Anticancer drugs in the aquatic ecosystem: Environmental occurrence, ecotoxicological effect and risk assessment
Anticancer drugs are a group of therapeutic agents used to enhance cell death in targeted cell types of neoplasia. Because of frequent use and eventual discharge, they have been often detected in wastewater from pharmaceutical factories and hospitals, domestic wastewater, and surface waters. The occ...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Elsevier
2021-08-01
|
Series: | Environment International |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160412021001689 |
id |
doaj-f5cdf762596647178ff8d8e28363751b |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Dan Li Hongxing Chen Hongsong Liu Daniel Schlenk Jingli Mu Silvia Lacorte Guang-Guo Ying Lingtian Xie |
spellingShingle |
Dan Li Hongxing Chen Hongsong Liu Daniel Schlenk Jingli Mu Silvia Lacorte Guang-Guo Ying Lingtian Xie Anticancer drugs in the aquatic ecosystem: Environmental occurrence, ecotoxicological effect and risk assessment Environment International Antineoplastics Freshwater ecosystems Aquatic organisms Species sensitivity distribution Hazard quotient |
author_facet |
Dan Li Hongxing Chen Hongsong Liu Daniel Schlenk Jingli Mu Silvia Lacorte Guang-Guo Ying Lingtian Xie |
author_sort |
Dan Li |
title |
Anticancer drugs in the aquatic ecosystem: Environmental occurrence, ecotoxicological effect and risk assessment |
title_short |
Anticancer drugs in the aquatic ecosystem: Environmental occurrence, ecotoxicological effect and risk assessment |
title_full |
Anticancer drugs in the aquatic ecosystem: Environmental occurrence, ecotoxicological effect and risk assessment |
title_fullStr |
Anticancer drugs in the aquatic ecosystem: Environmental occurrence, ecotoxicological effect and risk assessment |
title_full_unstemmed |
Anticancer drugs in the aquatic ecosystem: Environmental occurrence, ecotoxicological effect and risk assessment |
title_sort |
anticancer drugs in the aquatic ecosystem: environmental occurrence, ecotoxicological effect and risk assessment |
publisher |
Elsevier |
series |
Environment International |
issn |
0160-4120 |
publishDate |
2021-08-01 |
description |
Anticancer drugs are a group of therapeutic agents used to enhance cell death in targeted cell types of neoplasia. Because of frequent use and eventual discharge, they have been often detected in wastewater from pharmaceutical factories and hospitals, domestic wastewater, and surface waters. The occurrence of these drugs in aquatic ecosystems and their effects on aquatic organisms have been poorly characterized. This review focuses on the global occurrence of major classes of anticancer drugs in water and sediments of freshwater ecosystems and their ecotoxicological effects at different biological levels. While the availability of data is fairly limited, concentrations of most anticancer drugs range from < 2 ng/L to 762 µg/L in receiving water, while levels in sediments and sludge vary from 0.25 to 42.5 µg/kg. Their detection frequencies were 58%, 52% (78%) and 59% in hospital wastewater, wastewater treatment plant effluents (influents) and surface water, respectively. Predicted log Kow values of vincristine, imatinib mesylate and tamoxifen are higher than 3 and have estimated half-lives>60 d in waters using quantitative structure–activity relationship models, indicating high potential for persistence and bioaccumulation. Based on a species sensitivity distribution evaluation of 9 compounds, crustaceans are most sensitive to anticancer drugs. The most hazardous compound is cisplatin which has a hazard concentration at the 5th percentile. For Daphnia magna, the acute toxicities of major classes of anticancer drugs are ranked as platinum complexes > endocrine therapy agents > antibiotics > antimetabolite agents > alkylating agents. Using hazard quotient analysis based primarily on the lowest observed effect concentrations (LOECs), cyclophosphamide, cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil, imatinib mesylate, bicalutamide, etoposide and paclitaxel have the highest hazard for aquatic organisms. Further research is needed to identify appropriate chronic endpoints for risk assessment thresholds as well as to better understand the mechanisms of action and the potential multigenerational toxicity, and trophic transfer in ecosystems. |
topic |
Antineoplastics Freshwater ecosystems Aquatic organisms Species sensitivity distribution Hazard quotient |
url |
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160412021001689 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT danli anticancerdrugsintheaquaticecosystemenvironmentaloccurrenceecotoxicologicaleffectandriskassessment AT hongxingchen anticancerdrugsintheaquaticecosystemenvironmentaloccurrenceecotoxicologicaleffectandriskassessment AT hongsongliu anticancerdrugsintheaquaticecosystemenvironmentaloccurrenceecotoxicologicaleffectandriskassessment AT danielschlenk anticancerdrugsintheaquaticecosystemenvironmentaloccurrenceecotoxicologicaleffectandriskassessment AT jinglimu anticancerdrugsintheaquaticecosystemenvironmentaloccurrenceecotoxicologicaleffectandriskassessment AT silvialacorte anticancerdrugsintheaquaticecosystemenvironmentaloccurrenceecotoxicologicaleffectandriskassessment AT guangguoying anticancerdrugsintheaquaticecosystemenvironmentaloccurrenceecotoxicologicaleffectandriskassessment AT lingtianxie anticancerdrugsintheaquaticecosystemenvironmentaloccurrenceecotoxicologicaleffectandriskassessment |
