently not willing to pay more for an improved electricity service because they believed the promises made to them by politicians that they would be provided with an improved service without them having to pay more. We recommend that government (politicians) should not trivialize anything that bothers on trust as it is not without its associated consequences on consumer’s WTP behaviour. Secondly, for efficient provision of improved electricity supply, policymakers should commence educating citizens on the unsustainability of government’s provision given its limited budget and explore private sector options.
topic Contingent Valuation Method
WTP
Social capital
Trust
Electricity
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13705-017-0133-0
work_keys_str_mv AT anthonyamoah ingovwetrustthelesswepayforimprovedelectricitysupplyinghana
AT davisadularbi ingovwetrustthelesswepayforimprovedelectricitysupplyinghana
AT danieloffei ingovwetrustthelesswepayforimprovedelectricitysupplyinghana
AT anthonypanin ingovwetrustthelesswepayforimprovedelectricitysupplyinghana
_version_ 1725350519657988096