Between ballots and bullets: Executive competitiveness and civil war incidence, 1976-2000

Although recent research has yielded some determining elements to civil war, the influence of politicalfactors on internal conflicts remains disputed. This article presents a critical review of the mostwidely used indices of democracy in civil war studies, and suggests that the competitiveness ofthe...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Danilo Freire
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Asociación Española de Ciencia Política y de la Administración (AECPA) 2014-11-01
Series:Revista Española de Ciencia Política
Subjects:
Online Access:https://recyt.fecyt.es/index.php/recp/article/view/37638
id doaj-f59c0ddebf5b4844b9301ee9dd1f3837
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f59c0ddebf5b4844b9301ee9dd1f38372020-11-25T00:34:54ZengAsociación Española de Ciencia Política y de la Administración (AECPA) Revista Española de Ciencia Política1575-65482173-98702014-11-01036356221925Between ballots and bullets: Executive competitiveness and civil war incidence, 1976-2000Danilo Freire0King’s College LondonAlthough recent research has yielded some determining elements to civil war, the influence of politicalfactors on internal conflicts remains disputed. This article presents a critical review of the mostwidely used indices of democracy in civil war studies, and suggests that the competitiveness ofthe executive power can be a useful measure for quantitative conflict research. The paper alsoanalyses, by means of statistical regression, the relationship between the competitiveness in theexecutive recruitment and civil war incidence from 1976 to 2000. The findings indicate that bothsingle-candidate and multi-party elections reduce the incidence of civil war. Furthermore, theresults lend support to the hypotheses put forward by recent literature that ethnic fractionalisation,mountainous terrain, large population and centralised political systems significantly heighten therisk of incidence of civil war, while high GDP per capita and economic growth decrease the likelihoodof internal conflicts.https://recyt.fecyt.es/index.php/recp/article/view/37638civil warselectionsexecutive branchpolitical regimespolitical violence
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Danilo Freire
spellingShingle Danilo Freire
Between ballots and bullets: Executive competitiveness and civil war incidence, 1976-2000
Revista Española de Ciencia Política
civil wars
elections
executive branch
political regimes
political violence
author_facet Danilo Freire
author_sort Danilo Freire
title Between ballots and bullets: Executive competitiveness and civil war incidence, 1976-2000
title_short Between ballots and bullets: Executive competitiveness and civil war incidence, 1976-2000
title_full Between ballots and bullets: Executive competitiveness and civil war incidence, 1976-2000
title_fullStr Between ballots and bullets: Executive competitiveness and civil war incidence, 1976-2000
title_full_unstemmed Between ballots and bullets: Executive competitiveness and civil war incidence, 1976-2000
title_sort between ballots and bullets: executive competitiveness and civil war incidence, 1976-2000
publisher Asociación Española de Ciencia Política y de la Administración (AECPA)
series Revista Española de Ciencia Política
issn 1575-6548
2173-9870
publishDate 2014-11-01
description Although recent research has yielded some determining elements to civil war, the influence of politicalfactors on internal conflicts remains disputed. This article presents a critical review of the mostwidely used indices of democracy in civil war studies, and suggests that the competitiveness ofthe executive power can be a useful measure for quantitative conflict research. The paper alsoanalyses, by means of statistical regression, the relationship between the competitiveness in theexecutive recruitment and civil war incidence from 1976 to 2000. The findings indicate that bothsingle-candidate and multi-party elections reduce the incidence of civil war. Furthermore, theresults lend support to the hypotheses put forward by recent literature that ethnic fractionalisation,mountainous terrain, large population and centralised political systems significantly heighten therisk of incidence of civil war, while high GDP per capita and economic growth decrease the likelihoodof internal conflicts.
topic civil wars
elections
executive branch
political regimes
political violence
url https://recyt.fecyt.es/index.php/recp/article/view/37638
work_keys_str_mv AT danilofreire betweenballotsandbulletsexecutivecompetitivenessandcivilwarincidence19762000
_version_ 1725311490918973440