The Capabilities and Limitations of Clinical Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Detecting Kidney Stones: A Retrospective Study

The purpose of this work was to investigate the performance of currently available magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for detecting kidney stones, compared to computed tomography (CT) results, and to determine the characteristics of successfully detected stones. Patients who had undergone both abdomin...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: El-Sayed H. Ibrahim, Joseph G. Cernigliaro, Mellena D. Bridges, Robert A. Pooley, William E. Haley
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2016-01-01
Series:International Journal of Biomedical Imaging
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/4935656
id doaj-f6854cfe317d48a187ce9fcea21eaf28
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f6854cfe317d48a187ce9fcea21eaf282020-11-25T00:42:27ZengHindawi LimitedInternational Journal of Biomedical Imaging1687-41881687-41962016-01-01201610.1155/2016/49356564935656The Capabilities and Limitations of Clinical Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Detecting Kidney Stones: A Retrospective StudyEl-Sayed H. Ibrahim0Joseph G. Cernigliaro1Mellena D. Bridges2Robert A. Pooley3William E. Haley4Mayo Clinic, 4500 San Pablo Rd, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USAMayo Clinic, 4500 San Pablo Rd, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USAMayo Clinic, 4500 San Pablo Rd, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USAMayo Clinic, 4500 San Pablo Rd, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USAMayo Clinic, 4500 San Pablo Rd, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USAThe purpose of this work was to investigate the performance of currently available magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for detecting kidney stones, compared to computed tomography (CT) results, and to determine the characteristics of successfully detected stones. Patients who had undergone both abdominal/pelvic CT and MRI exams within 30 days were studied. The images were reviewed by two expert radiologists blinded to the patients’ respective radiological diagnoses. The study consisted of four steps: (1) reviewing the MRI images and determining whether any kidney stone(s) are identified; (2) reviewing the corresponding CT images and confirming whether kidney stones are identified; (3) reviewing the MRI images a second time, armed with the information from the corresponding CT, noting whether any kidney stones are positively identified that were previously missed; (4) for all stones MRI-confirmed on previous steps, the radiologist experts being asked to answer whether in retrospect, with knowledge of size and location on corresponding CT, these stones would be affirmed as confidently identified on MRI or not. In this best-case scenario involving knowledge of stones and their locations on concurrent CT, radiologist experts detected 19% of kidney stones on MRI, with stone size being a major factor for stone identification.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/4935656
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author El-Sayed H. Ibrahim
Joseph G. Cernigliaro
Mellena D. Bridges
Robert A. Pooley
William E. Haley
spellingShingle El-Sayed H. Ibrahim
Joseph G. Cernigliaro
Mellena D. Bridges
Robert A. Pooley
William E. Haley
The Capabilities and Limitations of Clinical Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Detecting Kidney Stones: A Retrospective Study
International Journal of Biomedical Imaging
author_facet El-Sayed H. Ibrahim
Joseph G. Cernigliaro
Mellena D. Bridges
Robert A. Pooley
William E. Haley
author_sort El-Sayed H. Ibrahim
title The Capabilities and Limitations of Clinical Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Detecting Kidney Stones: A Retrospective Study
title_short The Capabilities and Limitations of Clinical Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Detecting Kidney Stones: A Retrospective Study
title_full The Capabilities and Limitations of Clinical Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Detecting Kidney Stones: A Retrospective Study
title_fullStr The Capabilities and Limitations of Clinical Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Detecting Kidney Stones: A Retrospective Study
title_full_unstemmed The Capabilities and Limitations of Clinical Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Detecting Kidney Stones: A Retrospective Study
title_sort capabilities and limitations of clinical magnetic resonance imaging for detecting kidney stones: a retrospective study
publisher Hindawi Limited
series International Journal of Biomedical Imaging
issn 1687-4188
1687-4196
publishDate 2016-01-01
description The purpose of this work was to investigate the performance of currently available magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for detecting kidney stones, compared to computed tomography (CT) results, and to determine the characteristics of successfully detected stones. Patients who had undergone both abdominal/pelvic CT and MRI exams within 30 days were studied. The images were reviewed by two expert radiologists blinded to the patients’ respective radiological diagnoses. The study consisted of four steps: (1) reviewing the MRI images and determining whether any kidney stone(s) are identified; (2) reviewing the corresponding CT images and confirming whether kidney stones are identified; (3) reviewing the MRI images a second time, armed with the information from the corresponding CT, noting whether any kidney stones are positively identified that were previously missed; (4) for all stones MRI-confirmed on previous steps, the radiologist experts being asked to answer whether in retrospect, with knowledge of size and location on corresponding CT, these stones would be affirmed as confidently identified on MRI or not. In this best-case scenario involving knowledge of stones and their locations on concurrent CT, radiologist experts detected 19% of kidney stones on MRI, with stone size being a major factor for stone identification.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/4935656
work_keys_str_mv AT elsayedhibrahim thecapabilitiesandlimitationsofclinicalmagneticresonanceimagingfordetectingkidneystonesaretrospectivestudy
AT josephgcernigliaro thecapabilitiesandlimitationsofclinicalmagneticresonanceimagingfordetectingkidneystonesaretrospectivestudy
AT mellenadbridges thecapabilitiesandlimitationsofclinicalmagneticresonanceimagingfordetectingkidneystonesaretrospectivestudy
AT robertapooley thecapabilitiesandlimitationsofclinicalmagneticresonanceimagingfordetectingkidneystonesaretrospectivestudy
AT williamehaley thecapabilitiesandlimitationsofclinicalmagneticresonanceimagingfordetectingkidneystonesaretrospectivestudy
AT elsayedhibrahim capabilitiesandlimitationsofclinicalmagneticresonanceimagingfordetectingkidneystonesaretrospectivestudy
AT josephgcernigliaro capabilitiesandlimitationsofclinicalmagneticresonanceimagingfordetectingkidneystonesaretrospectivestudy
AT mellenadbridges capabilitiesandlimitationsofclinicalmagneticresonanceimagingfordetectingkidneystonesaretrospectivestudy
AT robertapooley capabilitiesandlimitationsofclinicalmagneticresonanceimagingfordetectingkidneystonesaretrospectivestudy
AT williamehaley capabilitiesandlimitationsofclinicalmagneticresonanceimagingfordetectingkidneystonesaretrospectivestudy
_version_ 1725282474286645248