Individual Cerebral Blood Flow Responses to Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation at Various Intensities

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has been shown to alter cortical excitability. However, it is increasingly accepted that tDCS has high inter- and intra-subject response variability, which currently limits broad application and has prompted some to doubt if the current can reach the br...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Craig D. Workman, Alexandra C. Fietsam, Laura L. Boles Ponto, John Kamholz, Thorsten Rudroff
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-11-01
Series:Brain Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3425/10/11/855
id doaj-f5605d18a8d147b4a05cc0a8d760e079
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f5605d18a8d147b4a05cc0a8d760e0792020-11-25T04:03:32ZengMDPI AGBrain Sciences2076-34252020-11-011085585510.3390/brainsci10110855Individual Cerebral Blood Flow Responses to Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation at Various IntensitiesCraig D. Workman0Alexandra C. Fietsam1Laura L. Boles Ponto2John Kamholz3Thorsten Rudroff4Department of Health and Human Physiology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USADepartment of Health and Human Physiology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USADepartment of Radiology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA 52242, USADepartment of Neurology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA 52242, USADepartment of Health and Human Physiology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USATranscranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has been shown to alter cortical excitability. However, it is increasingly accepted that tDCS has high inter- and intra-subject response variability, which currently limits broad application and has prompted some to doubt if the current can reach the brain. This study reports individual cerebral blood flow responses in people with multiple sclerosis and neurologically healthy subjects that experienced 5 min of anodal tDCS at 1 mA, 2 mA, 3 mA, and 4 mA over either the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) or the primary motor cortex (M1). The most notable results indicated anticipated changes in regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) in two regions of one DLPFC subject (2 mA condition), and expected changes in one M1 subject in the 2 mA and 4 mA conditions and in another M1 subject in the 2 mA condition. There were also changes contrary to the expected direction in one DLPFC subject and in two M1 subjects. These data suggest the effects of tDCS might be site-specific and highlight the high variability and individualized responses increasingly reported in tDCS literature. Future studies should use longer stimulation durations and image at various time points after stimulation cessation when exploring the effects of tDCS on cerebral blood flow (CBF).https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3425/10/11/855tDCSneuroimagingpositron emission tomographycerebral blood flowmultiple sclerosis
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Craig D. Workman
Alexandra C. Fietsam
Laura L. Boles Ponto
John Kamholz
Thorsten Rudroff
spellingShingle Craig D. Workman
Alexandra C. Fietsam
Laura L. Boles Ponto
John Kamholz
Thorsten Rudroff
Individual Cerebral Blood Flow Responses to Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation at Various Intensities
Brain Sciences
tDCS
neuroimaging
positron emission tomography
cerebral blood flow
multiple sclerosis
author_facet Craig D. Workman
Alexandra C. Fietsam
Laura L. Boles Ponto
John Kamholz
Thorsten Rudroff
author_sort Craig D. Workman
title Individual Cerebral Blood Flow Responses to Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation at Various Intensities
title_short Individual Cerebral Blood Flow Responses to Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation at Various Intensities
title_full Individual Cerebral Blood Flow Responses to Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation at Various Intensities
title_fullStr Individual Cerebral Blood Flow Responses to Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation at Various Intensities
title_full_unstemmed Individual Cerebral Blood Flow Responses to Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation at Various Intensities
title_sort individual cerebral blood flow responses to transcranial direct current stimulation at various intensities
publisher MDPI AG
series Brain Sciences
issn 2076-3425
publishDate 2020-11-01
description Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has been shown to alter cortical excitability. However, it is increasingly accepted that tDCS has high inter- and intra-subject response variability, which currently limits broad application and has prompted some to doubt if the current can reach the brain. This study reports individual cerebral blood flow responses in people with multiple sclerosis and neurologically healthy subjects that experienced 5 min of anodal tDCS at 1 mA, 2 mA, 3 mA, and 4 mA over either the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) or the primary motor cortex (M1). The most notable results indicated anticipated changes in regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) in two regions of one DLPFC subject (2 mA condition), and expected changes in one M1 subject in the 2 mA and 4 mA conditions and in another M1 subject in the 2 mA condition. There were also changes contrary to the expected direction in one DLPFC subject and in two M1 subjects. These data suggest the effects of tDCS might be site-specific and highlight the high variability and individualized responses increasingly reported in tDCS literature. Future studies should use longer stimulation durations and image at various time points after stimulation cessation when exploring the effects of tDCS on cerebral blood flow (CBF).
topic tDCS
neuroimaging
positron emission tomography
cerebral blood flow
multiple sclerosis
url https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3425/10/11/855
work_keys_str_mv AT craigdworkman individualcerebralbloodflowresponsestotranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationatvariousintensities
AT alexandracfietsam individualcerebralbloodflowresponsestotranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationatvariousintensities
AT lauralbolesponto individualcerebralbloodflowresponsestotranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationatvariousintensities
AT johnkamholz individualcerebralbloodflowresponsestotranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationatvariousintensities
AT thorstenrudroff individualcerebralbloodflowresponsestotranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationatvariousintensities
_version_ 1724439826432786432