Validation of the Chinese Non‐pharmacological Therapy Experience Scale in persons with intellectual disability

Abstract Aim To validate the 4‐ and 7‐point Chinese Non‐pharmacological Therapy Experience Scales and test the psychometric properties of the scales on persons with intellectual disability. Design A validation study. Methods Sixty‐seven persons with intellectual disability were recruited from six ho...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lily Yuen Wah Ho, Kenny Chi Wing Chin, Connie Yuen Yee Fung, Claudia Kam Yuk Lai
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2020-01-01
Series:Nursing Open
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.398
id doaj-f66edad7ee4549b29f9f7eb46df7ccac
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f66edad7ee4549b29f9f7eb46df7ccac2020-11-25T01:17:08ZengWileyNursing Open2054-10582020-01-017139039710.1002/nop2.398Validation of the Chinese Non‐pharmacological Therapy Experience Scale in persons with intellectual disabilityLily Yuen Wah Ho0Kenny Chi Wing Chin1Connie Yuen Yee Fung2Claudia Kam Yuk Lai3School of Nursing The Hong Kong Polytechnic University Kowloon Hong KongStat Solutions Co Kowloon Hong KongHong Kong Association of Therapeutic Horticulture Tsuen Wan Hong KongSchool of Nursing The Hong Kong Polytechnic University Kowloon Hong KongAbstract Aim To validate the 4‐ and 7‐point Chinese Non‐pharmacological Therapy Experience Scales and test the psychometric properties of the scales on persons with intellectual disability. Design A validation study. Methods Sixty‐seven persons with intellectual disability were recruited from six hostels or centres for persons with intellectual disability in Hong Kong. A total of 1,163 and 1,161 observations were collected by the trained observers with the 4‐point and 7‐point scales, respectively. The floor and ceiling effects, inter‐rater reliability, internal consistency, responsiveness of both scales and the scale equivalence were examined. Results The Cronbach's α of the 4‐ and 7‐point scales was .762 and .797, respectively. The correlation between the two scales was 0.906. The inter‐rater reliability of the 4‐ and 7‐point scales was 0.774 and 0.835, respectively. Neither scale had the floor or ceiling effects. The effect size of the 7‐point scale was consistently higher than that of the 4‐point scale.https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.398horticultural therapyinstrument developmentinstrument responsivenessintellectual disabilityprocess evaluationreliability and validity
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Lily Yuen Wah Ho
Kenny Chi Wing Chin
Connie Yuen Yee Fung
Claudia Kam Yuk Lai
spellingShingle Lily Yuen Wah Ho
Kenny Chi Wing Chin
Connie Yuen Yee Fung
Claudia Kam Yuk Lai
Validation of the Chinese Non‐pharmacological Therapy Experience Scale in persons with intellectual disability
Nursing Open
horticultural therapy
instrument development
instrument responsiveness
intellectual disability
process evaluation
reliability and validity
author_facet Lily Yuen Wah Ho
Kenny Chi Wing Chin
Connie Yuen Yee Fung
Claudia Kam Yuk Lai
author_sort Lily Yuen Wah Ho
title Validation of the Chinese Non‐pharmacological Therapy Experience Scale in persons with intellectual disability
title_short Validation of the Chinese Non‐pharmacological Therapy Experience Scale in persons with intellectual disability
title_full Validation of the Chinese Non‐pharmacological Therapy Experience Scale in persons with intellectual disability
title_fullStr Validation of the Chinese Non‐pharmacological Therapy Experience Scale in persons with intellectual disability
title_full_unstemmed Validation of the Chinese Non‐pharmacological Therapy Experience Scale in persons with intellectual disability
title_sort validation of the chinese non‐pharmacological therapy experience scale in persons with intellectual disability
publisher Wiley
series Nursing Open
issn 2054-1058
publishDate 2020-01-01
description Abstract Aim To validate the 4‐ and 7‐point Chinese Non‐pharmacological Therapy Experience Scales and test the psychometric properties of the scales on persons with intellectual disability. Design A validation study. Methods Sixty‐seven persons with intellectual disability were recruited from six hostels or centres for persons with intellectual disability in Hong Kong. A total of 1,163 and 1,161 observations were collected by the trained observers with the 4‐point and 7‐point scales, respectively. The floor and ceiling effects, inter‐rater reliability, internal consistency, responsiveness of both scales and the scale equivalence were examined. Results The Cronbach's α of the 4‐ and 7‐point scales was .762 and .797, respectively. The correlation between the two scales was 0.906. The inter‐rater reliability of the 4‐ and 7‐point scales was 0.774 and 0.835, respectively. Neither scale had the floor or ceiling effects. The effect size of the 7‐point scale was consistently higher than that of the 4‐point scale.
topic horticultural therapy
instrument development
instrument responsiveness
intellectual disability
process evaluation
reliability and validity
url https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.398
work_keys_str_mv AT lilyyuenwahho validationofthechinesenonpharmacologicaltherapyexperiencescaleinpersonswithintellectualdisability
AT kennychiwingchin validationofthechinesenonpharmacologicaltherapyexperiencescaleinpersonswithintellectualdisability
AT connieyuenyeefung validationofthechinesenonpharmacologicaltherapyexperiencescaleinpersonswithintellectualdisability
AT claudiakamyuklai validationofthechinesenonpharmacologicaltherapyexperiencescaleinpersonswithintellectualdisability
_version_ 1725147948048711680