The Efficacy of Digital Case Scenario versus Paper Case Scenario on Clinical Reasoning in Problem Based Learning: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Introduction: In medical and clinical education, creating critical thinking and promoting clinical reasoning abilities are the highest aims and results of education. The main aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of digital case scenarios versus print/paper case scenarios on clinical reasonin...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Zarea Gavgani Vahideh, Hazrati Hakime, Ghojazadeh Mortaza
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Tabriz University of Medical Sciences 2015-07-01
Series:Research and Development in Medical Education
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journals.tbzmed.ac.ir/RDME/Manuscript/RDME-4-17.pdf
id doaj-f6923a26c7944f7cbbbfc14656bea046
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f6923a26c7944f7cbbbfc14656bea0462020-11-25T00:26:37ZengTabriz University of Medical SciencesResearch and Development in Medical Education2322-27192015-07-0141172210.15171/rdme.2015.003RDME_1182_20150126090847The Efficacy of Digital Case Scenario versus Paper Case Scenario on Clinical Reasoning in Problem Based Learning: A Systematic Review and Meta-AnalysisZarea Gavgani Vahideh0Hazrati Hakime1Ghojazadeh Mortaza2Health Services Management Research Center, National Public Health Management Center (NPMC), Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, IranMedical Education Research Center, Education Development Center (EDC), Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, IranLiver and Gastrointestinal Diseases Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, IranIntroduction: In medical and clinical education, creating critical thinking and promoting clinical reasoning abilities are the highest aims and results of education. The main aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of digital case scenarios versus print/paper case scenarios on clinical reasoning in problem-based learning (PBL). If a study used the multimedia scenario case interventions, video case scenarios and online-guided scenarios as digital case PBL, we would consider it eligible. Method:The study was a systematic review and meta-analysis. A comprehensive search for all randomized controlled trials, systematic reviews and meta-analyses for digital case scenarios versus paper case scenarios in PBL were conducted using Medline (Ovid), Scopus, ISI Web of Science and CINAHL. Google Scholar was used to follow the bibliographies of the related papers to create an exhaustive data set. Search results were limited to the years 2003-2013. Results: Our searches yielded 65 hits. After initial screenings of the titles and abstracts, we assessed the full texts of studies. Five eligible studies with 222 students were included in the meta-analysis. The meta-analysis showed that both of the digital and paper-based scenarios have similar impacts on clinical reasoning. But the review of papers showed that 73% of students are more satisfied with digital scenarios in comparison with paper-based scenarios and found that digital scenarios are 90% more time saving than paper-based scenarios. Conclusion: According to the results of meta-analysis, efficacy of digital-based scenarios is similar to the efficacy of paper-based scenarios while simultaneously creating more satisfaction and saving the time of students and teachers; therefore, it is suggested that electronic PBL be used rather than paper-based in all levels of medical education.http://journals.tbzmed.ac.ir/RDME/Manuscript/RDME-4-17.pdfDigital Case ScenarioPaper Case ScenarioProblem Based Learning
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Zarea Gavgani Vahideh
Hazrati Hakime
Ghojazadeh Mortaza
spellingShingle Zarea Gavgani Vahideh
Hazrati Hakime
Ghojazadeh Mortaza
The Efficacy of Digital Case Scenario versus Paper Case Scenario on Clinical Reasoning in Problem Based Learning: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Research and Development in Medical Education
Digital Case Scenario
Paper Case Scenario
Problem Based Learning
author_facet Zarea Gavgani Vahideh
Hazrati Hakime
Ghojazadeh Mortaza
author_sort Zarea Gavgani Vahideh
title The Efficacy of Digital Case Scenario versus Paper Case Scenario on Clinical Reasoning in Problem Based Learning: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_short The Efficacy of Digital Case Scenario versus Paper Case Scenario on Clinical Reasoning in Problem Based Learning: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full The Efficacy of Digital Case Scenario versus Paper Case Scenario on Clinical Reasoning in Problem Based Learning: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr The Efficacy of Digital Case Scenario versus Paper Case Scenario on Clinical Reasoning in Problem Based Learning: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed The Efficacy of Digital Case Scenario versus Paper Case Scenario on Clinical Reasoning in Problem Based Learning: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_sort the efficacy of digital case scenario versus paper case scenario on clinical reasoning in problem based learning: a systematic review and meta-analysis
publisher Tabriz University of Medical Sciences
series Research and Development in Medical Education
issn 2322-2719
publishDate 2015-07-01
description Introduction: In medical and clinical education, creating critical thinking and promoting clinical reasoning abilities are the highest aims and results of education. The main aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of digital case scenarios versus print/paper case scenarios on clinical reasoning in problem-based learning (PBL). If a study used the multimedia scenario case interventions, video case scenarios and online-guided scenarios as digital case PBL, we would consider it eligible. Method:The study was a systematic review and meta-analysis. A comprehensive search for all randomized controlled trials, systematic reviews and meta-analyses for digital case scenarios versus paper case scenarios in PBL were conducted using Medline (Ovid), Scopus, ISI Web of Science and CINAHL. Google Scholar was used to follow the bibliographies of the related papers to create an exhaustive data set. Search results were limited to the years 2003-2013. Results: Our searches yielded 65 hits. After initial screenings of the titles and abstracts, we assessed the full texts of studies. Five eligible studies with 222 students were included in the meta-analysis. The meta-analysis showed that both of the digital and paper-based scenarios have similar impacts on clinical reasoning. But the review of papers showed that 73% of students are more satisfied with digital scenarios in comparison with paper-based scenarios and found that digital scenarios are 90% more time saving than paper-based scenarios. Conclusion: According to the results of meta-analysis, efficacy of digital-based scenarios is similar to the efficacy of paper-based scenarios while simultaneously creating more satisfaction and saving the time of students and teachers; therefore, it is suggested that electronic PBL be used rather than paper-based in all levels of medical education.
topic Digital Case Scenario
Paper Case Scenario
Problem Based Learning
url http://journals.tbzmed.ac.ir/RDME/Manuscript/RDME-4-17.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT zareagavganivahideh theefficacyofdigitalcasescenarioversuspapercasescenarioonclinicalreasoninginproblembasedlearningasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT hazratihakime theefficacyofdigitalcasescenarioversuspapercasescenarioonclinicalreasoninginproblembasedlearningasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT ghojazadehmortaza theefficacyofdigitalcasescenarioversuspapercasescenarioonclinicalreasoninginproblembasedlearningasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
_version_ 1725343619202678784