«Piecemeal, incremental, ad hoc»: ‘Beccarian’ experiments in law enforcement in late seventeenth- and early eighteenth-century England

In the course of the late seventeenth and early eighteenth century a series of measures were introduced into the practice of law enforcement in England which, though «piecemeal, incremental, ad hoc» were, J.M. Beattie claims, driven by a common belief in the need for more effective ways of dealing...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Jeanne Clegg
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Firenze University Press 2019-05-01
Series:Diciottesimo Secolo
Online Access:https://oajournals.fupress.net/index.php/ds/article/view/356
id doaj-f6457bc5a6ba47fe8e615c10a336b8cf
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f6457bc5a6ba47fe8e615c10a336b8cf2020-11-25T03:10:52ZengFirenze University PressDiciottesimo Secolo2531-41652019-05-01410.13128/ds-25441«Piecemeal, incremental, ad hoc»: ‘Beccarian’ experiments in law enforcement in late seventeenth- and early eighteenth-century EnglandJeanne Clegg0Università Ca’ Foscari di Venezia In the course of the late seventeenth and early eighteenth century a series of measures were introduced into the practice of law enforcement in England which, though «piecemeal, incremental, ad hoc» were, J.M. Beattie claims, driven by a common belief in the need for more effective ways of dealing with a perceived dramatic rise in urban property crime...These included preventative measures such as improvements in street lighting and gradual recognition of the need for professional policing, measures – such as statutory rewards to informers – designed to encourage prosecutions and raise conviction rates, and state-funded transportation, which provided a punishment more appropriate to petty crime than the death penalty. Though many of these measures, diverged sharply from Beccarian principles, Beattie is right in claiming that in general terms they «anticipated some of the arguments that would be made by the reformers of the late 18th century». If this has not been noticed previously it is because scholars have focused on the history of ideas at the expense of changes in practice the resulting from thousands of individual decisions by made by ordinary people, and even by apparently powerless. https://oajournals.fupress.net/index.php/ds/article/view/356
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jeanne Clegg
spellingShingle Jeanne Clegg
«Piecemeal, incremental, ad hoc»: ‘Beccarian’ experiments in law enforcement in late seventeenth- and early eighteenth-century England
Diciottesimo Secolo
author_facet Jeanne Clegg
author_sort Jeanne Clegg
title «Piecemeal, incremental, ad hoc»: ‘Beccarian’ experiments in law enforcement in late seventeenth- and early eighteenth-century England
title_short «Piecemeal, incremental, ad hoc»: ‘Beccarian’ experiments in law enforcement in late seventeenth- and early eighteenth-century England
title_full «Piecemeal, incremental, ad hoc»: ‘Beccarian’ experiments in law enforcement in late seventeenth- and early eighteenth-century England
title_fullStr «Piecemeal, incremental, ad hoc»: ‘Beccarian’ experiments in law enforcement in late seventeenth- and early eighteenth-century England
title_full_unstemmed «Piecemeal, incremental, ad hoc»: ‘Beccarian’ experiments in law enforcement in late seventeenth- and early eighteenth-century England
title_sort «piecemeal, incremental, ad hoc»: ‘beccarian’ experiments in law enforcement in late seventeenth- and early eighteenth-century england
publisher Firenze University Press
series Diciottesimo Secolo
issn 2531-4165
publishDate 2019-05-01
description In the course of the late seventeenth and early eighteenth century a series of measures were introduced into the practice of law enforcement in England which, though «piecemeal, incremental, ad hoc» were, J.M. Beattie claims, driven by a common belief in the need for more effective ways of dealing with a perceived dramatic rise in urban property crime...These included preventative measures such as improvements in street lighting and gradual recognition of the need for professional policing, measures – such as statutory rewards to informers – designed to encourage prosecutions and raise conviction rates, and state-funded transportation, which provided a punishment more appropriate to petty crime than the death penalty. Though many of these measures, diverged sharply from Beccarian principles, Beattie is right in claiming that in general terms they «anticipated some of the arguments that would be made by the reformers of the late 18th century». If this has not been noticed previously it is because scholars have focused on the history of ideas at the expense of changes in practice the resulting from thousands of individual decisions by made by ordinary people, and even by apparently powerless.
url https://oajournals.fupress.net/index.php/ds/article/view/356
work_keys_str_mv AT jeanneclegg piecemealincrementaladhocbeccarianexperimentsinlawenforcementinlateseventeenthandearlyeighteenthcenturyengland
_version_ 1724656868366745600