The (no) regulation of disinformation in the European Union. A comparative perspective.

The aim of this study is to carry out a comparative analysis around the different measures undertaken by the countries of the European Union to fight against misinformation. From this perspective, we analyze the measures undertaken by the EU in the new scenario and we study the concrete actions take...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Raúl Magallón Rosa
Format: Article
Language:Spanish
Published: Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia 2019-12-01
Series:Revista de Derecho Político
Subjects:
Online Access:http://revistas.uned.es/index.php/derechopolitico/article/view/26159
id doaj-f5a79a78290f45a59c0bdada20afc6a2
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f5a79a78290f45a59c0bdada20afc6a22020-11-25T03:44:10ZspaUniversidad Nacional de Educación a DistanciaRevista de Derecho Político0211-979X2174-56252019-12-01110631934610.5944/rdp.106.2019.2615919178The (no) regulation of disinformation in the European Union. A comparative perspective.Raúl Magallón Rosa0Universidad Carlos III de MadridThe aim of this study is to carry out a comparative analysis around the different measures undertaken by the countries of the European Union to fight against misinformation. From this perspective, we analyze the measures undertaken by the EU in the new scenario and we study the concrete actions taken by the different countries that have decided to act in the fight against fake news and disinformation. The study focuses mainly on four countries: Germany, France, Spain and the United Kingdom. The work aims to distinguish between legislative measures, digital literacy, reports, working groups, etc. as well as between internal and external measures. It means, those aimed at monitoring the propaganda and interference activities of third countries in the electoral processes. In any of these scenarios, digital legislation presents challenges that are repeated: a legislative model not adapted to digital changes, interests of traditional actors who don´t want to lose their market shares and power and the unawareness of a new phenomena that quickly has been installed in our daily life. Summary: 1. INTRODUCTION. EUROPE’S DIFFERENT SPEEDS VERSUS FAKE NEWS. 2. DISINFORMATION AND FAKE NEWS. THE STATE OF THE MATTER. 3. EUROPE IN THE FACE OF DISINFORMATION. EVERY CHOICE IS A NEW CHALLENGE. 4. THE REGULATION OF DISINFORMATION IN THE DIFFERENT EU COUNTRIES. 5. HOW TO COMBAT DISINFORMATION. CONCLUSIONS AND PERSPECTIVES FOR THE FUTURE. 6. CONCLUSIONS.http://revistas.uned.es/index.php/derechopolitico/article/view/26159fake news, elecciones, regulación, desinformación, unión europea.
collection DOAJ
language Spanish
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Raúl Magallón Rosa
spellingShingle Raúl Magallón Rosa
The (no) regulation of disinformation in the European Union. A comparative perspective.
Revista de Derecho Político
fake news, elecciones, regulación, desinformación, unión europea.
author_facet Raúl Magallón Rosa
author_sort Raúl Magallón Rosa
title The (no) regulation of disinformation in the European Union. A comparative perspective.
title_short The (no) regulation of disinformation in the European Union. A comparative perspective.
title_full The (no) regulation of disinformation in the European Union. A comparative perspective.
title_fullStr The (no) regulation of disinformation in the European Union. A comparative perspective.
title_full_unstemmed The (no) regulation of disinformation in the European Union. A comparative perspective.
title_sort (no) regulation of disinformation in the european union. a comparative perspective.
publisher Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia
series Revista de Derecho Político
issn 0211-979X
2174-5625
publishDate 2019-12-01
description The aim of this study is to carry out a comparative analysis around the different measures undertaken by the countries of the European Union to fight against misinformation. From this perspective, we analyze the measures undertaken by the EU in the new scenario and we study the concrete actions taken by the different countries that have decided to act in the fight against fake news and disinformation. The study focuses mainly on four countries: Germany, France, Spain and the United Kingdom. The work aims to distinguish between legislative measures, digital literacy, reports, working groups, etc. as well as between internal and external measures. It means, those aimed at monitoring the propaganda and interference activities of third countries in the electoral processes. In any of these scenarios, digital legislation presents challenges that are repeated: a legislative model not adapted to digital changes, interests of traditional actors who don´t want to lose their market shares and power and the unawareness of a new phenomena that quickly has been installed in our daily life. Summary: 1. INTRODUCTION. EUROPE’S DIFFERENT SPEEDS VERSUS FAKE NEWS. 2. DISINFORMATION AND FAKE NEWS. THE STATE OF THE MATTER. 3. EUROPE IN THE FACE OF DISINFORMATION. EVERY CHOICE IS A NEW CHALLENGE. 4. THE REGULATION OF DISINFORMATION IN THE DIFFERENT EU COUNTRIES. 5. HOW TO COMBAT DISINFORMATION. CONCLUSIONS AND PERSPECTIVES FOR THE FUTURE. 6. CONCLUSIONS.
topic fake news, elecciones, regulación, desinformación, unión europea.
url http://revistas.uned.es/index.php/derechopolitico/article/view/26159
work_keys_str_mv AT raulmagallonrosa thenoregulationofdisinformationintheeuropeanunionacomparativeperspective
AT raulmagallonrosa noregulationofdisinformationintheeuropeanunionacomparativeperspective
_version_ 1724515782605406208