Electrochemotherapy and basal cell carcinomas: First-time appraisal of the efficacy of electrochemotherapy on survivorship using FACE-Q

Summary: Introduction: The establishment and success of new treatments are significantly influenced by patient satisfaction. Post-operative scarring is an important outcome for patients, and subsequently influences overall satisfaction with treatment. The objective was to measure post-treatment sca...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Phoebe Lyons, Alison Kennedy, A.James P. Clover
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2021-03-01
Series:JPRAS Open
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352587820300723
id doaj-f65006b70be849a285af555d4954d3e7
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f65006b70be849a285af555d4954d3e72021-02-19T04:23:04ZengElsevierJPRAS Open2352-58782021-03-0127119128Electrochemotherapy and basal cell carcinomas: First-time appraisal of the efficacy of electrochemotherapy on survivorship using FACE-QPhoebe Lyons0Alison Kennedy1A.James P. Clover2Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Cork University Hospital, Cork, Ireland; Corresponding author at: Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Cork University Hospital, Cork, Ireland.Cancer Research @ UCC, Western Gateway Building, University College Cork, IrelandDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Cork University Hospital, Cork, Ireland; Cancer Research @ UCC, Western Gateway Building, University College Cork, IrelandSummary: Introduction: The establishment and success of new treatments are significantly influenced by patient satisfaction. Post-operative scarring is an important outcome for patients, and subsequently influences overall satisfaction with treatment. The objective was to measure post-treatment scarring satisfaction using a novel scale, the FACE-Q Skin Cancer Module, to compare electrochemotherapy (ECT) to traditional surgical excision (SE) to demonstrate equivalence of ECT and SE regarding outcome and survivorship. Methods and materials: This was a multicentre first-time appraisal study of the efficacy of ECT. All patients with facial BCCs treated with either ECT or SE were deemed eligible and subsequently recruited from either a previous clinical trial or outpatient clinics, respectively. Of the 40 participants invited, 25 responses were received. Patient information recorded included age, gender, location and size of BCCs, and time since treatment. Patient outcomes were measured using the FACE-Q Skin Cancer Module. Results: The ECT and SE groups consisted of 14 and 11 patients, respectively. Mean age was 68 years (M:F = 16:9), while mean time since treatment was 4.98 years (range 0.3–9.58 years). Appraisal of scars was significantly higher in the ECT cohort versus SE (p = 0.034). Cancer worry was equivalent across both cohorts (p = 0.804). According to treatment type, no correlation was detected between time since treatment and both appraisal of scars (ECT p = 0.466 and SE p = 0.214) and adverse effects (ECT p = 0.924 and SE p = 0.139). Conclusion: Based on this study, ECT has superior scar outcomes and overall equivalence to SE. This demonstrates high patient satisfaction for those treated with ECT without any additional cancer worry.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352587820300723ElectrochemotherapyBasal cell carcinomaFACE-QSurvivorship
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Phoebe Lyons
Alison Kennedy
A.James P. Clover
spellingShingle Phoebe Lyons
Alison Kennedy
A.James P. Clover
Electrochemotherapy and basal cell carcinomas: First-time appraisal of the efficacy of electrochemotherapy on survivorship using FACE-Q
JPRAS Open
Electrochemotherapy
Basal cell carcinoma
FACE-Q
Survivorship
author_facet Phoebe Lyons
Alison Kennedy
A.James P. Clover
author_sort Phoebe Lyons
title Electrochemotherapy and basal cell carcinomas: First-time appraisal of the efficacy of electrochemotherapy on survivorship using FACE-Q
title_short Electrochemotherapy and basal cell carcinomas: First-time appraisal of the efficacy of electrochemotherapy on survivorship using FACE-Q
title_full Electrochemotherapy and basal cell carcinomas: First-time appraisal of the efficacy of electrochemotherapy on survivorship using FACE-Q
title_fullStr Electrochemotherapy and basal cell carcinomas: First-time appraisal of the efficacy of electrochemotherapy on survivorship using FACE-Q
title_full_unstemmed Electrochemotherapy and basal cell carcinomas: First-time appraisal of the efficacy of electrochemotherapy on survivorship using FACE-Q
title_sort electrochemotherapy and basal cell carcinomas: first-time appraisal of the efficacy of electrochemotherapy on survivorship using face-q
publisher Elsevier
series JPRAS Open
issn 2352-5878
publishDate 2021-03-01
description Summary: Introduction: The establishment and success of new treatments are significantly influenced by patient satisfaction. Post-operative scarring is an important outcome for patients, and subsequently influences overall satisfaction with treatment. The objective was to measure post-treatment scarring satisfaction using a novel scale, the FACE-Q Skin Cancer Module, to compare electrochemotherapy (ECT) to traditional surgical excision (SE) to demonstrate equivalence of ECT and SE regarding outcome and survivorship. Methods and materials: This was a multicentre first-time appraisal study of the efficacy of ECT. All patients with facial BCCs treated with either ECT or SE were deemed eligible and subsequently recruited from either a previous clinical trial or outpatient clinics, respectively. Of the 40 participants invited, 25 responses were received. Patient information recorded included age, gender, location and size of BCCs, and time since treatment. Patient outcomes were measured using the FACE-Q Skin Cancer Module. Results: The ECT and SE groups consisted of 14 and 11 patients, respectively. Mean age was 68 years (M:F = 16:9), while mean time since treatment was 4.98 years (range 0.3–9.58 years). Appraisal of scars was significantly higher in the ECT cohort versus SE (p = 0.034). Cancer worry was equivalent across both cohorts (p = 0.804). According to treatment type, no correlation was detected between time since treatment and both appraisal of scars (ECT p = 0.466 and SE p = 0.214) and adverse effects (ECT p = 0.924 and SE p = 0.139). Conclusion: Based on this study, ECT has superior scar outcomes and overall equivalence to SE. This demonstrates high patient satisfaction for those treated with ECT without any additional cancer worry.
topic Electrochemotherapy
Basal cell carcinoma
FACE-Q
Survivorship
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352587820300723
work_keys_str_mv AT phoebelyons electrochemotherapyandbasalcellcarcinomasfirsttimeappraisaloftheefficacyofelectrochemotherapyonsurvivorshipusingfaceq
AT alisonkennedy electrochemotherapyandbasalcellcarcinomasfirsttimeappraisaloftheefficacyofelectrochemotherapyonsurvivorshipusingfaceq
AT ajamespclover electrochemotherapyandbasalcellcarcinomasfirsttimeappraisaloftheefficacyofelectrochemotherapyonsurvivorshipusingfaceq
_version_ 1724261805096697856