Indigenizing Climate Policy in Canada: A Critical Examination of the Pan-Canadian Framework and the ZéN RoadMap

Climate policies and plans can lead to disproportionate impacts and benefits across different kinds of communities, serving to reinforce, and even exacerbate existing structural inequities and injustices. This is the case in Canada where, we argue, climate policy and planning is reproducing settler-...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Graeme Reed, Jen Gobby, Rebecca Sinclair, Rachel Ivey, H. Damon Matthews
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-08-01
Series:Frontiers in Sustainable Cities
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frsc.2021.644675/full
id doaj-f542e54d3788437b9159041a30d64f7b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f542e54d3788437b9159041a30d64f7b2021-08-12T05:11:44ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Sustainable Cities2624-96342021-08-01310.3389/frsc.2021.644675644675Indigenizing Climate Policy in Canada: A Critical Examination of the Pan-Canadian Framework and the ZéN RoadMapGraeme Reed0Jen Gobby1Rebecca Sinclair2Rachel Ivey3H. Damon Matthews4School of Environmental Design and Rural Development, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, CanadaDepartment of Geography Planning and Environment, Concordia University, Montreal, QC, CanadaIndependent Researcher, Winnipeg, MN, CanadaIndependent Researcher, Toronto, ON, CanadaDepartment of Geography Planning and Environment, Concordia University, Montreal, QC, CanadaClimate policies and plans can lead to disproportionate impacts and benefits across different kinds of communities, serving to reinforce, and even exacerbate existing structural inequities and injustices. This is the case in Canada where, we argue, climate policy and planning is reproducing settler-colonial relations, violating Indigenous rights, and systematically excluding Indigenous Peoples from policy making. We conducted a critical policy analysis on two climate plans in Canada: the Pan Canadian Framework on Clean Growth and Climate Change (Pan-Canadian Framework), a federal government-led, top-down plan for reducing emissions; and the Québec ZéN (zero émissions nette, or net-zero emissions) Roadmap, a province-wide, bottom-up energy transition plan developed by civil society and environmental groups in Quebec. Our analysis found that, despite aspirational references to Indigenous Peoples and their inclusion, both the Pan-Canadian Framework and the ZéN Roadmap failed to uphold the right to self-determination and to free, prior, and informed consent, conflicting with commitments to reconciliation and a “Nation-to-Nation” relationship. Recognizing these limitations, we identify six components for an Indigenous-led climate policy agenda. These not including clear calls to action that climate policy must: prioritize the land and emphasize the need to rebalance our relationships with Mother Earth; position Indigenous Nations as Nations with the inherent right to self-determination; prioritize Indigenous knowledge systems; and advance climate-solutions that are interconnected, interdependent, and multi-dimensional. While this supports the emerging literature on Indigenous-led climate solutions, we stress that these calls offer a starting point, but additional work led by Indigenous Peoples and Nations is required to breathe life into a true Indigenous-led climate policy.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frsc.2021.644675/fullclimate policy and planningindigenous self-determinationsettler colonialismCanadadecolonization
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Graeme Reed
Jen Gobby
Rebecca Sinclair
Rachel Ivey
H. Damon Matthews
spellingShingle Graeme Reed
Jen Gobby
Rebecca Sinclair
Rachel Ivey
H. Damon Matthews
Indigenizing Climate Policy in Canada: A Critical Examination of the Pan-Canadian Framework and the ZéN RoadMap
Frontiers in Sustainable Cities
climate policy and planning
indigenous self-determination
settler colonialism
Canada
decolonization
author_facet Graeme Reed
Jen Gobby
Rebecca Sinclair
Rachel Ivey
H. Damon Matthews
author_sort Graeme Reed
title Indigenizing Climate Policy in Canada: A Critical Examination of the Pan-Canadian Framework and the ZéN RoadMap
title_short Indigenizing Climate Policy in Canada: A Critical Examination of the Pan-Canadian Framework and the ZéN RoadMap
title_full Indigenizing Climate Policy in Canada: A Critical Examination of the Pan-Canadian Framework and the ZéN RoadMap
title_fullStr Indigenizing Climate Policy in Canada: A Critical Examination of the Pan-Canadian Framework and the ZéN RoadMap
title_full_unstemmed Indigenizing Climate Policy in Canada: A Critical Examination of the Pan-Canadian Framework and the ZéN RoadMap
title_sort indigenizing climate policy in canada: a critical examination of the pan-canadian framework and the zén roadmap
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Sustainable Cities
issn 2624-9634
publishDate 2021-08-01
description Climate policies and plans can lead to disproportionate impacts and benefits across different kinds of communities, serving to reinforce, and even exacerbate existing structural inequities and injustices. This is the case in Canada where, we argue, climate policy and planning is reproducing settler-colonial relations, violating Indigenous rights, and systematically excluding Indigenous Peoples from policy making. We conducted a critical policy analysis on two climate plans in Canada: the Pan Canadian Framework on Clean Growth and Climate Change (Pan-Canadian Framework), a federal government-led, top-down plan for reducing emissions; and the Québec ZéN (zero émissions nette, or net-zero emissions) Roadmap, a province-wide, bottom-up energy transition plan developed by civil society and environmental groups in Quebec. Our analysis found that, despite aspirational references to Indigenous Peoples and their inclusion, both the Pan-Canadian Framework and the ZéN Roadmap failed to uphold the right to self-determination and to free, prior, and informed consent, conflicting with commitments to reconciliation and a “Nation-to-Nation” relationship. Recognizing these limitations, we identify six components for an Indigenous-led climate policy agenda. These not including clear calls to action that climate policy must: prioritize the land and emphasize the need to rebalance our relationships with Mother Earth; position Indigenous Nations as Nations with the inherent right to self-determination; prioritize Indigenous knowledge systems; and advance climate-solutions that are interconnected, interdependent, and multi-dimensional. While this supports the emerging literature on Indigenous-led climate solutions, we stress that these calls offer a starting point, but additional work led by Indigenous Peoples and Nations is required to breathe life into a true Indigenous-led climate policy.
topic climate policy and planning
indigenous self-determination
settler colonialism
Canada
decolonization
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frsc.2021.644675/full
work_keys_str_mv AT graemereed indigenizingclimatepolicyincanadaacriticalexaminationofthepancanadianframeworkandthezenroadmap
AT jengobby indigenizingclimatepolicyincanadaacriticalexaminationofthepancanadianframeworkandthezenroadmap
AT rebeccasinclair indigenizingclimatepolicyincanadaacriticalexaminationofthepancanadianframeworkandthezenroadmap
AT rachelivey indigenizingclimatepolicyincanadaacriticalexaminationofthepancanadianframeworkandthezenroadmap
AT hdamonmatthews indigenizingclimatepolicyincanadaacriticalexaminationofthepancanadianframeworkandthezenroadmap
_version_ 1721209825337016320