Social Pedagogy within Key Worker Practice: Community Situated Support for Marginalised Youth

This article explores social pedagogic practices that are embedded, but arguably unrecognised, within a variety of support worker roles. I will argue that the work done within intersubjective relationships formed with marginalised youth is best understood as social pedagogy and not, as support worke...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Shaun T. Morgan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: UCL Press 2013-01-01
Series:International Journal of Social Pedagogy
Online Access:https://ucl.scienceopen.com/hosted-document?doi=10.14324/111.444.ijsp.2013.v2.1.003
id doaj-f66feebf34194ac38d87d2ea09278953
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f66feebf34194ac38d87d2ea092789532020-12-15T17:28:14ZengUCL PressInternational Journal of Social Pedagogy2051-58042013-01-0110.14324/111.444.ijsp.2013.v2.1.003Social Pedagogy within Key Worker Practice: Community Situated Support for Marginalised YouthShaun T. MorganThis article explores social pedagogic practices that are embedded, but arguably unrecognised, within a variety of support worker roles. I will argue that the work done within intersubjective relationships formed with marginalised youth is best understood as social pedagogy and not, as support workers themselves typically insist, youth mentoring. Through the exploration of this relationship dynamic it becomes possible to ‘open-up’ objectivist professional roles to ‘make room’ for a mode of engagement that connects with marginalised youth at an intersubjective level. Support workers often establish this dialectical mode of engagement anyway, but lacking a structured discourse with which to articulate their pedagogic strategies, they fall back on the concept of mentoring as a best fit model. If this thesis is accepted, there are two significant implications. Firstly, an integration of social pedagogic concepts within this new practice space has the potential to improve outcomes for marginalised youth and, secondly, an exploration of the work done within similar relationship dynamics could potentially answer the question ‘what is social pedagogy?’. Beyond this, there is value in exploring the apparent nexus that exists between the fields of youth mentoring and social pedagogy, as much could be gained by elucidating their shared conceptual links.https://ucl.scienceopen.com/hosted-document?doi=10.14324/111.444.ijsp.2013.v2.1.003
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Shaun T. Morgan
spellingShingle Shaun T. Morgan
Social Pedagogy within Key Worker Practice: Community Situated Support for Marginalised Youth
International Journal of Social Pedagogy
author_facet Shaun T. Morgan
author_sort Shaun T. Morgan
title Social Pedagogy within Key Worker Practice: Community Situated Support for Marginalised Youth
title_short Social Pedagogy within Key Worker Practice: Community Situated Support for Marginalised Youth
title_full Social Pedagogy within Key Worker Practice: Community Situated Support for Marginalised Youth
title_fullStr Social Pedagogy within Key Worker Practice: Community Situated Support for Marginalised Youth
title_full_unstemmed Social Pedagogy within Key Worker Practice: Community Situated Support for Marginalised Youth
title_sort social pedagogy within key worker practice: community situated support for marginalised youth
publisher UCL Press
series International Journal of Social Pedagogy
issn 2051-5804
publishDate 2013-01-01
description This article explores social pedagogic practices that are embedded, but arguably unrecognised, within a variety of support worker roles. I will argue that the work done within intersubjective relationships formed with marginalised youth is best understood as social pedagogy and not, as support workers themselves typically insist, youth mentoring. Through the exploration of this relationship dynamic it becomes possible to ‘open-up’ objectivist professional roles to ‘make room’ for a mode of engagement that connects with marginalised youth at an intersubjective level. Support workers often establish this dialectical mode of engagement anyway, but lacking a structured discourse with which to articulate their pedagogic strategies, they fall back on the concept of mentoring as a best fit model. If this thesis is accepted, there are two significant implications. Firstly, an integration of social pedagogic concepts within this new practice space has the potential to improve outcomes for marginalised youth and, secondly, an exploration of the work done within similar relationship dynamics could potentially answer the question ‘what is social pedagogy?’. Beyond this, there is value in exploring the apparent nexus that exists between the fields of youth mentoring and social pedagogy, as much could be gained by elucidating their shared conceptual links.
url https://ucl.scienceopen.com/hosted-document?doi=10.14324/111.444.ijsp.2013.v2.1.003
work_keys_str_mv AT shauntmorgan socialpedagogywithinkeyworkerpracticecommunitysituatedsupportformarginalisedyouth
_version_ 1724382278991216640