The (no) regulation of disinformation in the European Union. A comparative perspective.
The aim of this study is to carry out a comparative analysis around the different measures undertaken by the countries of the European Union to fight against misinformation. From this perspective, we analyze the measures undertaken by the EU in the new scenario and we study the concrete actions take...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | Spanish |
Published: |
Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia
2019-12-01
|
Series: | Revista de Derecho Político |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://revistas.uned.es/index.php/derechopolitico/article/view/26159 |
id |
doaj-f5a79a78290f45a59c0bdada20afc6a2 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-f5a79a78290f45a59c0bdada20afc6a22020-11-25T03:44:10ZspaUniversidad Nacional de Educación a DistanciaRevista de Derecho Político0211-979X2174-56252019-12-01110631934610.5944/rdp.106.2019.2615919178The (no) regulation of disinformation in the European Union. A comparative perspective.Raúl Magallón Rosa0Universidad Carlos III de MadridThe aim of this study is to carry out a comparative analysis around the different measures undertaken by the countries of the European Union to fight against misinformation. From this perspective, we analyze the measures undertaken by the EU in the new scenario and we study the concrete actions taken by the different countries that have decided to act in the fight against fake news and disinformation. The study focuses mainly on four countries: Germany, France, Spain and the United Kingdom. The work aims to distinguish between legislative measures, digital literacy, reports, working groups, etc. as well as between internal and external measures. It means, those aimed at monitoring the propaganda and interference activities of third countries in the electoral processes. In any of these scenarios, digital legislation presents challenges that are repeated: a legislative model not adapted to digital changes, interests of traditional actors who don´t want to lose their market shares and power and the unawareness of a new phenomena that quickly has been installed in our daily life. Summary: 1. INTRODUCTION. EUROPE’S DIFFERENT SPEEDS VERSUS FAKE NEWS. 2. DISINFORMATION AND FAKE NEWS. THE STATE OF THE MATTER. 3. EUROPE IN THE FACE OF DISINFORMATION. EVERY CHOICE IS A NEW CHALLENGE. 4. THE REGULATION OF DISINFORMATION IN THE DIFFERENT EU COUNTRIES. 5. HOW TO COMBAT DISINFORMATION. CONCLUSIONS AND PERSPECTIVES FOR THE FUTURE. 6. CONCLUSIONS.http://revistas.uned.es/index.php/derechopolitico/article/view/26159fake news, elecciones, regulación, desinformación, unión europea. |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
Spanish |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Raúl Magallón Rosa |
spellingShingle |
Raúl Magallón Rosa The (no) regulation of disinformation in the European Union. A comparative perspective. Revista de Derecho Político fake news, elecciones, regulación, desinformación, unión europea. |
author_facet |
Raúl Magallón Rosa |
author_sort |
Raúl Magallón Rosa |
title |
The (no) regulation of disinformation in the European Union. A comparative perspective. |
title_short |
The (no) regulation of disinformation in the European Union. A comparative perspective. |
title_full |
The (no) regulation of disinformation in the European Union. A comparative perspective. |
title_fullStr |
The (no) regulation of disinformation in the European Union. A comparative perspective. |
title_full_unstemmed |
The (no) regulation of disinformation in the European Union. A comparative perspective. |
title_sort |
(no) regulation of disinformation in the european union. a comparative perspective. |
publisher |
Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia |
series |
Revista de Derecho Político |
issn |
0211-979X 2174-5625 |
publishDate |
2019-12-01 |
description |
The aim of this study is to carry out a comparative analysis around the different measures undertaken by the countries of the European Union to fight against misinformation. From this perspective, we analyze the measures undertaken by the EU in the new scenario and we study the concrete actions taken by the different countries that have decided to act in the fight against fake news and disinformation.
The study focuses mainly on four countries: Germany, France, Spain and the United Kingdom. The work aims to distinguish between legislative measures, digital literacy, reports, working groups, etc. as well as between internal and external measures. It means, those aimed at monitoring the propaganda and interference activities of third countries in the electoral processes. In any of these scenarios, digital legislation presents challenges that are repeated: a legislative model not adapted to digital changes, interests of traditional actors who don´t want to lose their market shares and power and the unawareness of a new phenomena that quickly has been installed in our daily life.
Summary:
1. INTRODUCTION. EUROPE’S DIFFERENT SPEEDS VERSUS FAKE NEWS. 2. DISINFORMATION AND FAKE NEWS. THE STATE OF THE MATTER. 3. EUROPE IN THE FACE OF DISINFORMATION. EVERY CHOICE IS A NEW CHALLENGE. 4. THE REGULATION OF DISINFORMATION IN THE DIFFERENT EU COUNTRIES. 5. HOW TO COMBAT DISINFORMATION. CONCLUSIONS AND PERSPECTIVES FOR THE FUTURE. 6. CONCLUSIONS. |
topic |
fake news, elecciones, regulación, desinformación, unión europea. |
url |
http://revistas.uned.es/index.php/derechopolitico/article/view/26159 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT raulmagallonrosa thenoregulationofdisinformationintheeuropeanunionacomparativeperspective AT raulmagallonrosa noregulationofdisinformationintheeuropeanunionacomparativeperspective |
_version_ |
1724515782605406208 |