Take a stand on your decisions, or take a sit: posture does not affect risk preferences in an economic task
Physiological and emotional states can affect our decision-making processes, even when these states are seemingly insignificant to the decision at hand. We examined whether posture and postural threat affect decisions in a non-related economic domain. Healthy young adults made a series of choices be...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
PeerJ Inc.
2014-07-01
|
Series: | PeerJ |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://peerj.com/articles/475.pdf |
id |
doaj-f5b1b5a5f9eb4a6fa5e6a70a559d12b8 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-f5b1b5a5f9eb4a6fa5e6a70a559d12b82020-11-24T23:37:54ZengPeerJ Inc.PeerJ2167-83592014-07-012e47510.7717/peerj.475475Take a stand on your decisions, or take a sit: posture does not affect risk preferences in an economic taskMegan K. O’Brien0Alaa A. Ahmed1Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO, United StatesDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO, United StatesPhysiological and emotional states can affect our decision-making processes, even when these states are seemingly insignificant to the decision at hand. We examined whether posture and postural threat affect decisions in a non-related economic domain. Healthy young adults made a series of choices between economic lotteries in various conditions, including changes in body posture (sitting vs. standing) and changes in elevation (ground level vs. atop a 0.8-meter-high platform). We compared three metrics between conditions to assess changes in risk-sensitivity: frequency of risky choices, and parameter fits of both utility and probability weighting parameters using cumulative prospect theory. We also measured skin conductance level to evaluate physiological response to the postural threat. Our results demonstrate that body posture does not significantly affect decision making. Secondly, despite increased skin conductance level, economic risk-sensitivity was unaffected by increased threat. Our findings indicate that economic choices are fairly robust to the physiological and emotional changes that result from posture or postural threat.https://peerj.com/articles/475.pdfDecision-makingNeuroeconomicsEconomic lotteryRisk-sensitivityPostureThreat |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Megan K. O’Brien Alaa A. Ahmed |
spellingShingle |
Megan K. O’Brien Alaa A. Ahmed Take a stand on your decisions, or take a sit: posture does not affect risk preferences in an economic task PeerJ Decision-making Neuroeconomics Economic lottery Risk-sensitivity Posture Threat |
author_facet |
Megan K. O’Brien Alaa A. Ahmed |
author_sort |
Megan K. O’Brien |
title |
Take a stand on your decisions, or take a sit: posture does not affect risk preferences in an economic task |
title_short |
Take a stand on your decisions, or take a sit: posture does not affect risk preferences in an economic task |
title_full |
Take a stand on your decisions, or take a sit: posture does not affect risk preferences in an economic task |
title_fullStr |
Take a stand on your decisions, or take a sit: posture does not affect risk preferences in an economic task |
title_full_unstemmed |
Take a stand on your decisions, or take a sit: posture does not affect risk preferences in an economic task |
title_sort |
take a stand on your decisions, or take a sit: posture does not affect risk preferences in an economic task |
publisher |
PeerJ Inc. |
series |
PeerJ |
issn |
2167-8359 |
publishDate |
2014-07-01 |
description |
Physiological and emotional states can affect our decision-making processes, even when these states are seemingly insignificant to the decision at hand. We examined whether posture and postural threat affect decisions in a non-related economic domain. Healthy young adults made a series of choices between economic lotteries in various conditions, including changes in body posture (sitting vs. standing) and changes in elevation (ground level vs. atop a 0.8-meter-high platform). We compared three metrics between conditions to assess changes in risk-sensitivity: frequency of risky choices, and parameter fits of both utility and probability weighting parameters using cumulative prospect theory. We also measured skin conductance level to evaluate physiological response to the postural threat. Our results demonstrate that body posture does not significantly affect decision making. Secondly, despite increased skin conductance level, economic risk-sensitivity was unaffected by increased threat. Our findings indicate that economic choices are fairly robust to the physiological and emotional changes that result from posture or postural threat. |
topic |
Decision-making Neuroeconomics Economic lottery Risk-sensitivity Posture Threat |
url |
https://peerj.com/articles/475.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT megankobrien takeastandonyourdecisionsortakeasitposturedoesnotaffectriskpreferencesinaneconomictask AT alaaaahmed takeastandonyourdecisionsortakeasitposturedoesnotaffectriskpreferencesinaneconomictask |
_version_ |
1725518493250486272 |