A critical juncture in universal healthcare: insights from South Korea’s COVID-19 experience for the United Kingdom to consider
Abstract Universal healthcare systems have undergone a severe stress test in the form of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. With respect to the system-embedded allocation of decision-making powers and responsibilities among actors, different modalities have been revealed in the COVID-19 responses of Sou...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Springer Nature
2021-03-01
|
Series: | Humanities & Social Sciences Communications |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-021-00731-y |
id |
doaj-f5f2d6fed2b7426abae16d817e160452 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-f5f2d6fed2b7426abae16d817e1604522021-03-11T11:17:59ZengSpringer NatureHumanities & Social Sciences Communications2662-99922021-03-01811910.1057/s41599-021-00731-yA critical juncture in universal healthcare: insights from South Korea’s COVID-19 experience for the United Kingdom to considerKyungmoo Heo0Keonyeong Jeong1Daejoong Lee2Yongseok Seo3Moon Soul Graduate School of Future Strategy, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST)Moon Soul Graduate School of Future Strategy, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST)Development Finance Division, Korea Ministry of Economy and FinanceMoon Soul Graduate School of Future Strategy, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST)Abstract Universal healthcare systems have undergone a severe stress test in the form of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. With respect to the system-embedded allocation of decision-making powers and responsibilities among actors, different modalities have been revealed in the COVID-19 responses of South Korea and the UK, respectively. This article compares and analyzes how these two countries’ healthcare systems have reacted to COVID-19. Although both have implemented similar responsive measures, the UK has recorded a higher number of confirmed cases per thousand people and a higher death rate. Based on the analysis on which this paper is built, the key differences between the two systems are the UK system’s lack of: (1) appropriate medical equipment and technologies along with the human resources; and (2) flexible policy options to incentivize healthcare providers and induce cooperation from the public in a time of national crisis. The UK’s healthcare system is now approaching a critical juncture. The expansion of internal competition, which was introduced to the system in 1991, can serve as means of initiating a resolution to the above-mentioned issues and further reform its system. Under the UK government’s close supervision and precise control, allowing non-reimbursable special medical treatment in the system and widening public choice of medical services would be a suitable policy approach promoting internal competition while at the same time maintaining the UK’s devotion to universal healthcare. The underlying implication of internal competition though is the sharing of decision-making powers and responsibilities with societal and private sectors by inducing and facilitating participation at all levels. Fighting against COVID-19 however is widely considered ‘all-out-war.’ Under the UK government’s supervision and control, it is time for society to step up and fight the pandemic together.https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-021-00731-y |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Kyungmoo Heo Keonyeong Jeong Daejoong Lee Yongseok Seo |
spellingShingle |
Kyungmoo Heo Keonyeong Jeong Daejoong Lee Yongseok Seo A critical juncture in universal healthcare: insights from South Korea’s COVID-19 experience for the United Kingdom to consider Humanities & Social Sciences Communications |
author_facet |
Kyungmoo Heo Keonyeong Jeong Daejoong Lee Yongseok Seo |
author_sort |
Kyungmoo Heo |
title |
A critical juncture in universal healthcare: insights from South Korea’s COVID-19 experience for the United Kingdom to consider |
title_short |
A critical juncture in universal healthcare: insights from South Korea’s COVID-19 experience for the United Kingdom to consider |
title_full |
A critical juncture in universal healthcare: insights from South Korea’s COVID-19 experience for the United Kingdom to consider |
title_fullStr |
A critical juncture in universal healthcare: insights from South Korea’s COVID-19 experience for the United Kingdom to consider |
title_full_unstemmed |
A critical juncture in universal healthcare: insights from South Korea’s COVID-19 experience for the United Kingdom to consider |
title_sort |
critical juncture in universal healthcare: insights from south korea’s covid-19 experience for the united kingdom to consider |
publisher |
Springer Nature |
series |
Humanities & Social Sciences Communications |
issn |
2662-9992 |
publishDate |
2021-03-01 |
description |
Abstract Universal healthcare systems have undergone a severe stress test in the form of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. With respect to the system-embedded allocation of decision-making powers and responsibilities among actors, different modalities have been revealed in the COVID-19 responses of South Korea and the UK, respectively. This article compares and analyzes how these two countries’ healthcare systems have reacted to COVID-19. Although both have implemented similar responsive measures, the UK has recorded a higher number of confirmed cases per thousand people and a higher death rate. Based on the analysis on which this paper is built, the key differences between the two systems are the UK system’s lack of: (1) appropriate medical equipment and technologies along with the human resources; and (2) flexible policy options to incentivize healthcare providers and induce cooperation from the public in a time of national crisis. The UK’s healthcare system is now approaching a critical juncture. The expansion of internal competition, which was introduced to the system in 1991, can serve as means of initiating a resolution to the above-mentioned issues and further reform its system. Under the UK government’s close supervision and precise control, allowing non-reimbursable special medical treatment in the system and widening public choice of medical services would be a suitable policy approach promoting internal competition while at the same time maintaining the UK’s devotion to universal healthcare. The underlying implication of internal competition though is the sharing of decision-making powers and responsibilities with societal and private sectors by inducing and facilitating participation at all levels. Fighting against COVID-19 however is widely considered ‘all-out-war.’ Under the UK government’s supervision and control, it is time for society to step up and fight the pandemic together. |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-021-00731-y |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT kyungmooheo acriticaljunctureinuniversalhealthcareinsightsfromsouthkoreascovid19experiencefortheunitedkingdomtoconsider AT keonyeongjeong acriticaljunctureinuniversalhealthcareinsightsfromsouthkoreascovid19experiencefortheunitedkingdomtoconsider AT daejoonglee acriticaljunctureinuniversalhealthcareinsightsfromsouthkoreascovid19experiencefortheunitedkingdomtoconsider AT yongseokseo acriticaljunctureinuniversalhealthcareinsightsfromsouthkoreascovid19experiencefortheunitedkingdomtoconsider AT kyungmooheo criticaljunctureinuniversalhealthcareinsightsfromsouthkoreascovid19experiencefortheunitedkingdomtoconsider AT keonyeongjeong criticaljunctureinuniversalhealthcareinsightsfromsouthkoreascovid19experiencefortheunitedkingdomtoconsider AT daejoonglee criticaljunctureinuniversalhealthcareinsightsfromsouthkoreascovid19experiencefortheunitedkingdomtoconsider AT yongseokseo criticaljunctureinuniversalhealthcareinsightsfromsouthkoreascovid19experiencefortheunitedkingdomtoconsider |
_version_ |
1724225766704545792 |