Developing a Theory in Academic Research: A Review of Experts’ Advice

Despite the number of developed theories, it still remains a difficult task for some established and emerging scholars in various academic fields to clearly articulate new theories from research studies. This paper reviews and collates the views of scholars on what a theory is and how a good theory...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Dankasa, Jacob
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information 2015-09-01
Series:Journal of Information Science Theory and Practice
Subjects:
Online Access:http://koix.kisti.re.kr/KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO201528765208440
id doaj-f67ef17d14e242f99fb09d9ca9d80c1b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f67ef17d14e242f99fb09d9ca9d80c1b2020-11-25T00:07:00ZengKorea Institute of Science and Technology InformationJournal of Information Science Theory and Practice2287-90992287-45772015-09-0133647410.1633/JISTaP.2015.3.3.422879099Developing a Theory in Academic Research: A Review of Experts’ AdviceDankasa, Jacob0University of North Texas Denton, USADespite the number of developed theories, it still remains a difficult task for some established and emerging scholars in various academic fields to clearly articulate new theories from research studies. This paper reviews and collates the views of scholars on what a theory is and how a good theory can be developed. It explains the concept of a theory, and the different components that make up a theory. The paper discusses the different processes of theory development by emphasizing what theory is and what theory is not. This review found that scholars differ in their definition of a theory, which leads to using terms such as model, paradigm, framework, and theory interchangeably. It found the lack of theoretical constructs in a study to be one of the factors which explains why articles are rejected for publication. This paper may be of benefit to established researchers who may be struggling with theory development, and especially younger academics who are the future of scholarship in various academic fields, particularly in information science.http://koix.kisti.re.kr/KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO201528765208440Theory DevelopmentInformation ScienceReviewDeveloping a Theory
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Dankasa, Jacob
spellingShingle Dankasa, Jacob
Developing a Theory in Academic Research: A Review of Experts’ Advice
Journal of Information Science Theory and Practice
Theory Development
Information Science
Review
Developing a Theory
author_facet Dankasa, Jacob
author_sort Dankasa, Jacob
title Developing a Theory in Academic Research: A Review of Experts’ Advice
title_short Developing a Theory in Academic Research: A Review of Experts’ Advice
title_full Developing a Theory in Academic Research: A Review of Experts’ Advice
title_fullStr Developing a Theory in Academic Research: A Review of Experts’ Advice
title_full_unstemmed Developing a Theory in Academic Research: A Review of Experts’ Advice
title_sort developing a theory in academic research: a review of experts’ advice
publisher Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information
series Journal of Information Science Theory and Practice
issn 2287-9099
2287-4577
publishDate 2015-09-01
description Despite the number of developed theories, it still remains a difficult task for some established and emerging scholars in various academic fields to clearly articulate new theories from research studies. This paper reviews and collates the views of scholars on what a theory is and how a good theory can be developed. It explains the concept of a theory, and the different components that make up a theory. The paper discusses the different processes of theory development by emphasizing what theory is and what theory is not. This review found that scholars differ in their definition of a theory, which leads to using terms such as model, paradigm, framework, and theory interchangeably. It found the lack of theoretical constructs in a study to be one of the factors which explains why articles are rejected for publication. This paper may be of benefit to established researchers who may be struggling with theory development, and especially younger academics who are the future of scholarship in various academic fields, particularly in information science.
topic Theory Development
Information Science
Review
Developing a Theory
url http://koix.kisti.re.kr/KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO201528765208440
work_keys_str_mv AT dankasajacob developingatheoryinacademicresearchareviewofexpertsx2019advice
_version_ 1725420433729126400