Take a stand on your decisions, or take a sit: posture does not affect risk preferences in an economic task

Physiological and emotional states can affect our decision-making processes, even when these states are seemingly insignificant to the decision at hand. We examined whether posture and postural threat affect decisions in a non-related economic domain. Healthy young adults made a series of choices be...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Megan K. O’Brien, Alaa A. Ahmed
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: PeerJ Inc. 2014-07-01
Series:PeerJ
Subjects:
Online Access:https://peerj.com/articles/475.pdf
id doaj-f5b1b5a5f9eb4a6fa5e6a70a559d12b8
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f5b1b5a5f9eb4a6fa5e6a70a559d12b82020-11-24T23:37:54ZengPeerJ Inc.PeerJ2167-83592014-07-012e47510.7717/peerj.475475Take a stand on your decisions, or take a sit: posture does not affect risk preferences in an economic taskMegan K. O’Brien0Alaa A. Ahmed1Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO, United StatesDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO, United StatesPhysiological and emotional states can affect our decision-making processes, even when these states are seemingly insignificant to the decision at hand. We examined whether posture and postural threat affect decisions in a non-related economic domain. Healthy young adults made a series of choices between economic lotteries in various conditions, including changes in body posture (sitting vs. standing) and changes in elevation (ground level vs. atop a 0.8-meter-high platform). We compared three metrics between conditions to assess changes in risk-sensitivity: frequency of risky choices, and parameter fits of both utility and probability weighting parameters using cumulative prospect theory. We also measured skin conductance level to evaluate physiological response to the postural threat. Our results demonstrate that body posture does not significantly affect decision making. Secondly, despite increased skin conductance level, economic risk-sensitivity was unaffected by increased threat. Our findings indicate that economic choices are fairly robust to the physiological and emotional changes that result from posture or postural threat.https://peerj.com/articles/475.pdfDecision-makingNeuroeconomicsEconomic lotteryRisk-sensitivityPostureThreat
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Megan K. O’Brien
Alaa A. Ahmed
spellingShingle Megan K. O’Brien
Alaa A. Ahmed
Take a stand on your decisions, or take a sit: posture does not affect risk preferences in an economic task
PeerJ
Decision-making
Neuroeconomics
Economic lottery
Risk-sensitivity
Posture
Threat
author_facet Megan K. O’Brien
Alaa A. Ahmed
author_sort Megan K. O’Brien
title Take a stand on your decisions, or take a sit: posture does not affect risk preferences in an economic task
title_short Take a stand on your decisions, or take a sit: posture does not affect risk preferences in an economic task
title_full Take a stand on your decisions, or take a sit: posture does not affect risk preferences in an economic task
title_fullStr Take a stand on your decisions, or take a sit: posture does not affect risk preferences in an economic task
title_full_unstemmed Take a stand on your decisions, or take a sit: posture does not affect risk preferences in an economic task
title_sort take a stand on your decisions, or take a sit: posture does not affect risk preferences in an economic task
publisher PeerJ Inc.
series PeerJ
issn 2167-8359
publishDate 2014-07-01
description Physiological and emotional states can affect our decision-making processes, even when these states are seemingly insignificant to the decision at hand. We examined whether posture and postural threat affect decisions in a non-related economic domain. Healthy young adults made a series of choices between economic lotteries in various conditions, including changes in body posture (sitting vs. standing) and changes in elevation (ground level vs. atop a 0.8-meter-high platform). We compared three metrics between conditions to assess changes in risk-sensitivity: frequency of risky choices, and parameter fits of both utility and probability weighting parameters using cumulative prospect theory. We also measured skin conductance level to evaluate physiological response to the postural threat. Our results demonstrate that body posture does not significantly affect decision making. Secondly, despite increased skin conductance level, economic risk-sensitivity was unaffected by increased threat. Our findings indicate that economic choices are fairly robust to the physiological and emotional changes that result from posture or postural threat.
topic Decision-making
Neuroeconomics
Economic lottery
Risk-sensitivity
Posture
Threat
url https://peerj.com/articles/475.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT megankobrien takeastandonyourdecisionsortakeasitposturedoesnotaffectriskpreferencesinaneconomictask
AT alaaaahmed takeastandonyourdecisionsortakeasitposturedoesnotaffectriskpreferencesinaneconomictask
_version_ 1725518493250486272