Predicting the Number of Publications for Scholarly Networks

Scholarly networks have attracted great attentions, such as scholarly impact evaluation, scholarly impact prediction, scholarly recommendation, co-author relationships analysis, and team identification. Ranking research institutions as an important aspect of scholarly impact research is of great sig...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Xiaomei Bai
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: IEEE 2018-01-01
Series:IEEE Access
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8307066/
id doaj-f5fdef6f3a3d45098c52ac76c0a3a756
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f5fdef6f3a3d45098c52ac76c0a3a7562021-03-29T20:40:08ZengIEEEIEEE Access2169-35362018-01-016118421184810.1109/ACCESS.2018.28128048307066Predicting the Number of Publications for Scholarly NetworksXiaomei Bai0https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9826-4802Computing Center, Anshan Normal University, Anshan, ChinaScholarly networks have attracted great attentions, such as scholarly impact evaluation, scholarly impact prediction, scholarly recommendation, co-author relationships analysis, and team identification. Ranking research institutions as an important aspect of scholarly impact research is of great significance for decision makers, such as funding allocation, promotion, and transfer. There has been much debate about the scientific correctness behind those rankings. Predicting the number of accepted conference papers of research institutions next year is proposed by KDD Cup 2016, which aims to measure the impact of research institutions. To accurately predict the impact of different institutions in the eight top conferences: FSE, ICML, KDD, MM, MobiCom, SIGCOMM, SIGIR, and SIGMOD, a novel model was proposed in which the number of accepted papers of each institution, country, and time factors driving the impact of institution change are used as training features. Correspondingly, a hybrid model of support vector machine and neural network is constructed for resolving the predictive task. The experimental results show that the proposed method is better than the Markov model and the neural network model in terms of normalized discounted cumulative gain.https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8307066/Ranking research institutionpredictive modelsupport vector machine
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Xiaomei Bai
spellingShingle Xiaomei Bai
Predicting the Number of Publications for Scholarly Networks
IEEE Access
Ranking research institution
predictive model
support vector machine
author_facet Xiaomei Bai
author_sort Xiaomei Bai
title Predicting the Number of Publications for Scholarly Networks
title_short Predicting the Number of Publications for Scholarly Networks
title_full Predicting the Number of Publications for Scholarly Networks
title_fullStr Predicting the Number of Publications for Scholarly Networks
title_full_unstemmed Predicting the Number of Publications for Scholarly Networks
title_sort predicting the number of publications for scholarly networks
publisher IEEE
series IEEE Access
issn 2169-3536
publishDate 2018-01-01
description Scholarly networks have attracted great attentions, such as scholarly impact evaluation, scholarly impact prediction, scholarly recommendation, co-author relationships analysis, and team identification. Ranking research institutions as an important aspect of scholarly impact research is of great significance for decision makers, such as funding allocation, promotion, and transfer. There has been much debate about the scientific correctness behind those rankings. Predicting the number of accepted conference papers of research institutions next year is proposed by KDD Cup 2016, which aims to measure the impact of research institutions. To accurately predict the impact of different institutions in the eight top conferences: FSE, ICML, KDD, MM, MobiCom, SIGCOMM, SIGIR, and SIGMOD, a novel model was proposed in which the number of accepted papers of each institution, country, and time factors driving the impact of institution change are used as training features. Correspondingly, a hybrid model of support vector machine and neural network is constructed for resolving the predictive task. The experimental results show that the proposed method is better than the Markov model and the neural network model in terms of normalized discounted cumulative gain.
topic Ranking research institution
predictive model
support vector machine
url https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8307066/
work_keys_str_mv AT xiaomeibai predictingthenumberofpublicationsforscholarlynetworks
_version_ 1724194416840671232