TOWARDS PRONATALISM – BALTIC FAMILY POLICY IN EUROPEAN COMPARISON IN 2002 AND 2010

The majority of comparative analyses of family policy have been oriented towards western European countries and only very few have included Baltic and eastern European countries. The aim of this paper is to analyse family policy in Baltic countries in European comparison about ten years after regai...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mare Ainsaar, Helina Riisalu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Vilnius University Press 2015-01-01
Series:Baltic Journal of Political Science
Online Access:http://www4220.vu.lt/BJPS/article/view/4870
id doaj-f69177ef84e648e28b8ed7ef7768d4d7
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f69177ef84e648e28b8ed7ef7768d4d72020-11-25T02:11:36ZengVilnius University PressBaltic Journal of Political Science2335-23372424-54882015-01-01310.15388/BJPS.2014.3.4870TOWARDS PRONATALISM – BALTIC FAMILY POLICY IN EUROPEAN COMPARISON IN 2002 AND 2010Mare Ainsaar0Helina Riisalu1Institute of Social Studies, University of TartuUniversity of Tartu The majority of comparative analyses of family policy have been oriented towards western European countries and only very few have included Baltic and eastern European countries. The aim of this paper is to analyse family policy in Baltic countries in European comparison about ten years after regaining independence, in 2002, and in 2010. Family policy is divided into two categories for analysis: 1) support for families from around the birth of a child until the first birthday of the child, pronatalist policies; and 2) child well-being policies, support for the family when the child is older. All policy data are standardised according to the relative wealth in the particular country. Results demonstrate that after ten years of country specific family policy processes, Lithuania developed a very specific pronatalist family policy type compared with Estonia and Latvia. In 2010, Estonia and Latvia also obtained a more pronatalist approach, but the Baltic countries did not belong to any one particular crystallised family policy group. http://www4220.vu.lt/BJPS/article/view/4870
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Mare Ainsaar
Helina Riisalu
spellingShingle Mare Ainsaar
Helina Riisalu
TOWARDS PRONATALISM – BALTIC FAMILY POLICY IN EUROPEAN COMPARISON IN 2002 AND 2010
Baltic Journal of Political Science
author_facet Mare Ainsaar
Helina Riisalu
author_sort Mare Ainsaar
title TOWARDS PRONATALISM – BALTIC FAMILY POLICY IN EUROPEAN COMPARISON IN 2002 AND 2010
title_short TOWARDS PRONATALISM – BALTIC FAMILY POLICY IN EUROPEAN COMPARISON IN 2002 AND 2010
title_full TOWARDS PRONATALISM – BALTIC FAMILY POLICY IN EUROPEAN COMPARISON IN 2002 AND 2010
title_fullStr TOWARDS PRONATALISM – BALTIC FAMILY POLICY IN EUROPEAN COMPARISON IN 2002 AND 2010
title_full_unstemmed TOWARDS PRONATALISM – BALTIC FAMILY POLICY IN EUROPEAN COMPARISON IN 2002 AND 2010
title_sort towards pronatalism – baltic family policy in european comparison in 2002 and 2010
publisher Vilnius University Press
series Baltic Journal of Political Science
issn 2335-2337
2424-5488
publishDate 2015-01-01
description The majority of comparative analyses of family policy have been oriented towards western European countries and only very few have included Baltic and eastern European countries. The aim of this paper is to analyse family policy in Baltic countries in European comparison about ten years after regaining independence, in 2002, and in 2010. Family policy is divided into two categories for analysis: 1) support for families from around the birth of a child until the first birthday of the child, pronatalist policies; and 2) child well-being policies, support for the family when the child is older. All policy data are standardised according to the relative wealth in the particular country. Results demonstrate that after ten years of country specific family policy processes, Lithuania developed a very specific pronatalist family policy type compared with Estonia and Latvia. In 2010, Estonia and Latvia also obtained a more pronatalist approach, but the Baltic countries did not belong to any one particular crystallised family policy group.
url http://www4220.vu.lt/BJPS/article/view/4870
work_keys_str_mv AT mareainsaar towardspronatalismbalticfamilypolicyineuropeancomparisonin2002and2010
AT helinariisalu towardspronatalismbalticfamilypolicyineuropeancomparisonin2002and2010
_version_ 1724913923768975360