The effectiveness of the use of xenogeneic bone blocks mixed with autologous Concentrated Growth Factors (CGF) in bone regeneration techniques: a case series

Aim: Different types of biomaterials and surgical techniques are currently used for the augmentation of atrophic ridges in view of implant supported restorations. The aim of this study was to clinically and histologically evaluate the combination of Concentrated Growth Factors (CGF) and xenogeneic b...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: E. Gheno, A. Palermo, L.F. Rodella, B. Buffoli
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Ariesdue 2014-06-01
Series:Journal of Osseointegration
Subjects:
CGF
Online Access:http://www.journalofosseointegration.eu/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/JOsseointegr.2014.2.3.pdf
id doaj-f5a15edeb85c4bbb9d7bd2dbefe4b75a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f5a15edeb85c4bbb9d7bd2dbefe4b75a2020-11-25T03:31:46ZengAriesdueJournal of Osseointegration2036-413X2036-41212014-06-01623742The effectiveness of the use of xenogeneic bone blocks mixed with autologous Concentrated Growth Factors (CGF) in bone regeneration techniques: a case seriesE. Gheno0A. Palermo1L.F. Rodella2B. Buffoli3Private practitioner in Somma Lombardo (Va), ItalyPrivate practitioner in Lecce, ItalySection of Anatomy and Physiopathology, Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, ItalySection of Anatomy and Physiopathology, Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, ItalyAim: Different types of biomaterials and surgical techniques are currently used for the augmentation of atrophic ridges in view of implant supported restorations. The aim of this study was to clinically and histologically evaluate the combination of Concentrated Growth Factors (CGF) and xenogeneic bone in vertical and/or horizontal ridge augmentation. Materials and methods: Seven patients (3 males and 4 females), who required oral implant and ridge augmentation surgery, were selected: 3 implants were placed during the surgery and 4 implants were inserted 4 months later, in order to allow complete graft integration. All implants were loaded after a 4-month healing time. The following parameters were assessed: a) the capability of CGF to permeate the bone scaffold; b) the degree of bone regeneration; c) the clinical success rate. Results: The results obtained showed that: a) with the used medical device porous bone scaffolds can be effectively permeated by the CGF; b) the permeated grafting material resulted in effective bone regeneration, as confirmed by histomorphometric analysis; c) all implants were successfully in function at the 12 months follow-up. Conclusion: This technique can be safely performed in the dental office under local anesthesia, so it can be considered a viable option in bone regeneration surgery.http://www.journalofosseointegration.eu/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/JOsseointegr.2014.2.3.pdfBone regenerationCGFHorizontal ridge augmentationScaffold blocksVertical ridge augmentation
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author E. Gheno
A. Palermo
L.F. Rodella
B. Buffoli
spellingShingle E. Gheno
A. Palermo
L.F. Rodella
B. Buffoli
The effectiveness of the use of xenogeneic bone blocks mixed with autologous Concentrated Growth Factors (CGF) in bone regeneration techniques: a case series
Journal of Osseointegration
Bone regeneration
CGF
Horizontal ridge augmentation
Scaffold blocks
Vertical ridge augmentation
author_facet E. Gheno
A. Palermo
L.F. Rodella
B. Buffoli
author_sort E. Gheno
title The effectiveness of the use of xenogeneic bone blocks mixed with autologous Concentrated Growth Factors (CGF) in bone regeneration techniques: a case series
title_short The effectiveness of the use of xenogeneic bone blocks mixed with autologous Concentrated Growth Factors (CGF) in bone regeneration techniques: a case series
title_full The effectiveness of the use of xenogeneic bone blocks mixed with autologous Concentrated Growth Factors (CGF) in bone regeneration techniques: a case series
title_fullStr The effectiveness of the use of xenogeneic bone blocks mixed with autologous Concentrated Growth Factors (CGF) in bone regeneration techniques: a case series
title_full_unstemmed The effectiveness of the use of xenogeneic bone blocks mixed with autologous Concentrated Growth Factors (CGF) in bone regeneration techniques: a case series
title_sort effectiveness of the use of xenogeneic bone blocks mixed with autologous concentrated growth factors (cgf) in bone regeneration techniques: a case series
publisher Ariesdue
series Journal of Osseointegration
issn 2036-413X
2036-4121
publishDate 2014-06-01
description Aim: Different types of biomaterials and surgical techniques are currently used for the augmentation of atrophic ridges in view of implant supported restorations. The aim of this study was to clinically and histologically evaluate the combination of Concentrated Growth Factors (CGF) and xenogeneic bone in vertical and/or horizontal ridge augmentation. Materials and methods: Seven patients (3 males and 4 females), who required oral implant and ridge augmentation surgery, were selected: 3 implants were placed during the surgery and 4 implants were inserted 4 months later, in order to allow complete graft integration. All implants were loaded after a 4-month healing time. The following parameters were assessed: a) the capability of CGF to permeate the bone scaffold; b) the degree of bone regeneration; c) the clinical success rate. Results: The results obtained showed that: a) with the used medical device porous bone scaffolds can be effectively permeated by the CGF; b) the permeated grafting material resulted in effective bone regeneration, as confirmed by histomorphometric analysis; c) all implants were successfully in function at the 12 months follow-up. Conclusion: This technique can be safely performed in the dental office under local anesthesia, so it can be considered a viable option in bone regeneration surgery.
topic Bone regeneration
CGF
Horizontal ridge augmentation
Scaffold blocks
Vertical ridge augmentation
url http://www.journalofosseointegration.eu/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/JOsseointegr.2014.2.3.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT egheno theeffectivenessoftheuseofxenogeneicboneblocksmixedwithautologousconcentratedgrowthfactorscgfinboneregenerationtechniquesacaseseries
AT apalermo theeffectivenessoftheuseofxenogeneicboneblocksmixedwithautologousconcentratedgrowthfactorscgfinboneregenerationtechniquesacaseseries
AT lfrodella theeffectivenessoftheuseofxenogeneicboneblocksmixedwithautologousconcentratedgrowthfactorscgfinboneregenerationtechniquesacaseseries
AT bbuffoli theeffectivenessoftheuseofxenogeneicboneblocksmixedwithautologousconcentratedgrowthfactorscgfinboneregenerationtechniquesacaseseries
AT egheno effectivenessoftheuseofxenogeneicboneblocksmixedwithautologousconcentratedgrowthfactorscgfinboneregenerationtechniquesacaseseries
AT apalermo effectivenessoftheuseofxenogeneicboneblocksmixedwithautologousconcentratedgrowthfactorscgfinboneregenerationtechniquesacaseseries
AT lfrodella effectivenessoftheuseofxenogeneicboneblocksmixedwithautologousconcentratedgrowthfactorscgfinboneregenerationtechniquesacaseseries
AT bbuffoli effectivenessoftheuseofxenogeneicboneblocksmixedwithautologousconcentratedgrowthfactorscgfinboneregenerationtechniquesacaseseries
_version_ 1724571837013164032