De l’anthropologie appliquée à l’anthropologue impliqué
Feeling trapped by the classical and consequently ethnocentric dichotomy between theory and practice, contemporary anthropologists have hurried downstream seeking at once to personalize their discipline (“no anthropology without autobiography”) and render it more relevant to our common future (hence...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Université Catholique de Louvain
2008-12-01
|
| Series: | Recherches Sociologiques et Anthropologiques |
| Online Access: | http://journals.openedition.org/rsa/350 |
| id |
doaj-f53171b6dd7b45b491db99d8ac29f939 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
Article |
| spelling |
doaj-f53171b6dd7b45b491db99d8ac29f9392020-11-24T22:25:25ZengUniversité Catholique de LouvainRecherches Sociologiques et Anthropologiques1782-15922033-74852008-12-0139210.4000/rsa.350De l’anthropologie appliquée à l’anthropologue impliquéMike SingletonFeeling trapped by the classical and consequently ethnocentric dichotomy between theory and practice, contemporary anthropologists have hurried downstream seeking at once to personalize their discipline (“no anthropology without autobiography”) and render it more relevant to our common future (hence an “applied anthropology”). But upstream, onto-epistemologically, there where several modern philosophers find themselves with such notions as the real being relational (Marion), encounter and recognition (Ricoeur) or the self as replying to the Other (Levinas), it could be that whether he or she wills it or not, an anthropologist is implicated from the outset.http://journals.openedition.org/rsa/350 |
| collection |
DOAJ |
| language |
English |
| format |
Article |
| sources |
DOAJ |
| author |
Mike Singleton |
| spellingShingle |
Mike Singleton De l’anthropologie appliquée à l’anthropologue impliqué Recherches Sociologiques et Anthropologiques |
| author_facet |
Mike Singleton |
| author_sort |
Mike Singleton |
| title |
De l’anthropologie appliquée à l’anthropologue impliqué |
| title_short |
De l’anthropologie appliquée à l’anthropologue impliqué |
| title_full |
De l’anthropologie appliquée à l’anthropologue impliqué |
| title_fullStr |
De l’anthropologie appliquée à l’anthropologue impliqué |
| title_full_unstemmed |
De l’anthropologie appliquée à l’anthropologue impliqué |
| title_sort |
de l’anthropologie appliquée à l’anthropologue impliqué |
| publisher |
Université Catholique de Louvain |
| series |
Recherches Sociologiques et Anthropologiques |
| issn |
1782-1592 2033-7485 |
| publishDate |
2008-12-01 |
| description |
Feeling trapped by the classical and consequently ethnocentric dichotomy between theory and practice, contemporary anthropologists have hurried downstream seeking at once to personalize their discipline (“no anthropology without autobiography”) and render it more relevant to our common future (hence an “applied anthropology”). But upstream, onto-epistemologically, there where several modern philosophers find themselves with such notions as the real being relational (Marion), encounter and recognition (Ricoeur) or the self as replying to the Other (Levinas), it could be that whether he or she wills it or not, an anthropologist is implicated from the outset. |
| url |
http://journals.openedition.org/rsa/350 |
| work_keys_str_mv |
AT mikesingleton delanthropologieappliqueealanthropologueimplique |
| _version_ |
1725757718280536064 |