Comment on “Bioactive glass S53P4 vs. autologous bone graft for filling defects in patients with chronic osteomyelitis and infected non-unions – a single center experience” by Steinhausen et al. (2021)
Main Author: | M. McNally |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Copernicus Publications
2021-05-01
|
Series: | Journal of Bone and Joint Infection |
Online Access: | https://jbji.copernicus.org/articles/6/199/2021/jbji-6-199-2021.pdf |
Similar Items
-
Reply to McNally's comment on “Bioactive glass S53P4 vs. autologous bone graft for filling defects in patients with chronic osteomyelitis and infected non-unions – a single center experience” by Steinhausen et al. (2021)
by: E. Steinhausen, et al.
Published: (2021-05-01) -
Bioactive glass S53P4 vs. autologous bone graft for filling defects in patients with chronic osteomyelitis and infected non-unions – a single center experience
by: E. Steinhausen, et al.
Published: (2021-01-01) -
Treatment of Cavitary Bone Defects in Chronic Osteomyelitis: Bioactive glass S53P4 vs. Calcium Sulphate Antibiotic Beads
by: A. Ferrando, et al.
Published: (2017-10-01) -
Influence of bioactive glass S53P4 granules and putty on osteomyelitis associated bacteria in vitro
by: Stoor Patricia, et al.
Published: (2017-11-01) -
Cost-Effectiveness Study of One-Stage Treatment of Chronic Osteomyelitis with Bioactive Glass S53P4
by: Jan Geurts, et al.
Published: (2019-09-01)