Improving SWAT Model Calibration Using Soil MERGE (SMERGE)

This study examined eight Great Plains moderate-sized (832 to 4892 km<sup>2</sup>) watersheds. The Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) autocalibration routine SUFI-2 was executed using twenty-three model parameters, from 1995 to 2015 in each basin, to identify highly sensitive paramete...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kenneth J. Tobin, Marvin E. Bennett
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-07-01
Series:Water
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/12/7/2039
id doaj-f518c94b7420455d9f1b21e321ba2558
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f518c94b7420455d9f1b21e321ba25582020-11-25T03:43:05ZengMDPI AGWater2073-44412020-07-01122039203910.3390/w12072039Improving SWAT Model Calibration Using Soil MERGE (SMERGE)Kenneth J. Tobin0Marvin E. Bennett1Center for Earth and Environmental Studies, Texas A&M International University, Laredo, TX 78045, USACenter for Earth and Environmental Studies, Texas A&M International University, Laredo, TX 78045, USAThis study examined eight Great Plains moderate-sized (832 to 4892 km<sup>2</sup>) watersheds. The Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) autocalibration routine SUFI-2 was executed using twenty-three model parameters, from 1995 to 2015 in each basin, to identify highly sensitive parameters (HSP). The model was then run on a year-by-year basis, generating optimal parameter values for each year (1995 to 2015). HSP were correlated against annual precipitation (Parameter-elevation Regressions on Independent Slopes Model—PRISM) and root zone soil moisture (Soil MERGE—SMERGE 2.0) anomaly data. HSP with robust correlation (r > 0.5) were used to calibrate the model on an annual basis (2016 to 2018). Results were compared against a baseline simulation, in which optimal parameters were obtained by running the model for the entire period (1992 to 2015). This approach improved performance for annual simulations generated from 2016 to 2018. SMERGE 2.0 produced more robust results compared with the PRISM product. The main virtue of this approach is that it constrains parameter space, minimizesing equifinality and promotesing modeling based on more physically realistic parameter values.https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/12/7/2039SMERGE 2.0PRISMroot zone soil moistureSWATUS Great Plainsmass balance
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Kenneth J. Tobin
Marvin E. Bennett
spellingShingle Kenneth J. Tobin
Marvin E. Bennett
Improving SWAT Model Calibration Using Soil MERGE (SMERGE)
Water
SMERGE 2.0
PRISM
root zone soil moisture
SWAT
US Great Plains
mass balance
author_facet Kenneth J. Tobin
Marvin E. Bennett
author_sort Kenneth J. Tobin
title Improving SWAT Model Calibration Using Soil MERGE (SMERGE)
title_short Improving SWAT Model Calibration Using Soil MERGE (SMERGE)
title_full Improving SWAT Model Calibration Using Soil MERGE (SMERGE)
title_fullStr Improving SWAT Model Calibration Using Soil MERGE (SMERGE)
title_full_unstemmed Improving SWAT Model Calibration Using Soil MERGE (SMERGE)
title_sort improving swat model calibration using soil merge (smerge)
publisher MDPI AG
series Water
issn 2073-4441
publishDate 2020-07-01
description This study examined eight Great Plains moderate-sized (832 to 4892 km<sup>2</sup>) watersheds. The Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) autocalibration routine SUFI-2 was executed using twenty-three model parameters, from 1995 to 2015 in each basin, to identify highly sensitive parameters (HSP). The model was then run on a year-by-year basis, generating optimal parameter values for each year (1995 to 2015). HSP were correlated against annual precipitation (Parameter-elevation Regressions on Independent Slopes Model—PRISM) and root zone soil moisture (Soil MERGE—SMERGE 2.0) anomaly data. HSP with robust correlation (r > 0.5) were used to calibrate the model on an annual basis (2016 to 2018). Results were compared against a baseline simulation, in which optimal parameters were obtained by running the model for the entire period (1992 to 2015). This approach improved performance for annual simulations generated from 2016 to 2018. SMERGE 2.0 produced more robust results compared with the PRISM product. The main virtue of this approach is that it constrains parameter space, minimizesing equifinality and promotesing modeling based on more physically realistic parameter values.
topic SMERGE 2.0
PRISM
root zone soil moisture
SWAT
US Great Plains
mass balance
url https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/12/7/2039
work_keys_str_mv AT kennethjtobin improvingswatmodelcalibrationusingsoilmergesmerge
AT marvinebennett improvingswatmodelcalibrationusingsoilmergesmerge
_version_ 1724521333160673280