Can ‘Hebb’ Be Distracted? Testing the Susceptibility of Sequence Learning to Auditory Distraction
Sequence learning plays a key role in many daily activities such as language and skills acquisition. The present study sought to assess the nature of the Hebb repetition effect—the enhanced serial recall for a repeated sequence of items compared to random sequences—by examining the vulnerability of...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Ubiquity Press
2018-01-01
|
Series: | Journal of Cognition |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.journalofcognition.org/articles/8 |
id |
doaj-f6907b41acb642b68f982251ef1f75ca |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-f6907b41acb642b68f982251ef1f75ca2020-11-24T20:59:45ZengUbiquity PressJournal of Cognition2514-48202018-01-011110.5334/joc.87Can ‘Hebb’ Be Distracted? Testing the Susceptibility of Sequence Learning to Auditory DistractionFrançois Vachon0Alexandre Marois1Michaël Lévesque-Dion2Maxime Legendre3Jean Saint-Aubin4École de psychologie, Université Laval, Québec, CA; and Department of Building, Energy and Environmental Engineering, University of Gävle, GävleÉcole de psychologie, Université Laval, QuébecÉcole de psychologie, Université Laval, QuébecÉcole de psychologie, Université Laval, QuébecÉcole de psychologie, Université de Moncton, MonctonSequence learning plays a key role in many daily activities such as language and skills acquisition. The present study sought to assess the nature of the Hebb repetition effect—the enhanced serial recall for a repeated sequence of items compared to random sequences—by examining the vulnerability of this classical sequence-learning phenomenon to auditory distraction. Sound can cause unwanted distraction by either interfering specifically with the processes involved in the focal task (interference-by-process), or by diverting attention away from a focal task (attentional capture). Participants were asked to perform visual serial recall, in which one to-be-remembered sequence was repeated every four trials, while ignoring irrelevant sound. Whereas both changing-state (Experiment 1) and deviant sounds (Experiment 2) disrupted recall performance compared to steady-state sounds, performance for the repeated sequence increased across repetitions at the same rate regardless of the sound condition. Such findings suggest that Hebbian sequence learning is impervious to environmental interference, which provides further evidence that the Hebb repetition effect is an analogue of word-form learning.https://www.journalofcognition.org/articles/8Hebb repetition effectSequence learning, Auditory distractionSerial memoryIrrelevant SoundWord learning |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
François Vachon Alexandre Marois Michaël Lévesque-Dion Maxime Legendre Jean Saint-Aubin |
spellingShingle |
François Vachon Alexandre Marois Michaël Lévesque-Dion Maxime Legendre Jean Saint-Aubin Can ‘Hebb’ Be Distracted? Testing the Susceptibility of Sequence Learning to Auditory Distraction Journal of Cognition Hebb repetition effect Sequence learning, Auditory distraction Serial memory Irrelevant Sound Word learning |
author_facet |
François Vachon Alexandre Marois Michaël Lévesque-Dion Maxime Legendre Jean Saint-Aubin |
author_sort |
François Vachon |
title |
Can ‘Hebb’ Be Distracted? Testing the Susceptibility of Sequence Learning to Auditory Distraction |
title_short |
Can ‘Hebb’ Be Distracted? Testing the Susceptibility of Sequence Learning to Auditory Distraction |
title_full |
Can ‘Hebb’ Be Distracted? Testing the Susceptibility of Sequence Learning to Auditory Distraction |
title_fullStr |
Can ‘Hebb’ Be Distracted? Testing the Susceptibility of Sequence Learning to Auditory Distraction |
title_full_unstemmed |
Can ‘Hebb’ Be Distracted? Testing the Susceptibility of Sequence Learning to Auditory Distraction |
title_sort |
can ‘hebb’ be distracted? testing the susceptibility of sequence learning to auditory distraction |
publisher |
Ubiquity Press |
series |
Journal of Cognition |
issn |
2514-4820 |
publishDate |
2018-01-01 |
description |
Sequence learning plays a key role in many daily activities such as language and skills acquisition. The present study sought to assess the nature of the Hebb repetition effect—the enhanced serial recall for a repeated sequence of items compared to random sequences—by examining the vulnerability of this classical sequence-learning phenomenon to auditory distraction. Sound can cause unwanted distraction by either interfering specifically with the processes involved in the focal task (interference-by-process), or by diverting attention away from a focal task (attentional capture). Participants were asked to perform visual serial recall, in which one to-be-remembered sequence was repeated every four trials, while ignoring irrelevant sound. Whereas both changing-state (Experiment 1) and deviant sounds (Experiment 2) disrupted recall performance compared to steady-state sounds, performance for the repeated sequence increased across repetitions at the same rate regardless of the sound condition. Such findings suggest that Hebbian sequence learning is impervious to environmental interference, which provides further evidence that the Hebb repetition effect is an analogue of word-form learning. |
topic |
Hebb repetition effect Sequence learning, Auditory distraction Serial memory Irrelevant Sound Word learning |
url |
https://www.journalofcognition.org/articles/8 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT francoisvachon canhebbbedistractedtestingthesusceptibilityofsequencelearningtoauditorydistraction AT alexandremarois canhebbbedistractedtestingthesusceptibilityofsequencelearningtoauditorydistraction AT michaellevesquedion canhebbbedistractedtestingthesusceptibilityofsequencelearningtoauditorydistraction AT maximelegendre canhebbbedistractedtestingthesusceptibilityofsequencelearningtoauditorydistraction AT jeansaintaubin canhebbbedistractedtestingthesusceptibilityofsequencelearningtoauditorydistraction |
_version_ |
1716781659327561728 |