Facial flatness indices: application in orthodontics

Facial flatness indices have been used in anthropology to discern differences among populations. They were evaluated on skulls from around the world. Aims (1) to evaluate the use of facial flatness indices in orthodontics and (2) to assess their variation among malocclusions, age and sex. Materials...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chimène Chalala, Maria Saadeh, Fouad Ayoub
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: PeerJ Inc. 2019-05-01
Series:PeerJ
Subjects:
Online Access:https://peerj.com/articles/6889.pdf
id doaj-f5e08cfec53b456cb78ff64ba8c4d1a6
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f5e08cfec53b456cb78ff64ba8c4d1a62020-11-24T21:16:54ZengPeerJ Inc.PeerJ2167-83592019-05-017e688910.7717/peerj.6889Facial flatness indices: application in orthodonticsChimène Chalala0Maria Saadeh1Fouad Ayoub2Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Lebanese University and American University of Beirut, Beirut, LebanonDepartment of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Lebanese University and American University of Beirut, Beirut, LebanonDepartment of Forensic Odontology, Anthropology and Human Identification, Lebanese University, Beirut, LebanonFacial flatness indices have been used in anthropology to discern differences among populations. They were evaluated on skulls from around the world. Aims (1) to evaluate the use of facial flatness indices in orthodontics and (2) to assess their variation among malocclusions, age and sex. Materials and Methods A total of 322 cone beam computed tomography radiographs were digitized and three facial indices (frontal, simotic and zygomaxillary) along with three transverse distances (fmo1–fmo2, zma1–zma2 and n1–n2) were assessed and compared between different groups. Results The zygomaxillary index was increased in Class II (32.6 ± 0.42; p < 0.001) and decreased in Class III malocclusions (29.4 ± 0.66; p < 0.001) compared to Class I (31.18 ± 0.3; p < 0.001). The frontal and nasal flatness are not characteristic features of any of the sagittal malocclusions. Facial flatness indices did not differ between males and females and between growing and non-growing patients. Conclusion The position of subspinale point (A point) forward or backward relative to the zygomaxillary width is a factor of assessment of facial flatness. The zygomaxillary index could be helpful in weighting proportionally the width of the maxilla (expansion) relative to its sagittal position in Class II and Class III malocclusions.https://peerj.com/articles/6889.pdfFacial flatness indicesMalocclusionsOrthodonticsAnthropology
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Chimène Chalala
Maria Saadeh
Fouad Ayoub
spellingShingle Chimène Chalala
Maria Saadeh
Fouad Ayoub
Facial flatness indices: application in orthodontics
PeerJ
Facial flatness indices
Malocclusions
Orthodontics
Anthropology
author_facet Chimène Chalala
Maria Saadeh
Fouad Ayoub
author_sort Chimène Chalala
title Facial flatness indices: application in orthodontics
title_short Facial flatness indices: application in orthodontics
title_full Facial flatness indices: application in orthodontics
title_fullStr Facial flatness indices: application in orthodontics
title_full_unstemmed Facial flatness indices: application in orthodontics
title_sort facial flatness indices: application in orthodontics
publisher PeerJ Inc.
series PeerJ
issn 2167-8359
publishDate 2019-05-01
description Facial flatness indices have been used in anthropology to discern differences among populations. They were evaluated on skulls from around the world. Aims (1) to evaluate the use of facial flatness indices in orthodontics and (2) to assess their variation among malocclusions, age and sex. Materials and Methods A total of 322 cone beam computed tomography radiographs were digitized and three facial indices (frontal, simotic and zygomaxillary) along with three transverse distances (fmo1–fmo2, zma1–zma2 and n1–n2) were assessed and compared between different groups. Results The zygomaxillary index was increased in Class II (32.6 ± 0.42; p < 0.001) and decreased in Class III malocclusions (29.4 ± 0.66; p < 0.001) compared to Class I (31.18 ± 0.3; p < 0.001). The frontal and nasal flatness are not characteristic features of any of the sagittal malocclusions. Facial flatness indices did not differ between males and females and between growing and non-growing patients. Conclusion The position of subspinale point (A point) forward or backward relative to the zygomaxillary width is a factor of assessment of facial flatness. The zygomaxillary index could be helpful in weighting proportionally the width of the maxilla (expansion) relative to its sagittal position in Class II and Class III malocclusions.
topic Facial flatness indices
Malocclusions
Orthodontics
Anthropology
url https://peerj.com/articles/6889.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT chimenechalala facialflatnessindicesapplicationinorthodontics
AT mariasaadeh facialflatnessindicesapplicationinorthodontics
AT fouadayoub facialflatnessindicesapplicationinorthodontics
_version_ 1726015300724326400