Assessing iMET-XQ Performance and Optimal Placement on a Small Off-the-Shelf, Rotary-Wing UAV, as a Function of Atmospheric Conditions

The accuracy and precision of iMET-XQ (InterMET Inc., Grand Rapids, MI, USA) temperature measurements in ten different locations on an off-the shelf rotary-wing unmanned aerial vehicle (rw-UAV) were assessed, as a function of atmospheric conditions. The rw-UAV hovered near an instrumented South Alab...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sytske K. Kimball, Carlos J. Montalvo, Madhuri S. Mulekar
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-06-01
Series:Atmosphere
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4433/11/6/660
id doaj-f568af43e2314709b1ac0cb351717179
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f568af43e2314709b1ac0cb3517171792020-11-25T02:28:12ZengMDPI AGAtmosphere2073-44332020-06-011166066010.3390/atmos11060660Assessing iMET-XQ Performance and Optimal Placement on a Small Off-the-Shelf, Rotary-Wing UAV, as a Function of Atmospheric ConditionsSytske K. Kimball0Carlos J. Montalvo1Madhuri S. Mulekar2Department of Earth Sciences, University of South Alabama, 5871 USA North Drive, Mobile, AL 36688, USADepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of South Alabama, 150 Student Services Drive, Mobile, AL 36688, USADepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, University of South Alabama, 411 University Blvd North, Mobile, AL 36688, USAThe accuracy and precision of iMET-XQ (InterMET Inc., Grand Rapids, MI, USA) temperature measurements in ten different locations on an off-the shelf rotary-wing unmanned aerial vehicle (rw-UAV) were assessed, as a function of atmospheric conditions. The rw-UAV hovered near an instrumented South Alabama Mesonet tower. The mean ± standard deviation of all the temperature differences between the tower and the ten iMET-XQ sensors for all experiments are −0.23 °C ±0.24 °C. Both the UAV and the environment influence the accuracy and precision of the iMET-XQ temperature measurements. Heat generated by the electronic components within the UAV body has a significant influence on the iMET-XQ temperature measurements, regardless of solar radiation conditions, and is highly dependent on wind direction. Electronic components within the UAV body heat up and can cause sensors downwind from the UAV body to record temperatures that are too warm, even if the sensors are aspirated by propeller wash. iMET-XQ sensors placed on rotor arms not near UAV body heat sources, and properly aspirated by propeller wash, perform well. Measurements from iMET-XQ sensors suspended below the UAV are also accurate. When using an off-the-shelf UAV for atmospheric temperature sensing, the electronic components inside the body of the UAV must be properly located. It is recommended that multiple sensors are placed on the UAV. Sensor redundancy will mitigate data loss in case of malfunction during flight and the identification of poorly performing sensors.https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4433/11/6/660temperature observationssensor validationsensor placement
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sytske K. Kimball
Carlos J. Montalvo
Madhuri S. Mulekar
spellingShingle Sytske K. Kimball
Carlos J. Montalvo
Madhuri S. Mulekar
Assessing iMET-XQ Performance and Optimal Placement on a Small Off-the-Shelf, Rotary-Wing UAV, as a Function of Atmospheric Conditions
Atmosphere
temperature observations
sensor validation
sensor placement
author_facet Sytske K. Kimball
Carlos J. Montalvo
Madhuri S. Mulekar
author_sort Sytske K. Kimball
title Assessing iMET-XQ Performance and Optimal Placement on a Small Off-the-Shelf, Rotary-Wing UAV, as a Function of Atmospheric Conditions
title_short Assessing iMET-XQ Performance and Optimal Placement on a Small Off-the-Shelf, Rotary-Wing UAV, as a Function of Atmospheric Conditions
title_full Assessing iMET-XQ Performance and Optimal Placement on a Small Off-the-Shelf, Rotary-Wing UAV, as a Function of Atmospheric Conditions
title_fullStr Assessing iMET-XQ Performance and Optimal Placement on a Small Off-the-Shelf, Rotary-Wing UAV, as a Function of Atmospheric Conditions
title_full_unstemmed Assessing iMET-XQ Performance and Optimal Placement on a Small Off-the-Shelf, Rotary-Wing UAV, as a Function of Atmospheric Conditions
title_sort assessing imet-xq performance and optimal placement on a small off-the-shelf, rotary-wing uav, as a function of atmospheric conditions
publisher MDPI AG
series Atmosphere
issn 2073-4433
publishDate 2020-06-01
description The accuracy and precision of iMET-XQ (InterMET Inc., Grand Rapids, MI, USA) temperature measurements in ten different locations on an off-the shelf rotary-wing unmanned aerial vehicle (rw-UAV) were assessed, as a function of atmospheric conditions. The rw-UAV hovered near an instrumented South Alabama Mesonet tower. The mean ± standard deviation of all the temperature differences between the tower and the ten iMET-XQ sensors for all experiments are −0.23 °C ±0.24 °C. Both the UAV and the environment influence the accuracy and precision of the iMET-XQ temperature measurements. Heat generated by the electronic components within the UAV body has a significant influence on the iMET-XQ temperature measurements, regardless of solar radiation conditions, and is highly dependent on wind direction. Electronic components within the UAV body heat up and can cause sensors downwind from the UAV body to record temperatures that are too warm, even if the sensors are aspirated by propeller wash. iMET-XQ sensors placed on rotor arms not near UAV body heat sources, and properly aspirated by propeller wash, perform well. Measurements from iMET-XQ sensors suspended below the UAV are also accurate. When using an off-the-shelf UAV for atmospheric temperature sensing, the electronic components inside the body of the UAV must be properly located. It is recommended that multiple sensors are placed on the UAV. Sensor redundancy will mitigate data loss in case of malfunction during flight and the identification of poorly performing sensors.
topic temperature observations
sensor validation
sensor placement
url https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4433/11/6/660
work_keys_str_mv AT sytskekkimball assessingimetxqperformanceandoptimalplacementonasmallofftheshelfrotarywinguavasafunctionofatmosphericconditions
AT carlosjmontalvo assessingimetxqperformanceandoptimalplacementonasmallofftheshelfrotarywinguavasafunctionofatmosphericconditions
AT madhurismulekar assessingimetxqperformanceandoptimalplacementonasmallofftheshelfrotarywinguavasafunctionofatmosphericconditions
_version_ 1724839748942430208