Malaria in Meghalaya: a systematic literature review and analysis of data from the National Vector-Borne Disease Control Programme
Abstract Background Meghalaya, one of eight states in the northeastern region of India, has been reported to carry a high malaria burden. However, malaria surveillance, epidemiology, and vector studies are sparse, and no reviews combining these topics with malaria prevention and control strategies h...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2018-11-01
|
Series: | Malaria Journal |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12936-018-2563-3 |
id |
doaj-f68d3312e53349ffaa03a7c49dcec9eb |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-f68d3312e53349ffaa03a7c49dcec9eb2020-11-25T02:35:54ZengBMCMalaria Journal1475-28752018-11-0117111310.1186/s12936-018-2563-3Malaria in Meghalaya: a systematic literature review and analysis of data from the National Vector-Borne Disease Control ProgrammeAnne Kessler0Anna Maria van Eijk1Limalemla Jamir2Catherine Walton3Jane M. Carlton4Sandra Albert5Center for Genomics and Systems Biology, Department of Biology, New York UniversityCenter for Genomics and Systems Biology, Department of Biology, New York UniversityIndian Institute of Public Health-ShillongUniversity of ManchesterCenter for Genomics and Systems Biology, Department of Biology, New York UniversityIndian Institute of Public Health-ShillongAbstract Background Meghalaya, one of eight states in the northeastern region of India, has been reported to carry a high malaria burden. However, malaria surveillance, epidemiology, and vector studies are sparse, and no reviews combining these topics with malaria prevention and control strategies have been published in recent years. Furthermore, no analysis of surveillance data has been published documenting the changes in epidemiology following the first distribution of long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) statewide in 2016. Methods A hybrid approach was used to describe the status of malaria in Meghalaya. First, a literature search was performed using the terms ‘malaria’ and ‘Meghalaya’. Second, data were obtained from the Meghalaya State Malaria Control Programme for 2006–2017 for analysis of trends. Data from 3 years 2015–2017 were analysed further by district and year to assess changes in malaria incidence and distribution following the introduction of LLINs. Results/conclusions Like malaria in mainland India, malaria in Meghalaya is complex, with both Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium vivax parasites in circulation, multiple Anopheles vector species, and reports of both unusual and severe malaria syndromes across all age groups. Integrated statewide malaria epidemiology, vector, and prevention and control data for Meghalaya are not readily available, and published studies are largely focused on a single topic or a single district or region of the state. Although malaria prevention and control approaches are available, (e.g. spraying, LLINs, personal repellents), their use and effectiveness is also not well characterized in the literature. Analysis of state malaria control programme data indicates that case incidence and related fatalities in Meghalaya have declined over the last decade. This could be attributed to changes in treatment guidelines and/or statewide distribution of effective prevention methods such as LLINs. Since the distribution of more than 900,000 LLINs in 2016, the malaria caseload has declined significantly in most Meghalaya districts, excluding the remote and geographically isolated South Garo Hills. Additionally, the proportion of adult malaria cases (15+ years of age versus children 0–14 years) in most districts was significantly greater following LLIN distribution, which likely reflects common lifestyle practices in these areas (e.g. adults working during night hours; small children in the households receiving priority for bed net protection). While reduction in malaria case incidence and related deaths is clear, the changes in malaria transmission and clinical manifestation have not been characterized. Routine epidemiology and vector surveillance combined with real-time data reporting are essential for the continued reduction and eventual elimination of malaria in Meghalaya.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12936-018-2563-3MalariaMeghalayaLLINsEpidemiologyAnophelesComplex malaria |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Anne Kessler Anna Maria van Eijk Limalemla Jamir Catherine Walton Jane M. Carlton Sandra Albert |
spellingShingle |
Anne Kessler Anna Maria van Eijk Limalemla Jamir Catherine Walton Jane M. Carlton Sandra Albert Malaria in Meghalaya: a systematic literature review and analysis of data from the National Vector-Borne Disease Control Programme Malaria Journal Malaria Meghalaya LLINs Epidemiology Anopheles Complex malaria |
author_facet |
Anne Kessler Anna Maria van Eijk Limalemla Jamir Catherine Walton Jane M. Carlton Sandra Albert |
