Comparison of the Cross-calibration Methods between Image-based and RTM-BRDF for GF-1 Images

Four wide-field-of-view (WFV) instruments are on board the Gaofen-1 (or GF-1) satellite, providing a combined swath of ~800 km. Before appling to quantitative remote sensing, precision radiometric calibration is needed. Currently, there are two cross-calibration methods. One is the traditional cross...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: LI Juan, FENG Lian, PANG Xiaoping
Format: Article
Language:zho
Published: Surveying and Mapping Press 2017-07-01
Series:Acta Geodaetica et Cartographica Sinica
Subjects:
Online Access:http://html.rhhz.net/CHXB/html/2017-7-882.htm
id doaj-f669f070ef2b436f98578fc9ab17034f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f669f070ef2b436f98578fc9ab17034f2020-11-24T22:25:30ZzhoSurveying and Mapping PressActa Geodaetica et Cartographica Sinica1001-15951001-15952017-07-0146788289010.11947/j.AGCS.2017.2016031520170720160315Comparison of the Cross-calibration Methods between Image-based and RTM-BRDF for GF-1 ImagesLI Juan0FENG Lian1PANG Xiaoping2Chinese Antarctic Center of Surveying and Mapping, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430079, ChinaState Key Laboratory of Information Engineering in Surveying, Mapping and Remote Sensing, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430079, ChinaChinese Antarctic Center of Surveying and Mapping, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430079, ChinaFour wide-field-of-view (WFV) instruments are on board the Gaofen-1 (or GF-1) satellite, providing a combined swath of ~800 km. Before appling to quantitative remote sensing, precision radiometric calibration is needed. Currently, there are two cross-calibration methods. One is the traditional cross-calibration method (image-based), the other is based on radiative transfer model and bidirectional reflectance distribution function(RTM-BRDF). In this study, the two methods were used to cross-calibrate the WFVs of GF-1, and the comparisons were made at the same time. The verification based on satellite data and in situ measurements have shown that, for the two approximately nadir imaging camera WFV2 and WFV3, Image-based method could get higher precision radiometric calibration coefficients, while for two non-nadir imaging cameras WFV1 and WFV4, high precision calibration coefficients would be obtained by the RTM-BRDF method. Finally, the calibration coefficients of GF-1 was derived by the combination of the two methods.http://html.rhhz.net/CHXB/html/2017-7-882.htmGaofen-1 satellitecross-calibrationrelative spectral responseUSGS spectral libraryaerosolradiative transfer modelBRDF
collection DOAJ
language zho
format Article
sources DOAJ
author LI Juan
FENG Lian
PANG Xiaoping
spellingShingle LI Juan
FENG Lian
PANG Xiaoping
Comparison of the Cross-calibration Methods between Image-based and RTM-BRDF for GF-1 Images
Acta Geodaetica et Cartographica Sinica
Gaofen-1 satellite
cross-calibration
relative spectral response
USGS spectral library
aerosol
radiative transfer model
BRDF
author_facet LI Juan
FENG Lian
PANG Xiaoping
author_sort LI Juan
title Comparison of the Cross-calibration Methods between Image-based and RTM-BRDF for GF-1 Images
title_short Comparison of the Cross-calibration Methods between Image-based and RTM-BRDF for GF-1 Images
title_full Comparison of the Cross-calibration Methods between Image-based and RTM-BRDF for GF-1 Images
title_fullStr Comparison of the Cross-calibration Methods between Image-based and RTM-BRDF for GF-1 Images
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the Cross-calibration Methods between Image-based and RTM-BRDF for GF-1 Images
title_sort comparison of the cross-calibration methods between image-based and rtm-brdf for gf-1 images
publisher Surveying and Mapping Press
series Acta Geodaetica et Cartographica Sinica
issn 1001-1595
1001-1595
publishDate 2017-07-01
description Four wide-field-of-view (WFV) instruments are on board the Gaofen-1 (or GF-1) satellite, providing a combined swath of ~800 km. Before appling to quantitative remote sensing, precision radiometric calibration is needed. Currently, there are two cross-calibration methods. One is the traditional cross-calibration method (image-based), the other is based on radiative transfer model and bidirectional reflectance distribution function(RTM-BRDF). In this study, the two methods were used to cross-calibrate the WFVs of GF-1, and the comparisons were made at the same time. The verification based on satellite data and in situ measurements have shown that, for the two approximately nadir imaging camera WFV2 and WFV3, Image-based method could get higher precision radiometric calibration coefficients, while for two non-nadir imaging cameras WFV1 and WFV4, high precision calibration coefficients would be obtained by the RTM-BRDF method. Finally, the calibration coefficients of GF-1 was derived by the combination of the two methods.
topic Gaofen-1 satellite
cross-calibration
relative spectral response
USGS spectral library
aerosol
radiative transfer model
BRDF
url http://html.rhhz.net/CHXB/html/2017-7-882.htm
work_keys_str_mv AT lijuan comparisonofthecrosscalibrationmethodsbetweenimagebasedandrtmbrdfforgf1images
AT fenglian comparisonofthecrosscalibrationmethodsbetweenimagebasedandrtmbrdfforgf1images
AT pangxiaoping comparisonofthecrosscalibrationmethodsbetweenimagebasedandrtmbrdfforgf1images
_version_ 1725757324422807552