Cost-effectiveness of linezolid versus vancomycin in mechanical ventilation-associated nosocomial pneumonia caused by methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus

Linezolid, an oxazolidinone-class antimicrobial agent, is a new drug; its use has frequently been questioned due to its high price. However, recent trials have demonstrated that the use of linezolid in mechanical ventilation-associated nosocomial pneumonia caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococ...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Adão R. L. Machado, Clovis da Cunha Arns, Wilson Follador, Aline Guerra
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier
Series:Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-86702005000300001&lng=en&tlng=en
id doaj-f63b516cf2984dc59339db9b74212b98
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f63b516cf2984dc59339db9b74212b982020-11-25T03:48:42ZengElsevierBrazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases1678-43919319120010.1590/S1413-86702005000300001S1413-86702005000300001Cost-effectiveness of linezolid versus vancomycin in mechanical ventilation-associated nosocomial pneumonia caused by methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureusAdão R. L. Machado0Clovis da Cunha Arns1Wilson Follador2Aline Guerra3Institute of Hospital Administration and Health Sciences of Rio Grande do SulInstitute of Hospital Administration and Health Sciences of Rio Grande do SulInstitute of Hospital Administration and Health Sciences of Rio Grande do SulInstitute of Hospital Administration and Health Sciences of Rio Grande do SulLinezolid, an oxazolidinone-class antimicrobial agent, is a new drug; its use has frequently been questioned due to its high price. However, recent trials have demonstrated that the use of linezolid in mechanical ventilation-associated nosocomial pneumonia caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (VAP-MRSA) may be justified due to its improved efficacy compared to vancomycin. Price and cost have different magnitudes, and clinical efficacy should always be considered in the decision-making process. Our objective was to determine whether linezolid treatment was more cost-effective than vancomycin for treating VAP-MRSA. METHODOLOGY: Elaboration of an economic model from a metanalysis of previous clinical trials comparing both drugs, through a cost-effectiveness analysis. Costs of the treatments were calculated using Brazilian parameters and were compared to the results obtained in the metanalysis. In order to compare the results with real life conditions, costs were calculated for both name brand and for generic vancomycin. RESULTS: The cost (May/2004) per unit (vial, ampoule or bag) was R$ 47.73 for the name-brand vancomycin, R$ 14.45 for generic vancomycin and R$ 214.04 for linezolid. Linezolid's efficacy in VAP-MRSA according to the metanalysis was 62.2% and vancomycin's efficacy was 21.2%. The total cost per cured patient was R$ 13,231.65 for the name-brand vancomycin, R$ 11,277.59 for generic vancomycin and R$ 7,764.72 for linezolid. CONCLUSION: Despite the higher price per unit, linezolid was more cost-effective than vancomycin.http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-86702005000300001&lng=en&tlng=enLinezolidvancomycinStaphylococcus aureuspneumoniaventilatorcostpharmacoeconomic
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Adão R. L. Machado
Clovis da Cunha Arns
Wilson Follador
Aline Guerra
spellingShingle Adão R. L. Machado
Clovis da Cunha Arns
Wilson Follador
Aline Guerra
Cost-effectiveness of linezolid versus vancomycin in mechanical ventilation-associated nosocomial pneumonia caused by methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus
Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases
Linezolid
vancomycin
Staphylococcus aureus
pneumonia
ventilator
cost
pharmacoeconomic
author_facet Adão R. L. Machado
Clovis da Cunha Arns
Wilson Follador
Aline Guerra
author_sort Adão R. L. Machado
title Cost-effectiveness of linezolid versus vancomycin in mechanical ventilation-associated nosocomial pneumonia caused by methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus
title_short Cost-effectiveness of linezolid versus vancomycin in mechanical ventilation-associated nosocomial pneumonia caused by methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus
title_full Cost-effectiveness of linezolid versus vancomycin in mechanical ventilation-associated nosocomial pneumonia caused by methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus
title_fullStr Cost-effectiveness of linezolid versus vancomycin in mechanical ventilation-associated nosocomial pneumonia caused by methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus
title_full_unstemmed Cost-effectiveness of linezolid versus vancomycin in mechanical ventilation-associated nosocomial pneumonia caused by methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus
title_sort cost-effectiveness of linezolid versus vancomycin in mechanical ventilation-associated nosocomial pneumonia caused by methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus
publisher Elsevier
series Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases
issn 1678-4391
description Linezolid, an oxazolidinone-class antimicrobial agent, is a new drug; its use has frequently been questioned due to its high price. However, recent trials have demonstrated that the use of linezolid in mechanical ventilation-associated nosocomial pneumonia caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (VAP-MRSA) may be justified due to its improved efficacy compared to vancomycin. Price and cost have different magnitudes, and clinical efficacy should always be considered in the decision-making process. Our objective was to determine whether linezolid treatment was more cost-effective than vancomycin for treating VAP-MRSA. METHODOLOGY: Elaboration of an economic model from a metanalysis of previous clinical trials comparing both drugs, through a cost-effectiveness analysis. Costs of the treatments were calculated using Brazilian parameters and were compared to the results obtained in the metanalysis. In order to compare the results with real life conditions, costs were calculated for both name brand and for generic vancomycin. RESULTS: The cost (May/2004) per unit (vial, ampoule or bag) was R$ 47.73 for the name-brand vancomycin, R$ 14.45 for generic vancomycin and R$ 214.04 for linezolid. Linezolid's efficacy in VAP-MRSA according to the metanalysis was 62.2% and vancomycin's efficacy was 21.2%. The total cost per cured patient was R$ 13,231.65 for the name-brand vancomycin, R$ 11,277.59 for generic vancomycin and R$ 7,764.72 for linezolid. CONCLUSION: Despite the higher price per unit, linezolid was more cost-effective than vancomycin.
topic Linezolid
vancomycin
Staphylococcus aureus
pneumonia
ventilator
cost
pharmacoeconomic
url http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-86702005000300001&lng=en&tlng=en
work_keys_str_mv AT adaorlmachado costeffectivenessoflinezolidversusvancomycininmechanicalventilationassociatednosocomialpneumoniacausedbymethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureus
AT clovisdacunhaarns costeffectivenessoflinezolidversusvancomycininmechanicalventilationassociatednosocomialpneumoniacausedbymethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureus
AT wilsonfollador costeffectivenessoflinezolidversusvancomycininmechanicalventilationassociatednosocomialpneumoniacausedbymethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureus
AT alineguerra costeffectivenessoflinezolidversusvancomycininmechanicalventilationassociatednosocomialpneumoniacausedbymethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureus
_version_ 1724497633077100544