Cost-effectiveness of linezolid versus vancomycin in mechanical ventilation-associated nosocomial pneumonia caused by methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus
Linezolid, an oxazolidinone-class antimicrobial agent, is a new drug; its use has frequently been questioned due to its high price. However, recent trials have demonstrated that the use of linezolid in mechanical ventilation-associated nosocomial pneumonia caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococ...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Elsevier
|
Series: | Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-86702005000300001&lng=en&tlng=en |
id |
doaj-f63b516cf2984dc59339db9b74212b98 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-f63b516cf2984dc59339db9b74212b982020-11-25T03:48:42ZengElsevierBrazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases1678-43919319120010.1590/S1413-86702005000300001S1413-86702005000300001Cost-effectiveness of linezolid versus vancomycin in mechanical ventilation-associated nosocomial pneumonia caused by methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureusAdão R. L. Machado0Clovis da Cunha Arns1Wilson Follador2Aline Guerra3Institute of Hospital Administration and Health Sciences of Rio Grande do SulInstitute of Hospital Administration and Health Sciences of Rio Grande do SulInstitute of Hospital Administration and Health Sciences of Rio Grande do SulInstitute of Hospital Administration and Health Sciences of Rio Grande do SulLinezolid, an oxazolidinone-class antimicrobial agent, is a new drug; its use has frequently been questioned due to its high price. However, recent trials have demonstrated that the use of linezolid in mechanical ventilation-associated nosocomial pneumonia caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (VAP-MRSA) may be justified due to its improved efficacy compared to vancomycin. Price and cost have different magnitudes, and clinical efficacy should always be considered in the decision-making process. Our objective was to determine whether linezolid treatment was more cost-effective than vancomycin for treating VAP-MRSA. METHODOLOGY: Elaboration of an economic model from a metanalysis of previous clinical trials comparing both drugs, through a cost-effectiveness analysis. Costs of the treatments were calculated using Brazilian parameters and were compared to the results obtained in the metanalysis. In order to compare the results with real life conditions, costs were calculated for both name brand and for generic vancomycin. RESULTS: The cost (May/2004) per unit (vial, ampoule or bag) was R$ 47.73 for the name-brand vancomycin, R$ 14.45 for generic vancomycin and R$ 214.04 for linezolid. Linezolid's efficacy in VAP-MRSA according to the metanalysis was 62.2% and vancomycin's efficacy was 21.2%. The total cost per cured patient was R$ 13,231.65 for the name-brand vancomycin, R$ 11,277.59 for generic vancomycin and R$ 7,764.72 for linezolid. CONCLUSION: Despite the higher price per unit, linezolid was more cost-effective than vancomycin.http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-86702005000300001&lng=en&tlng=enLinezolidvancomycinStaphylococcus aureuspneumoniaventilatorcostpharmacoeconomic |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Adão R. L. Machado Clovis da Cunha Arns Wilson Follador Aline Guerra |
spellingShingle |
Adão R. L. Machado Clovis da Cunha Arns Wilson Follador Aline Guerra Cost-effectiveness of linezolid versus vancomycin in mechanical ventilation-associated nosocomial pneumonia caused by methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases Linezolid vancomycin Staphylococcus aureus pneumonia ventilator cost pharmacoeconomic |
author_facet |
Adão R. L. Machado Clovis da Cunha Arns Wilson Follador Aline Guerra |
author_sort |
Adão R. L. Machado |
title |
Cost-effectiveness of linezolid versus vancomycin in mechanical ventilation-associated nosocomial pneumonia caused by methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus |
title_short |
Cost-effectiveness of linezolid versus vancomycin in mechanical ventilation-associated nosocomial pneumonia caused by methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus |
title_full |
Cost-effectiveness of linezolid versus vancomycin in mechanical ventilation-associated nosocomial pneumonia caused by methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus |
title_fullStr |
Cost-effectiveness of linezolid versus vancomycin in mechanical ventilation-associated nosocomial pneumonia caused by methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus |
title_full_unstemmed |
Cost-effectiveness of linezolid versus vancomycin in mechanical ventilation-associated nosocomial pneumonia caused by methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus |
title_sort |
cost-effectiveness of linezolid versus vancomycin in mechanical ventilation-associated nosocomial pneumonia caused by methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus |
publisher |
Elsevier |
series |
Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases |
issn |
1678-4391 |
description |
Linezolid, an oxazolidinone-class antimicrobial agent, is a new drug; its use has frequently been questioned due to its high price. However, recent trials have demonstrated that the use of linezolid in mechanical ventilation-associated nosocomial pneumonia caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (VAP-MRSA) may be justified due to its improved efficacy compared to vancomycin. Price and cost have different magnitudes, and clinical efficacy should always be considered in the decision-making process. Our objective was to determine whether linezolid treatment was more cost-effective than vancomycin for treating VAP-MRSA. METHODOLOGY: Elaboration of an economic model from a metanalysis of previous clinical trials comparing both drugs, through a cost-effectiveness analysis. Costs of the treatments were calculated using Brazilian parameters and were compared to the results obtained in the metanalysis. In order to compare the results with real life conditions, costs were calculated for both name brand and for generic vancomycin. RESULTS: The cost (May/2004) per unit (vial, ampoule or bag) was R$ 47.73 for the name-brand vancomycin, R$ 14.45 for generic vancomycin and R$ 214.04 for linezolid. Linezolid's efficacy in VAP-MRSA according to the metanalysis was 62.2% and vancomycin's efficacy was 21.2%. The total cost per cured patient was R$ 13,231.65 for the name-brand vancomycin, R$ 11,277.59 for generic vancomycin and R$ 7,764.72 for linezolid. CONCLUSION: Despite the higher price per unit, linezolid was more cost-effective than vancomycin. |
topic |
Linezolid vancomycin Staphylococcus aureus pneumonia ventilator cost pharmacoeconomic |
url |
http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-86702005000300001&lng=en&tlng=en |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT adaorlmachado costeffectivenessoflinezolidversusvancomycininmechanicalventilationassociatednosocomialpneumoniacausedbymethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureus AT clovisdacunhaarns costeffectivenessoflinezolidversusvancomycininmechanicalventilationassociatednosocomialpneumoniacausedbymethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureus AT wilsonfollador costeffectivenessoflinezolidversusvancomycininmechanicalventilationassociatednosocomialpneumoniacausedbymethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureus AT alineguerra costeffectivenessoflinezolidversusvancomycininmechanicalventilationassociatednosocomialpneumoniacausedbymethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureus |
_version_ |
1724497633077100544 |