The mental health, quality of life and life satisfaction of internally displaced persons living in Nakuru County, Kenya: a critique

Abstract The study titled ‘[t] he mental health, quality of life and life satisfaction of internally displaced persons living in Nakuru County, Kenya’ by Getanda, Papadopoulos and Evans identifies a critical area and contributed significantly to literature. Despite the contribution, there are some i...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Robson Mandishekwa
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2021-06-01
Series:BMC Public Health
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-11176-y
id doaj-f62de7dc9a584c96bc99295ec539de6c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f62de7dc9a584c96bc99295ec539de6c2021-06-27T11:04:05ZengBMCBMC Public Health1471-24582021-06-012111310.1186/s12889-021-11176-yThe mental health, quality of life and life satisfaction of internally displaced persons living in Nakuru County, Kenya: a critiqueRobson Mandishekwa0Department of Economics, Midlands State UniversityAbstract The study titled ‘[t] he mental health, quality of life and life satisfaction of internally displaced persons living in Nakuru County, Kenya’ by Getanda, Papadopoulos and Evans identifies a critical area and contributed significantly to literature. Despite the contribution, there are some issues in that study that deserve attention. For example, the use of the satisfaction with life scale instead of the temporal satisfaction with life scale, for a pre-and post-displacement study, is questionable. It is important to note that the scores from the satisfaction with life scale can only measure life satisfaction at a particular point while the temporal satisfaction with life can be used to determine life satisfaction between pre-and post-displacement periods. Again, conflicting statements in the abstract and methods sections have been noted, where the abstract refers to refugee camps while methods refer to internally displaced persons’ camps. Finally, some reported statistics have been found to have errors. It is important to highlight these critical issues to readers for a better understanding. This study, therefore, endeavours to critique that study and clarify some of these issues so that readers get better understandings. Recommendations for future studies are made.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-11176-ySatisfaction with lifeInternally displaced personsTemporal satisfaction with life scale
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Robson Mandishekwa
spellingShingle Robson Mandishekwa
The mental health, quality of life and life satisfaction of internally displaced persons living in Nakuru County, Kenya: a critique
BMC Public Health
Satisfaction with life
Internally displaced persons
Temporal satisfaction with life scale
author_facet Robson Mandishekwa
author_sort Robson Mandishekwa
title The mental health, quality of life and life satisfaction of internally displaced persons living in Nakuru County, Kenya: a critique
title_short The mental health, quality of life and life satisfaction of internally displaced persons living in Nakuru County, Kenya: a critique
title_full The mental health, quality of life and life satisfaction of internally displaced persons living in Nakuru County, Kenya: a critique
title_fullStr The mental health, quality of life and life satisfaction of internally displaced persons living in Nakuru County, Kenya: a critique
title_full_unstemmed The mental health, quality of life and life satisfaction of internally displaced persons living in Nakuru County, Kenya: a critique
title_sort mental health, quality of life and life satisfaction of internally displaced persons living in nakuru county, kenya: a critique
publisher BMC
series BMC Public Health
issn 1471-2458
publishDate 2021-06-01
description Abstract The study titled ‘[t] he mental health, quality of life and life satisfaction of internally displaced persons living in Nakuru County, Kenya’ by Getanda, Papadopoulos and Evans identifies a critical area and contributed significantly to literature. Despite the contribution, there are some issues in that study that deserve attention. For example, the use of the satisfaction with life scale instead of the temporal satisfaction with life scale, for a pre-and post-displacement study, is questionable. It is important to note that the scores from the satisfaction with life scale can only measure life satisfaction at a particular point while the temporal satisfaction with life can be used to determine life satisfaction between pre-and post-displacement periods. Again, conflicting statements in the abstract and methods sections have been noted, where the abstract refers to refugee camps while methods refer to internally displaced persons’ camps. Finally, some reported statistics have been found to have errors. It is important to highlight these critical issues to readers for a better understanding. This study, therefore, endeavours to critique that study and clarify some of these issues so that readers get better understandings. Recommendations for future studies are made.
topic Satisfaction with life
Internally displaced persons
Temporal satisfaction with life scale
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-11176-y
work_keys_str_mv AT robsonmandishekwa thementalhealthqualityoflifeandlifesatisfactionofinternallydisplacedpersonslivinginnakurucountykenyaacritique
AT robsonmandishekwa mentalhealthqualityoflifeandlifesatisfactionofinternallydisplacedpersonslivinginnakurucountykenyaacritique
_version_ 1721358334409310208