Impact of patient position on the outcomes of percutaneous neprolithotomy for complex kidney stones

ABSTRACT Purpose: To evaluate the impact of the patient position on the outcomes of PCNL among patients with complex renal stones. Material and Methods: From July 2011 to July 2014, we collected prospective data of consecutive patients who underwent PCNL. We included all patients with complex ston...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Fabio Carvalho Vicentini, Rodrigo Perrella, Vinicius M. G. Souza, Marcelo Hisano, Claudio Bovolenta Murta, Joaquim Francisco de Almeida Claro
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia
Series:International Brazilian Journal of Urology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382018000500965&lng=en&tlng=en
id doaj-f50289aec74e4b10a7902810d885093a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f50289aec74e4b10a7902810d885093a2020-11-24T21:59:07ZengSociedade Brasileira de UrologiaInternational Brazilian Journal of Urology1677-611944596597110.1590/s1677-5538.ibju.2018.0163S1677-55382018000500965Impact of patient position on the outcomes of percutaneous neprolithotomy for complex kidney stonesFabio Carvalho VicentiniRodrigo PerrellaVinicius M. G. SouzaMarcelo HisanoClaudio Bovolenta MurtaJoaquim Francisco de Almeida ClaroABSTRACT Purpose: To evaluate the impact of the patient position on the outcomes of PCNL among patients with complex renal stones. Material and Methods: From July 2011 to July 2014, we collected prospective data of consecutive patients who underwent PCNL. We included all patients with complex stones (Guy's Stone Score 3 or 4 (GSS) based on a CT scan) and divided them based on the position used during PCNL (prone or supine). The variables analyzed were gender, age, body mass index, ASA score, stone diameter, GSS, number of punctures, calyx puncture site, intercostal access and patient positioning. Complications were graded according to the modified-Clavien Classification. Success was considered if fragments ≤ 4mm were observed on the first postoperative day CT scan. Results: We analyzed 240 (46.4%) of 517 PCNL performed during the study period that were classified as GGS 3-4. Regarding patient positions, 21.2% were prone and 79.8% were supine. Both groups were comparable, although intercostal access was more common in prone cases (25.5% vs 10.5%; p=0.01). The success rates, complications, blood transfusions and surgical times were similar for both groups; however, there were significantly more visceral injuries (10.3% vs 2.6%; p=0.046) and sepsis (7.8% vs 2.1%; p=0.042) in prone cases. Conclusion: Supine or prone position were equally suitable for PCNL with complex stones and did not impact the success rates. However, supine position was associated with fewer sepsis cases and visceral injuries.http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382018000500965&lng=en&tlng=enKidney CalculiNephrolithotomyPercutaneousSupine PositionProne Position
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Fabio Carvalho Vicentini
Rodrigo Perrella
Vinicius M. G. Souza
Marcelo Hisano
Claudio Bovolenta Murta
Joaquim Francisco de Almeida Claro
spellingShingle Fabio Carvalho Vicentini
Rodrigo Perrella
Vinicius M. G. Souza
Marcelo Hisano
Claudio Bovolenta Murta
Joaquim Francisco de Almeida Claro
Impact of patient position on the outcomes of percutaneous neprolithotomy for complex kidney stones
International Brazilian Journal of Urology
Kidney Calculi
Nephrolithotomy
Percutaneous
Supine Position
Prone Position
author_facet Fabio Carvalho Vicentini
Rodrigo Perrella
Vinicius M. G. Souza
Marcelo Hisano
Claudio Bovolenta Murta
Joaquim Francisco de Almeida Claro
author_sort Fabio Carvalho Vicentini
title Impact of patient position on the outcomes of percutaneous neprolithotomy for complex kidney stones
title_short Impact of patient position on the outcomes of percutaneous neprolithotomy for complex kidney stones
title_full Impact of patient position on the outcomes of percutaneous neprolithotomy for complex kidney stones
title_fullStr Impact of patient position on the outcomes of percutaneous neprolithotomy for complex kidney stones
title_full_unstemmed Impact of patient position on the outcomes of percutaneous neprolithotomy for complex kidney stones
title_sort impact of patient position on the outcomes of percutaneous neprolithotomy for complex kidney stones
publisher Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia
series International Brazilian Journal of Urology
issn 1677-6119
description ABSTRACT Purpose: To evaluate the impact of the patient position on the outcomes of PCNL among patients with complex renal stones. Material and Methods: From July 2011 to July 2014, we collected prospective data of consecutive patients who underwent PCNL. We included all patients with complex stones (Guy's Stone Score 3 or 4 (GSS) based on a CT scan) and divided them based on the position used during PCNL (prone or supine). The variables analyzed were gender, age, body mass index, ASA score, stone diameter, GSS, number of punctures, calyx puncture site, intercostal access and patient positioning. Complications were graded according to the modified-Clavien Classification. Success was considered if fragments ≤ 4mm were observed on the first postoperative day CT scan. Results: We analyzed 240 (46.4%) of 517 PCNL performed during the study period that were classified as GGS 3-4. Regarding patient positions, 21.2% were prone and 79.8% were supine. Both groups were comparable, although intercostal access was more common in prone cases (25.5% vs 10.5%; p=0.01). The success rates, complications, blood transfusions and surgical times were similar for both groups; however, there were significantly more visceral injuries (10.3% vs 2.6%; p=0.046) and sepsis (7.8% vs 2.1%; p=0.042) in prone cases. Conclusion: Supine or prone position were equally suitable for PCNL with complex stones and did not impact the success rates. However, supine position was associated with fewer sepsis cases and visceral injuries.
topic Kidney Calculi
Nephrolithotomy
Percutaneous
Supine Position
Prone Position
url http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382018000500965&lng=en&tlng=en
work_keys_str_mv AT fabiocarvalhovicentini impactofpatientpositionontheoutcomesofpercutaneousneprolithotomyforcomplexkidneystones
AT rodrigoperrella impactofpatientpositionontheoutcomesofpercutaneousneprolithotomyforcomplexkidneystones
AT viniciusmgsouza impactofpatientpositionontheoutcomesofpercutaneousneprolithotomyforcomplexkidneystones
AT marcelohisano impactofpatientpositionontheoutcomesofpercutaneousneprolithotomyforcomplexkidneystones
AT claudiobovolentamurta impactofpatientpositionontheoutcomesofpercutaneousneprolithotomyforcomplexkidneystones
AT joaquimfranciscodealmeidaclaro impactofpatientpositionontheoutcomesofpercutaneousneprolithotomyforcomplexkidneystones
_version_ 1725849097180545024