_version_ |
1721430943365857280 |
spelling |
doaj-f5cdf762596647178ff8d8e28363751b2021-05-22T04:35:21ZengElsevierEnvironment International0160-41202021-08-01153106543Anticancer drugs in the aquatic ecosystem: Environmental occurrence, ecotoxicological effect and risk assessmentDan Li0Hongxing Chen1Hongsong Liu2Daniel Schlenk3Jingli Mu4Silvia Lacorte5Guang-Guo Ying6Lingtian Xie7SCNU Environmental Research Institute, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Chemical Pollution and Environmental Safety & MOE Key Laboratory of Theoretical Chemistry of Environment, South China Normal University, Guangzhou 510006, China; School of Environment, South China Normal University, University Town, Guangzhou 510006, ChinaSCNU Environmental Research Institute, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Chemical Pollution and Environmental Safety & MOE Key Laboratory of Theoretical Chemistry of Environment, South China Normal University, Guangzhou 510006, China; School of Environment, South China Normal University, University Town, Guangzhou 510006, ChinaSCNU Environmental Research Institute, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Chemical Pollution and Environmental Safety & MOE Key Laboratory of Theoretical Chemistry of Environment, South China Normal University, Guangzhou 510006, China; School of Environment, South China Normal University, University Town, Guangzhou 510006, ChinaDepartment of Environmental Sciences, University of California Riverside, Riverside, CA 92507, USAFujian Key Laboratory of Functional Marine Sensing Materials, Institute of Oceanography, Minjiang University, Fuzhou 350108, ChinaDepartment of Environmental Chemistry, IDAEA-CSIC, Jordi Girona 18-26, 08034 Barcelona, SpainSCNU Environmental Research Institute, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Chemical Pollution and Environmental Safety & MOE Key Laboratory of Theoretical Chemistry of Environment, South China Normal University, Guangzhou 510006, China; School of Environment, South China Normal University, University Town, Guangzhou 510006, China; Corresponding authors at: School of Environment, South China Normal University, University Town, West Waihuan Road 378, Guangzhou 510006, China.SCNU Environmental Research Institute, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Chemical Pollution and Environmental Safety & MOE Key Laboratory of Theoretical Chemistry of Environment, South China Normal University, Guangzhou 510006, China; School of Environment, South China Normal University, University Town, Guangzhou 510006, China; Corresponding authors at: School of Environment, South China Normal University, University Town, West Waihuan Road 378, Guangzhou 510006, China.Anticancer drugs are a group of therapeutic agents used to enhance cell death in targeted cell types of neoplasia. Because of frequent use and eventual discharge, they have been often detected in wastewater from pharmaceutical factories and hospitals, domestic wastewater, and surface waters. The occurrence of these drugs in aquatic ecosystems and their effects on aquatic organisms have been poorly characterized. This review focuses on the global occurrence of major classes of anticancer drugs in water and sediments of freshwater ecosystems and their ecotoxicological effects at different biological levels. While the availability of data is fairly limited, concentrations of most anticancer drugs range from < 2 ng/L to 762 µg/L in receiving water, while levels in sediments and sludge vary from 0.25 to 42.5 µg/kg. Their detection frequencies were 58%, 52% (78%) and 59% in hospital wastewater, wastewater treatment plant effluents (influents) and surface water, respectively. Predicted log Kow values of vincristine, imatinib mesylate and tamoxifen are higher than 3 and have estimated half-lives>60 d in waters using quantitative structure–activity relationship models, indicating high potential for persistence and bioaccumulation. Based on a species sensitivity distribution evaluation of 9 compounds, crustaceans are most sensitive to anticancer drugs. The most hazardous compound is cisplatin which has a hazard concentration at the 5th percentile. For Daphnia magna, the acute toxicities of major classes of anticancer drugs are ranked as platinum complexes > endocrine therapy agents > antibiotics > antimetabolite agents > alkylating agents. Using hazard quotient analysis based primarily on the lowest observed effect concentrations (LOECs), cyclophosphamide, cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil, imatinib mesylate, bicalutamide, etoposide and paclitaxel have the highest hazard for aquatic organisms. Further research is needed to identify appropriate chronic endpoints for risk assessment thresholds as well as to better understand the mechanisms of action and the potential multigenerational toxicity, and trophic transfer in ecosystems.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160412021001689AntineoplasticsFreshwater ecosystemsAquatic organismsSpecies sensitivity distributionHazard quotient |