author_sort |
Anne Kessler |
title |
Malaria in Meghalaya: a systematic literature review and analysis of data from the National Vector-Borne Disease Control Programme |
title_short |
Malaria in Meghalaya: a systematic literature review and analysis of data from the National Vector-Borne Disease Control Programme |
title_full |
Malaria in Meghalaya: a systematic literature review and analysis of data from the National Vector-Borne Disease Control Programme |
title_fullStr |
Malaria in Meghalaya: a systematic literature review and analysis of data from the National Vector-Borne Disease Control Programme |
title_full_unstemmed |
Malaria in Meghalaya: a systematic literature review and analysis of data from the National Vector-Borne Disease Control Programme |
title_sort |
malaria in meghalaya: a systematic literature review and analysis of data from the national vector-borne disease control programme |
publisher |
BMC |
series |
Malaria Journal |
issn |
1475-2875 |
publishDate |
2018-11-01 |
description |
Abstract Background Meghalaya, one of eight states in the northeastern region of India, has been reported to carry a high malaria burden. However, malaria surveillance, epidemiology, and vector studies are sparse, and no reviews combining these topics with malaria prevention and control strategies have been published in recent years. Furthermore, no analysis of surveillance data has been published documenting the changes in epidemiology following the first distribution of long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) statewide in 2016. Methods A hybrid approach was used to describe the status of malaria in Meghalaya. First, a literature search was performed using the terms ‘malaria’ and ‘Meghalaya’. Second, data were obtained from the Meghalaya State Malaria Control Programme for 2006–2017 for analysis of trends. Data from 3 years 2015–2017 were analysed further by district and year to assess changes in malaria incidence and distribution following the introduction of LLINs. Results/conclusions Like malaria in mainland India, malaria in Meghalaya is complex, with both Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium vivax parasites in circulation, multiple Anopheles vector species, and reports of both unusual and severe malaria syndromes across all age groups. Integrated statewide malaria epidemiology, vector, and prevention and control data for Meghalaya are not readily available, and published studies are largely focused on a single topic or a single district or region of the state. Although malaria prevention and control approaches are available, (e.g. spraying, LLINs, personal repellents), their use and effectiveness is also not well characterized in the literature. Analysis of state malaria control programme data indicates that case incidence and related fatalities in Meghalaya have declined over the last decade. This could be attributed to changes in treatment guidelines and/or statewide distribution of effective prevention methods such as LLINs. Since the distribution of more than 900,000 LLINs in 2016, the malaria caseload has declined significantly in most Meghalaya districts, excluding the remote and geographically isolated South Garo Hills. Additionally, the proportion of adult malaria cases (15+ years of age versus children 0–14 years) in most districts was significantly greater following LLIN distribution, which likely reflects common lifestyle practices in these areas (e.g. adults working during night hours; small children in the households receiving priority for bed net protection). While reduction in malaria case incidence and related deaths is clear, the changes in malaria transmission and clinical manifestation have not been characterized. Routine epidemiology and vector surveillance combined with real-time data reporting are essential for the continued reduction and eventual elimination of malaria in Meghalaya. |
topic |
Malaria Meghalaya LLINs Epidemiology Anopheles Complex malaria |
url |
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12936-018-2563-3 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT annekessler malariainmeghalayaasystematicliteraturereviewandanalysisofdatafromthenationalvectorbornediseasecontrolprogramme AT annamariavaneijk malariainmeghalayaasystematicliteraturereviewandanalysisofdatafromthenationalvectorbornediseasecontrolprogramme AT limalemlajamir malariainmeghalayaasystematicliteraturereviewandanalysisofdatafromthenationalvectorbornediseasecontrolprogramme AT catherinewalton malariainmeghalayaasystematicliteraturereviewandanalysisofdatafromthenationalvectorbornediseasecontrolprogramme AT janemcarlton malariainmeghalayaasystematicliteraturereviewandanalysisofdatafromthenationalvectorbornediseasecontrolprogramme AT sandraalbert malariainmeghalayaasystematicliteraturereviewandanalysisofdatafromthenationalvectorbornediseasecontrolprogramme |
_version_ |
1724802695480475648 |