Justice Delayed is Justice Denied: Protecting Mines against Occupational Injuries and Diseases: Comments on Mankayi v Anglogold Ashanti Ltd 2011 32 ILJ 545 (CC)

In the Mankayai v Anglogold Ashant Ltd 2011 32 ILJ 545 (CC) the Constitutional Court was called upon to give meaning and content by interpreting the provision of section 35 of Compensation for Occupational Injuries and Diseases Act 130 of 1993 (COIDA) and section 100(2) of the Occupational Diseases...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: CI Tshoose
Format: Article
Language:Afrikaans
Published: North-West University 2011-12-01
Series:Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.nwu.ac.za/webfm_send/43778
id doaj-f545f955b95c46878791c4730983ed27
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f545f955b95c46878791c4730983ed272020-11-25T03:29:38ZafrNorth-West UniversityPotchefstroom Electronic Law Journal1727-37812011-12-01147232261Justice Delayed is Justice Denied: Protecting Mines against Occupational Injuries and Diseases: Comments on Mankayi v Anglogold Ashanti Ltd 2011 32 ILJ 545 (CC)CI TshooseIn the Mankayai v Anglogold Ashant Ltd 2011 32 ILJ 545 (CC) the Constitutional Court was called upon to give meaning and content by interpreting the provision of section 35 of Compensation for Occupational Injuries and Diseases Act 130 of 1993 (COIDA) and section 100(2) of the Occupational Diseases in Mines and Works Act 78 of 1973. The Court had to determine if the employee common-law right of recourse against his employer in cases where he sustained occupational diseases is extinguished by virtue of section 35(1) of COIDA. The purpose of this case note is twofold: firstly, it analyses the decision of the Constitutional Court in the Mankayi case; secondly, the case note looks at the significance of the Mankayi case for the system of occupational health and safety in South Africa. In conclusion, the contribution explores the need for the introduction of a unified system which will address issues of occupational health and safety in a coordinated and unified manner.http://www.nwu.ac.za/webfm_send/43778Occupational healthdiseasesinjuriesemployeesprotectionjustice
collection DOAJ
language Afrikaans
format Article
sources DOAJ
author CI Tshoose
spellingShingle CI Tshoose
Justice Delayed is Justice Denied: Protecting Mines against Occupational Injuries and Diseases: Comments on Mankayi v Anglogold Ashanti Ltd 2011 32 ILJ 545 (CC)
Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal
Occupational health
diseases
injuries
employees
protection
justice
author_facet CI Tshoose
author_sort CI Tshoose
title Justice Delayed is Justice Denied: Protecting Mines against Occupational Injuries and Diseases: Comments on Mankayi v Anglogold Ashanti Ltd 2011 32 ILJ 545 (CC)
title_short Justice Delayed is Justice Denied: Protecting Mines against Occupational Injuries and Diseases: Comments on Mankayi v Anglogold Ashanti Ltd 2011 32 ILJ 545 (CC)
title_full Justice Delayed is Justice Denied: Protecting Mines against Occupational Injuries and Diseases: Comments on Mankayi v Anglogold Ashanti Ltd 2011 32 ILJ 545 (CC)
title_fullStr Justice Delayed is Justice Denied: Protecting Mines against Occupational Injuries and Diseases: Comments on Mankayi v Anglogold Ashanti Ltd 2011 32 ILJ 545 (CC)
title_full_unstemmed Justice Delayed is Justice Denied: Protecting Mines against Occupational Injuries and Diseases: Comments on Mankayi v Anglogold Ashanti Ltd 2011 32 ILJ 545 (CC)
title_sort justice delayed is justice denied: protecting mines against occupational injuries and diseases: comments on mankayi v anglogold ashanti ltd 2011 32 ilj 545 (cc)
publisher North-West University
series Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal
issn 1727-3781
publishDate 2011-12-01
description In the Mankayai v Anglogold Ashant Ltd 2011 32 ILJ 545 (CC) the Constitutional Court was called upon to give meaning and content by interpreting the provision of section 35 of Compensation for Occupational Injuries and Diseases Act 130 of 1993 (COIDA) and section 100(2) of the Occupational Diseases in Mines and Works Act 78 of 1973. The Court had to determine if the employee common-law right of recourse against his employer in cases where he sustained occupational diseases is extinguished by virtue of section 35(1) of COIDA. The purpose of this case note is twofold: firstly, it analyses the decision of the Constitutional Court in the Mankayi case; secondly, the case note looks at the significance of the Mankayi case for the system of occupational health and safety in South Africa. In conclusion, the contribution explores the need for the introduction of a unified system which will address issues of occupational health and safety in a coordinated and unified manner.
topic Occupational health
diseases
injuries
employees
protection
justice
url http://www.nwu.ac.za/webfm_send/43778
work_keys_str_mv AT citshoose justicedelayedisjusticedeniedprotectingminesagainstoccupationalinjuriesanddiseasescommentsonmankayivanglogoldashantiltd201132ilj545cc
_version_ 1724577944826806272