‘”Gaur as “Monument”: The Making of an Archive and Tropes of Memorializing’

This paper seeks to locate the fifteenth-century medieval city of ‘Gaur’ in Bengal, and the various historical and art historical claims which have emerged around it. Beginning with a historiography of early exploration and visual encounters with the site, this paper traces the aesthetic shifts and...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Parjanya Sen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Department of Art History, University of Birmingham 2013-12-01
Series:Journal of Art Historiography
Subjects:
ASI
Online Access:http://arthistoriography.files.wordpress.com/2013/12/sen.pdf
id doaj-f643cdef2d1c44d6874a01b3ca44ca8a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f643cdef2d1c44d6874a01b3ca44ca8a2020-11-24T22:45:14ZengDepartment of Art History, University of BirminghamJournal of Art Historiography2042-47522013-12-0199PS1‘”Gaur as “Monument”: The Making of an Archive and Tropes of Memorializing’Parjanya SenThis paper seeks to locate the fifteenth-century medieval city of ‘Gaur’ in Bengal, and the various historical and art historical claims which have emerged around it. Beginning with a historiography of early exploration and visual encounters with the site, this paper traces the aesthetic shifts and mediations which occurred during the Cunningham era in British India, which variously attempted to re-produce the colony’s ruins as knowable landscape. Within a larger set of historical/archaeological concerns which were intricately linked with the colonial project and desire to invest the colony with a history, what specificity did Gaur as site attain? The next section of this paper looks at a series of ‘native’ claims on the site and how the discipline of colonial archaeology itself created a variety of subject positions. The emergence of the ‘native’ scholar was both legitimized and co-opted by colonial pedagogy, as is witnessed in the case of Abid Ali. It also led to a series of counter claims which sought to incorporate Gaur as part of a nationalist and regional history.http://arthistoriography.files.wordpress.com/2013/12/sen.pdfbrick architectureBengalGaurPicturesquethe DaniellsmonumentalityASIAbid Ali
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Parjanya Sen
spellingShingle Parjanya Sen
‘”Gaur as “Monument”: The Making of an Archive and Tropes of Memorializing’
Journal of Art Historiography
brick architecture
Bengal
Gaur
Picturesque
the Daniells
monumentality
ASI
Abid Ali
author_facet Parjanya Sen
author_sort Parjanya Sen
title ‘”Gaur as “Monument”: The Making of an Archive and Tropes of Memorializing’
title_short ‘”Gaur as “Monument”: The Making of an Archive and Tropes of Memorializing’
title_full ‘”Gaur as “Monument”: The Making of an Archive and Tropes of Memorializing’
title_fullStr ‘”Gaur as “Monument”: The Making of an Archive and Tropes of Memorializing’
title_full_unstemmed ‘”Gaur as “Monument”: The Making of an Archive and Tropes of Memorializing’
title_sort ‘”gaur as “monument”: the making of an archive and tropes of memorializing’
publisher Department of Art History, University of Birmingham
series Journal of Art Historiography
issn 2042-4752
publishDate 2013-12-01
description This paper seeks to locate the fifteenth-century medieval city of ‘Gaur’ in Bengal, and the various historical and art historical claims which have emerged around it. Beginning with a historiography of early exploration and visual encounters with the site, this paper traces the aesthetic shifts and mediations which occurred during the Cunningham era in British India, which variously attempted to re-produce the colony’s ruins as knowable landscape. Within a larger set of historical/archaeological concerns which were intricately linked with the colonial project and desire to invest the colony with a history, what specificity did Gaur as site attain? The next section of this paper looks at a series of ‘native’ claims on the site and how the discipline of colonial archaeology itself created a variety of subject positions. The emergence of the ‘native’ scholar was both legitimized and co-opted by colonial pedagogy, as is witnessed in the case of Abid Ali. It also led to a series of counter claims which sought to incorporate Gaur as part of a nationalist and regional history.
topic brick architecture
Bengal
Gaur
Picturesque
the Daniells
monumentality
ASI
Abid Ali
url http://arthistoriography.files.wordpress.com/2013/12/sen.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT parjanyasen gaurasmonumentthemakingofanarchiveandtropesofmemorializing
_version_ 1725689487192752128