Understanding the contributions of aerosol properties and parameterization discrepancies to droplet number variability in a global climate model

Aerosol indirect effects in climate models strongly depend on the representation of the aerosol activation process. In this study, we assess the process-level differences across activation parameterizations that contribute to droplet number uncertainty by using the adjoints of the Abdul-Razzak and G...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: R. Morales Betancourt, A. Nenes
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2014-05-01
Series:Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
Online Access:http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/14/4809/2014/acp-14-4809-2014.pdf
id doaj-f61f753701964942a4a9286ed01d9252
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f61f753701964942a4a9286ed01d92522020-11-24T21:18:35ZengCopernicus PublicationsAtmospheric Chemistry and Physics1680-73161680-73242014-05-011494809482610.5194/acp-14-4809-2014Understanding the contributions of aerosol properties and parameterization discrepancies to droplet number variability in a global climate modelR. Morales Betancourt0A. Nenes1School of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, USASchool of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, USAAerosol indirect effects in climate models strongly depend on the representation of the aerosol activation process. In this study, we assess the process-level differences across activation parameterizations that contribute to droplet number uncertainty by using the adjoints of the Abdul-Razzak and Ghan (2000) and Fountoukis and Nenes (2005) droplet activation parameterizations in the framework of the Community Atmospheric Model version 5.1 (CAM5.1). The adjoint sensitivities of <i>N</i><sub>d</sub> to relevant input parameters are used to (i) unravel the spatially resolved contribution of aerosol number, mass, and chemical composition to changes in <i>N</i><sub>d</sub> between present-day and pre-industrial simulations and (ii) identify the key variables responsible for the differences in <i>N</i><sub>d</sub> fields and aerosol indirect effect estimates when different activation schemes are used within the same modeling framework. The sensitivities are computed online at minimal computational cost. Changes in aerosol number and aerosol mass concentrations were found to contribute to <i>N</i><sub>d</sub> differences much more strongly than chemical composition effects. The main sources of discrepancy between the activation parameterizations considered were the treatment of the water uptake by coarse mode particles, and the sensitivity of the parameterized <i>N</i><sub>d</sub> accumulation mode aerosol geometric mean diameter. These two factors explain the different predictions of <i>N</i><sub>d</sub> over land and over oceans when these parameterizations are employed. Discrepancies in the sensitivity to aerosol size are responsible for an exaggerated response to aerosol volume changes over heavily polluted regions. Because these regions are collocated with areas of deep clouds, their impact on shortwave cloud forcing is amplified through liquid water path changes. The same framework is also utilized to efficiently explore droplet number uncertainty attributable to hygroscopicity parameter of organic aerosol (primary and secondary). Comparisons between the parameterization-derived sensitivities of droplet number against predictions with detailed numerical simulations of the activation process were performed to validate the physical consistency of the adjoint sensitivities.http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/14/4809/2014/acp-14-4809-2014.pdf
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author R. Morales Betancourt
A. Nenes
spellingShingle R. Morales Betancourt
A. Nenes
Understanding the contributions of aerosol properties and parameterization discrepancies to droplet number variability in a global climate model
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
author_facet R. Morales Betancourt
A. Nenes
author_sort R. Morales Betancourt
title Understanding the contributions of aerosol properties and parameterization discrepancies to droplet number variability in a global climate model
title_short Understanding the contributions of aerosol properties and parameterization discrepancies to droplet number variability in a global climate model
title_full Understanding the contributions of aerosol properties and parameterization discrepancies to droplet number variability in a global climate model
title_fullStr Understanding the contributions of aerosol properties and parameterization discrepancies to droplet number variability in a global climate model
title_full_unstemmed Understanding the contributions of aerosol properties and parameterization discrepancies to droplet number variability in a global climate model
title_sort understanding the contributions of aerosol properties and parameterization discrepancies to droplet number variability in a global climate model
publisher Copernicus Publications
series Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
issn 1680-7316
1680-7324
publishDate 2014-05-01
description Aerosol indirect effects in climate models strongly depend on the representation of the aerosol activation process. In this study, we assess the process-level differences across activation parameterizations that contribute to droplet number uncertainty by using the adjoints of the Abdul-Razzak and Ghan (2000) and Fountoukis and Nenes (2005) droplet activation parameterizations in the framework of the Community Atmospheric Model version 5.1 (CAM5.1). The adjoint sensitivities of <i>N</i><sub>d</sub> to relevant input parameters are used to (i) unravel the spatially resolved contribution of aerosol number, mass, and chemical composition to changes in <i>N</i><sub>d</sub> between present-day and pre-industrial simulations and (ii) identify the key variables responsible for the differences in <i>N</i><sub>d</sub> fields and aerosol indirect effect estimates when different activation schemes are used within the same modeling framework. The sensitivities are computed online at minimal computational cost. Changes in aerosol number and aerosol mass concentrations were found to contribute to <i>N</i><sub>d</sub> differences much more strongly than chemical composition effects. The main sources of discrepancy between the activation parameterizations considered were the treatment of the water uptake by coarse mode particles, and the sensitivity of the parameterized <i>N</i><sub>d</sub> accumulation mode aerosol geometric mean diameter. These two factors explain the different predictions of <i>N</i><sub>d</sub> over land and over oceans when these parameterizations are employed. Discrepancies in the sensitivity to aerosol size are responsible for an exaggerated response to aerosol volume changes over heavily polluted regions. Because these regions are collocated with areas of deep clouds, their impact on shortwave cloud forcing is amplified through liquid water path changes. The same framework is also utilized to efficiently explore droplet number uncertainty attributable to hygroscopicity parameter of organic aerosol (primary and secondary). Comparisons between the parameterization-derived sensitivities of droplet number against predictions with detailed numerical simulations of the activation process were performed to validate the physical consistency of the adjoint sensitivities.
url http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/14/4809/2014/acp-14-4809-2014.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT rmoralesbetancourt understandingthecontributionsofaerosolpropertiesandparameterizationdiscrepanciestodropletnumbervariabilityinaglobalclimatemodel
AT anenes understandingthecontributionsofaerosolpropertiesandparameterizationdiscrepanciestodropletnumbervariabilityinaglobalclimatemodel
_version_ 1726008422089883648