Transdisciplinary working to shape systematic reviews and interpret the findings: commentary
Abstract Important policy questions tend to span a range of academic disciplines, and the relevant research is often carried out in a variety of social, economic and geographic contexts. In efforts to synthesise research to help inform decisions arising from the policy questions, systematic reviews...
Main Authors: | Sandy Oliver, Paul Garner, Pete Heywood, Janet Jull, Kelly Dickson, Mukdarut Bangpan, Lynn Ang, Morel Fourman, Ruth Garside |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2017-11-01
|
Series: | Environmental Evidence |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13750-017-0106-y |
Similar Items
-
Exploring issues in the conduct of website searching and other online sources for systematic reviews: how can we be systematic?
by: Claire Stansfield, et al.
Published: (2016-11-01) -
Mental health and psychosocial support programmes for adults in humanitarian emergencies: a systematic review and meta-analysis in low and middle-income countries
by: Mukdarut Bangpan, et al.
Published: (2019-09-01) -
Transdisciplinary unifying implications of circadian findings in the 1950s
by: Otsuka Kuniaki, et al.
Published: (2003-10-01) -
The principle and interpretation of transdisciplinary researches in risk prediction and management by cybernetics
by: XU,SHAO-WEI, et al.
Published: (2018) -
Commentary to: “Transdisciplinary Management of Patients with Disorders of Sex Development in Colombia. Limiting Factors for an Appropriate Management”
by: Nicolas Fernandez
Published: (2018-07-01)