Identifying Low Value Malnutrition Care Activities for De-Implementation and Systematised, Interdisciplinary Alternatives—A Multi-Site, Nominal Group Technique Approach

Malnutrition risk is identified in over one-third of inpatients; reliance on dietetics-delivered nutrition care for all “at-risk” patients is unsustainable, inefficient, and ineffective. This study aimed to identify and prioritise low-value malnutrition care activities for de-implementation and arti...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Alita Rushton, Kai Elmas, Judith Bauer, Jack J. Bell
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-06-01
Series:Nutrients
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/13/6/2063
id doaj-f5aeb277b0c6493e80ee77de170aeb02
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f5aeb277b0c6493e80ee77de170aeb022021-07-01T00:20:56ZengMDPI AGNutrients2072-66432021-06-01132063206310.3390/nu13062063Identifying Low Value Malnutrition Care Activities for De-Implementation and Systematised, Interdisciplinary Alternatives—A Multi-Site, Nominal Group Technique ApproachAlita Rushton0Kai Elmas1Judith Bauer2Jack J. Bell3Department of Nutrition & Dietetics, The Prince Charles Hospital, Chermside, QLD 4032, AustraliaDepartment of Nutrition & Dietetics, The Prince Charles Hospital, Chermside, QLD 4032, AustraliaSchool of Human Movement & Nutrition Sciences, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD 4067, AustraliaDepartment of Nutrition & Dietetics, The Prince Charles Hospital, Chermside, QLD 4032, AustraliaMalnutrition risk is identified in over one-third of inpatients; reliance on dietetics-delivered nutrition care for all “at-risk” patients is unsustainable, inefficient, and ineffective. This study aimed to identify and prioritise low-value malnutrition care activities for de-implementation and articulate systematised interdisciplinary opportunities. Nine workshops, at eight purposively sampled hospitals, were undertaken using the nominal group technique. Participants were asked “What highly individualised malnutrition care activities do you think we could replace with systematised, interdisciplinary malnutrition care?” and “What systematised, interdisciplinary opportunities do you think we should do to provide more effective and efficient nutrition care in our ward/hospital?” Sixty-three participants were provided five votes per question. The most voted de-implementation activities were low-value nutrition reviews (32); education by dietitian (28); assessments by dietitian for patients with malnutrition screening tool score of two (22); assistants duplicating malnutrition screening (19); and comprehensive, individualised nutrition assessments where unlikely to add value (15). The top voted alternative opportunities were delegated/skill shared interventions (55), delegated/skill shared education (24), abbreviated malnutrition care processes where clinically appropriate (23), delegated/skill shared supportive food/fluids (14), and mealtime assistance (13). Findings highlight opportunities to de-implement perceived low-value malnutrition care activities and replace them with systems and skill shared alternatives across hospital settings.https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/13/6/2063assistantsclinical governancede-implementationdelegationdelivery of health careimplementation science
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Alita Rushton
Kai Elmas
Judith Bauer
Jack J. Bell
spellingShingle Alita Rushton
Kai Elmas
Judith Bauer
Jack J. Bell
Identifying Low Value Malnutrition Care Activities for De-Implementation and Systematised, Interdisciplinary Alternatives—A Multi-Site, Nominal Group Technique Approach
Nutrients
assistants
clinical governance
de-implementation
delegation
delivery of health care
implementation science
author_facet Alita Rushton
Kai Elmas
Judith Bauer
Jack J. Bell
author_sort Alita Rushton
title Identifying Low Value Malnutrition Care Activities for De-Implementation and Systematised, Interdisciplinary Alternatives—A Multi-Site, Nominal Group Technique Approach
title_short Identifying Low Value Malnutrition Care Activities for De-Implementation and Systematised, Interdisciplinary Alternatives—A Multi-Site, Nominal Group Technique Approach
title_full Identifying Low Value Malnutrition Care Activities for De-Implementation and Systematised, Interdisciplinary Alternatives—A Multi-Site, Nominal Group Technique Approach
title_fullStr Identifying Low Value Malnutrition Care Activities for De-Implementation and Systematised, Interdisciplinary Alternatives—A Multi-Site, Nominal Group Technique Approach
title_full_unstemmed Identifying Low Value Malnutrition Care Activities for De-Implementation and Systematised, Interdisciplinary Alternatives—A Multi-Site, Nominal Group Technique Approach
title_sort identifying low value malnutrition care activities for de-implementation and systematised, interdisciplinary alternatives—a multi-site, nominal group technique approach
publisher MDPI AG
series Nutrients
issn 2072-6643
publishDate 2021-06-01
description Malnutrition risk is identified in over one-third of inpatients; reliance on dietetics-delivered nutrition care for all “at-risk” patients is unsustainable, inefficient, and ineffective. This study aimed to identify and prioritise low-value malnutrition care activities for de-implementation and articulate systematised interdisciplinary opportunities. Nine workshops, at eight purposively sampled hospitals, were undertaken using the nominal group technique. Participants were asked “What highly individualised malnutrition care activities do you think we could replace with systematised, interdisciplinary malnutrition care?” and “What systematised, interdisciplinary opportunities do you think we should do to provide more effective and efficient nutrition care in our ward/hospital?” Sixty-three participants were provided five votes per question. The most voted de-implementation activities were low-value nutrition reviews (32); education by dietitian (28); assessments by dietitian for patients with malnutrition screening tool score of two (22); assistants duplicating malnutrition screening (19); and comprehensive, individualised nutrition assessments where unlikely to add value (15). The top voted alternative opportunities were delegated/skill shared interventions (55), delegated/skill shared education (24), abbreviated malnutrition care processes where clinically appropriate (23), delegated/skill shared supportive food/fluids (14), and mealtime assistance (13). Findings highlight opportunities to de-implement perceived low-value malnutrition care activities and replace them with systems and skill shared alternatives across hospital settings.
topic assistants
clinical governance
de-implementation
delegation
delivery of health care
implementation science
url https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/13/6/2063
work_keys_str_mv AT alitarushton identifyinglowvaluemalnutritioncareactivitiesfordeimplementationandsystematisedinterdisciplinaryalternativesamultisitenominalgrouptechniqueapproach
AT kaielmas identifyinglowvaluemalnutritioncareactivitiesfordeimplementationandsystematisedinterdisciplinaryalternativesamultisitenominalgrouptechniqueapproach
AT judithbauer identifyinglowvaluemalnutritioncareactivitiesfordeimplementationandsystematisedinterdisciplinaryalternativesamultisitenominalgrouptechniqueapproach
AT jackjbell identifyinglowvaluemalnutritioncareactivitiesfordeimplementationandsystematisedinterdisciplinaryalternativesamultisitenominalgrouptechniqueapproach
_version_ 1721348922296762368