Endangered Intellect: A Case Study of Clinton Vs Trump Campaign Discourse
This study investigates political language and political discourse with a focus on anti-intellectualism that is interpreted from two different but related perspectives. First, anti-intellectualism is seen as related to linguistic complexity as measured by certain textual features (e.g. sentence leng...
Main Author: | Marta Degani |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Department of Foreign Languages and Literatures at the University of Verona
2016-12-01
|
Series: | Iperstoria |
Online Access: | https://iperstoria.it/article/view/392 |
Similar Items
-
U.S. Foreign Policy in Clinton and Trump’s presidential campaign. Discourses on ISIS in the media
by: Isabel Rodríguez Toribio, et al.
Published: (2017-11-01) -
2016 Clinton’s and Trump’s US Presidential Campaign Texts: Adaptable Discourse for Global Political Players
by: Taofeek Olaiwola DALAMU
Published: (2020-08-01) -
“Let Me Tell You...”: Audience Engagement Strategies in the Campaign Speeches of Trump, Clinton, and Sanders
by: Justin Quam, et al.
Published: (2016-12-01) -
A Critical Discourse Analysis of the Race Segment of Clinton’s and Trumps’ first Presidential Debate
by: Karlsson, Sandra
Published: (2018) -
A Content Analysis of Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton's Campaign Speeches and Framing of the 2016 Presidential Election
by: Abdullah, Tawfiq O.
Published: (2019)