How Many Is Too Many? On the Relationship between Research Productivity and Impact.

Over the last few decades, the institutionalisation of quantitative research evaluations has created incentives for scholars to publish as many papers as possible. This paper assesses the effects of such incentives on individual researchers' scientific impact, by analysing the relationship betw...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Vincent Larivière, Rodrigo Costas
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2016-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5040433?pdf=render
id doaj-f5d6c3a9832c42c5aec0ba609e87bef4
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f5d6c3a9832c42c5aec0ba609e87bef42020-11-25T02:13:29ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032016-01-01119e016270910.1371/journal.pone.0162709How Many Is Too Many? On the Relationship between Research Productivity and Impact.Vincent LarivièreRodrigo CostasOver the last few decades, the institutionalisation of quantitative research evaluations has created incentives for scholars to publish as many papers as possible. This paper assesses the effects of such incentives on individual researchers' scientific impact, by analysing the relationship between their number of articles and their proportion of highly cited papers. In other words, does the share of an author's top 1% most cited papers increase, remain stable, or decrease as his/her total number of papers increase? Using a large dataset of disambiguated researchers (N = 28,078,476) over the 1980-2013 period, this paper shows that, on average, the higher the number of papers a researcher publishes, the higher the proportion of these papers are amongst the most cited. This relationship is stronger for older cohorts of researchers, while decreasing returns to scale are observed for recent cohorts. On the whole, these results suggest that for established researchers, the strategy of publishing as many papers as possible did not yield lower shares of highly cited publications, but such a pattern is not always observed for younger scholars.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5040433?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Vincent Larivière
Rodrigo Costas
spellingShingle Vincent Larivière
Rodrigo Costas
How Many Is Too Many? On the Relationship between Research Productivity and Impact.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Vincent Larivière
Rodrigo Costas
author_sort Vincent Larivière
title How Many Is Too Many? On the Relationship between Research Productivity and Impact.
title_short How Many Is Too Many? On the Relationship between Research Productivity and Impact.
title_full How Many Is Too Many? On the Relationship between Research Productivity and Impact.
title_fullStr How Many Is Too Many? On the Relationship between Research Productivity and Impact.
title_full_unstemmed How Many Is Too Many? On the Relationship between Research Productivity and Impact.
title_sort how many is too many? on the relationship between research productivity and impact.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2016-01-01
description Over the last few decades, the institutionalisation of quantitative research evaluations has created incentives for scholars to publish as many papers as possible. This paper assesses the effects of such incentives on individual researchers' scientific impact, by analysing the relationship between their number of articles and their proportion of highly cited papers. In other words, does the share of an author's top 1% most cited papers increase, remain stable, or decrease as his/her total number of papers increase? Using a large dataset of disambiguated researchers (N = 28,078,476) over the 1980-2013 period, this paper shows that, on average, the higher the number of papers a researcher publishes, the higher the proportion of these papers are amongst the most cited. This relationship is stronger for older cohorts of researchers, while decreasing returns to scale are observed for recent cohorts. On the whole, these results suggest that for established researchers, the strategy of publishing as many papers as possible did not yield lower shares of highly cited publications, but such a pattern is not always observed for younger scholars.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5040433?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT vincentlariviere howmanyistoomanyontherelationshipbetweenresearchproductivityandimpact
AT rodrigocostas howmanyistoomanyontherelationshipbetweenresearchproductivityandimpact
_version_ 1724904952604655616