Validation of the Chinese Non‐pharmacological Therapy Experience Scale in persons with intellectual disability
Abstract Aim To validate the 4‐ and 7‐point Chinese Non‐pharmacological Therapy Experience Scales and test the psychometric properties of the scales on persons with intellectual disability. Design A validation study. Methods Sixty‐seven persons with intellectual disability were recruited from six ho...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wiley
2020-01-01
|
Series: | Nursing Open |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.398 |
id |
doaj-f66edad7ee4549b29f9f7eb46df7ccac |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-f66edad7ee4549b29f9f7eb46df7ccac2020-11-25T01:17:08ZengWileyNursing Open2054-10582020-01-017139039710.1002/nop2.398Validation of the Chinese Non‐pharmacological Therapy Experience Scale in persons with intellectual disabilityLily Yuen Wah Ho0Kenny Chi Wing Chin1Connie Yuen Yee Fung2Claudia Kam Yuk Lai3School of Nursing The Hong Kong Polytechnic University Kowloon Hong KongStat Solutions Co Kowloon Hong KongHong Kong Association of Therapeutic Horticulture Tsuen Wan Hong KongSchool of Nursing The Hong Kong Polytechnic University Kowloon Hong KongAbstract Aim To validate the 4‐ and 7‐point Chinese Non‐pharmacological Therapy Experience Scales and test the psychometric properties of the scales on persons with intellectual disability. Design A validation study. Methods Sixty‐seven persons with intellectual disability were recruited from six hostels or centres for persons with intellectual disability in Hong Kong. A total of 1,163 and 1,161 observations were collected by the trained observers with the 4‐point and 7‐point scales, respectively. The floor and ceiling effects, inter‐rater reliability, internal consistency, responsiveness of both scales and the scale equivalence were examined. Results The Cronbach's α of the 4‐ and 7‐point scales was .762 and .797, respectively. The correlation between the two scales was 0.906. The inter‐rater reliability of the 4‐ and 7‐point scales was 0.774 and 0.835, respectively. Neither scale had the floor or ceiling effects. The effect size of the 7‐point scale was consistently higher than that of the 4‐point scale.https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.398horticultural therapyinstrument developmentinstrument responsivenessintellectual disabilityprocess evaluationreliability and validity |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Lily Yuen Wah Ho Kenny Chi Wing Chin Connie Yuen Yee Fung Claudia Kam Yuk Lai |
spellingShingle |
Lily Yuen Wah Ho Kenny Chi Wing Chin Connie Yuen Yee Fung Claudia Kam Yuk Lai Validation of the Chinese Non‐pharmacological Therapy Experience Scale in persons with intellectual disability Nursing Open horticultural therapy instrument development instrument responsiveness intellectual disability process evaluation reliability and validity |
author_facet |
Lily Yuen Wah Ho Kenny Chi Wing Chin Connie Yuen Yee Fung Claudia Kam Yuk Lai |
author_sort |
Lily Yuen Wah Ho |
title |
Validation of the Chinese Non‐pharmacological Therapy Experience Scale in persons with intellectual disability |
title_short |
Validation of the Chinese Non‐pharmacological Therapy Experience Scale in persons with intellectual disability |
title_full |
Validation of the Chinese Non‐pharmacological Therapy Experience Scale in persons with intellectual disability |
title_fullStr |
Validation of the Chinese Non‐pharmacological Therapy Experience Scale in persons with intellectual disability |
title_full_unstemmed |
Validation of the Chinese Non‐pharmacological Therapy Experience Scale in persons with intellectual disability |
title_sort |
validation of the chinese non‐pharmacological therapy experience scale in persons with intellectual disability |
publisher |
Wiley |
series |
Nursing Open |
issn |
2054-1058 |
publishDate |
2020-01-01 |
description |
Abstract Aim To validate the 4‐ and 7‐point Chinese Non‐pharmacological Therapy Experience Scales and test the psychometric properties of the scales on persons with intellectual disability. Design A validation study. Methods Sixty‐seven persons with intellectual disability were recruited from six hostels or centres for persons with intellectual disability in Hong Kong. A total of 1,163 and 1,161 observations were collected by the trained observers with the 4‐point and 7‐point scales, respectively. The floor and ceiling effects, inter‐rater reliability, internal consistency, responsiveness of both scales and the scale equivalence were examined. Results The Cronbach's α of the 4‐ and 7‐point scales was .762 and .797, respectively. The correlation between the two scales was 0.906. The inter‐rater reliability of the 4‐ and 7‐point scales was 0.774 and 0.835, respectively. Neither scale had the floor or ceiling effects. The effect size of the 7‐point scale was consistently higher than that of the 4‐point scale. |
topic |
horticultural therapy instrument development instrument responsiveness intellectual disability process evaluation reliability and validity |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.398 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT lilyyuenwahho validationofthechinesenonpharmacologicaltherapyexperiencescaleinpersonswithintellectualdisability AT kennychiwingchin validationofthechinesenonpharmacologicaltherapyexperiencescaleinpersonswithintellectualdisability AT connieyuenyeefung validationofthechinesenonpharmacologicaltherapyexperiencescaleinpersonswithintellectualdisability AT claudiakamyuklai validationofthechinesenonpharmacologicaltherapyexperiencescaleinpersonswithintellectualdisability |
_version_ |
1725147948048711680 |