The High Court of Australie : A Federal Supreme Court in a Common Law Federation

The High Court of Australia performs several judicial functions that are fundamental to the federal system1. It determines appeals from all state supreme courts and inferior federal courts and it has original jurisdiction in several kinds of matters, including those involving the interpretation and...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Nicholas Aroney
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Liège Library 2017-01-01
Series:Fédéralisme-Régionalisme
id doaj-f550c5a5c0cc45faaf75ada15824c14d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f550c5a5c0cc45faaf75ada15824c14d2020-11-25T02:40:43ZengUniversity of Liège LibraryFédéralisme-Régionalisme1374-38641374-38642017-01-0117110.25518/1374-3864.1723The High Court of Australie : A Federal Supreme Court in a Common Law FederationNicholas AroneyThe High Court of Australia performs several judicial functions that are fundamental to the federal system1. It determines appeals from all state supreme courts and inferior federal courts and it has original jurisdiction in several kinds of matters, including those involving the interpretation and application of the constitution. This means that the Court is the final arbiter of disputes concerning constitutionality of laws enacted by the federation, as well as those of the states. The High Court consists of seven judges, appointed by the federal government, who hold tenured office until the age of 70. As such, the judges exercise very substantial powers in a manner that is institutionally independent of the political branches of government. In this context, the most significant causes of constitutional change in Australia have been the tendency of federated governments to press the scope of their powers up to and arguably beyond their constitutional limits and High Court decisions which have mostly affirmed those exercises of power. However, while the Court has done much to strengthen the federation, the states are still fundamental to the system of government. The states continue to play an important role in federal politics and remain vigorous centres of regional and local political engagement. Moreover, recent developments suggest that the High Court may be taking a renewed interest in preserving the role of the states within the Australian constitutional system.
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Nicholas Aroney
spellingShingle Nicholas Aroney
The High Court of Australie : A Federal Supreme Court in a Common Law Federation
Fédéralisme-Régionalisme
author_facet Nicholas Aroney
author_sort Nicholas Aroney
title The High Court of Australie : A Federal Supreme Court in a Common Law Federation
title_short The High Court of Australie : A Federal Supreme Court in a Common Law Federation
title_full The High Court of Australie : A Federal Supreme Court in a Common Law Federation
title_fullStr The High Court of Australie : A Federal Supreme Court in a Common Law Federation
title_full_unstemmed The High Court of Australie : A Federal Supreme Court in a Common Law Federation
title_sort high court of australie : a federal supreme court in a common law federation
publisher University of Liège Library
series Fédéralisme-Régionalisme
issn 1374-3864
1374-3864
publishDate 2017-01-01
description The High Court of Australia performs several judicial functions that are fundamental to the federal system1. It determines appeals from all state supreme courts and inferior federal courts and it has original jurisdiction in several kinds of matters, including those involving the interpretation and application of the constitution. This means that the Court is the final arbiter of disputes concerning constitutionality of laws enacted by the federation, as well as those of the states. The High Court consists of seven judges, appointed by the federal government, who hold tenured office until the age of 70. As such, the judges exercise very substantial powers in a manner that is institutionally independent of the political branches of government. In this context, the most significant causes of constitutional change in Australia have been the tendency of federated governments to press the scope of their powers up to and arguably beyond their constitutional limits and High Court decisions which have mostly affirmed those exercises of power. However, while the Court has done much to strengthen the federation, the states are still fundamental to the system of government. The states continue to play an important role in federal politics and remain vigorous centres of regional and local political engagement. Moreover, recent developments suggest that the High Court may be taking a renewed interest in preserving the role of the states within the Australian constitutional system.
work_keys_str_mv AT nicholasaroney thehighcourtofaustralieafederalsupremecourtinacommonlawfederation
AT nicholasaroney highcourtofaustralieafederalsupremecourtinacommonlawfederation
_version_ 1724780148317749248